<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for climenole</title><link>https://disqus.com/by/climenole/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://disqus.com/climenole/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:43:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Wave: 5 Ways It Could Change the Web</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/05/google-wave-ideas/#comment-16038101</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ben Parr :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just a short comment to say how this post is awesome.&lt;br&gt;Google Wave? I want it asaaaaaap!  :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW, I always learn new things in your articles: you're #1  in my blog list.&lt;br&gt;Thank you.&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">climenole</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:43:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why we should all be Trust Agents</title><link>http://loiclemeur.com/english/2009/08/why-we-should-all-be-trust-agents.html#comment-15649202</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Loïc LeMeur :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What a great book review indeed. The only thing I want now is to read this book asap. Chris Brogan focused on what is important: trust, because the Web² is about people not data. And I like the the formula of trust { may be because I'm a formula addict ;-) }&lt;br&gt;Going to the book store now. ;-)&lt;br&gt;Have a nice day.&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">climenole</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:38:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Talkback: What Makes a Quality Tweet?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/16/quality-twitter-tweet/#comment-14907458</link><description>&lt;p&gt;:-O My comment was sent 2 times... sorry for this.. . ;-\&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">climenole</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 09:17:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Talkback: What Makes a Quality Tweet?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/16/quality-twitter-tweet/#comment-14907430</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Soren Grodhamer  :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree with you for the importance of these factors in a good tweet but I would like to stressed about the percentage of each. Sure, it's important to be, say "personnal", but too much of "personnal" tweet may rebuke some readers. The same apply for the other factors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Actually, there's no optimal mix of these factors because readers are different. For sure somebody may try to makes a kind of tweeter readers market research and tweet accordingly to reach a maximum of audience. Again this is not, imho, the best way to do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;May be the best is to figure out what is your ideal reader and create your audience with your own personnal mix of informative, humourous, personnal and inspiring tweets. I found this idea in a text of Umberto Eco about the writers and their audience... Is this apply to Twitter?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To these 4 factors I would like to add these: asking questions, answering question and engage "conversation" (very limited with twitter).  And because Twitter is not only about information or 'data processing, but poeple, we have to remember that's impossible to  please to everybody...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;:)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">climenole</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 09:15:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AP to Dominate Google Rankings?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/ap-landing-pages/#comment-14796044</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does AP will make more money this way? Allow me to doubt a little ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The ranking is a good way to have more traffic but their policy to charge for quoted stories go to the opposite way. I hope that Reuters will also use these methods of positioning to compete with AP.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Combined with their position about the "linked economy" they will be the winners!&lt;br&gt;(May be a "wishful thinking" ... ;-)  )&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ref:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;AP Continues To Misunderstand: You Don't Succeed By Limiting The Spread Of Content&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20090813/0112145863.shtml" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://techdirt.com/articles/20090813/0112145863.shtml"&gt;http://techdirt.com/article...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why I believe in the link economy&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/08/04/why-i-believe-in-the-link-economy/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/08/04/why-i-believe-in-the-link-economy/"&gt;http://blogs.reuters.com/me...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;:)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">climenole</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:28:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How can ANYONE follow 10,000 or more?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/08/12/how-can-anyone-follow-10000-or-more/#comment-14714128</link><description>&lt;p&gt;:D   Really funny: worth to be tweeted!  :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">climenole</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:25:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How can ANYONE follow 10,000 or more?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/08/12/how-can-anyone-follow-10000-or-more/#comment-14712313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Robert Scoble  :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You wrote: «I miss all Tweets while I sleep» You sleep? First news! I am a little disappointed ...     ;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree it's  an endorsement and define a kind of "identity" or what ethologists call an Umwelt: the small world around you ou your "micro-society". This and the FACT nobodies can read  thousands  tweets from thousands tweeters. Reducing the number of tweeters to follow is a way to reduced noise and keep the signal. Everybody have the right to choose which message is a signal and which one is a noise (for himself).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have a nice day.  :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">climenole</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:44:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Alternative Streamy Hammered By New Traffic</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/11/streamy-friendfeed/#comment-14704894</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ben Parr  :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Steamy eh? Not bad but definitively not a FailFriend (formely known as FriendFeed) replacement. The interface is so so and lack of simplicity and elegance. The aggregation of Web services too much limited and not what the former users of FF are looking for.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The betrayal transaction fb+ff creates a vacuum and I'm sure somebody somewhere have a plan to offer a replacement solution... ;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have a nice day.  :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">climenole</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:20:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Down: It Was An Attack</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/11/twitter-down-its-not-just-you/#comment-14652974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ben Parr :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;After the betrayal of FailFriend (formely known as FriendFeed)&lt;br&gt;I become paranoiac:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;« this attack against Twitter comes from FF guys !!!»   :-O&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;=&amp;gt;&amp;gt;  ;-)  For sure this is a joke  ;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;May be some infected PCs from the bot who started the DDoS previously.&lt;br&gt;Twitter recover from this in about 15 min. Not a big problem indeed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;:)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">climenole</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:45:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh, FriendFeed is now Facebook&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;official&amp;#8221; R&amp;#038;D department!</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/08/10/facebook-friendfeed/#comment-14613010</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi John E. Bredehoft  :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;May be your right. I read somewhere that the number of FF users do not increase enough to give a "kick" to this application. Now I'm looking for a replacement of this fabulous (and unacheived) application...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;:S&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">climenole</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:11:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HOW TO: Take Advantage of FriendFeed&amp;#8217;s Unique Features</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/friendfeed-tips-saved-searches/#comment-14609897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Barb Dybwad&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;FriendFeed is Dead. Vampirized by facebook. Call it FailFriend and forget it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Very bad day... :-((&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">climenole</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:42:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh, FriendFeed is now Facebook&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;official&amp;#8221; R&amp;#038;D department!</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/08/10/facebook-friendfeed/#comment-14609536</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Robert Scoble&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1st: the Google Friend Connect tool on your site suck. Is it possible to remove this gadget and keep your site clean?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2nd: I'm furious since I read the news of the FriendFeed acquisition by facebook. I still believe that FF guys never developped their product at his full potential: lack of creativity? May be. They take their ca$h and they have the right to do it because it's their business: who care the users (you know that bunch of morons relying on free web two dot zero applications?)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The facebook application will probably add some feature of FriendFeed in the sucking interface of facebook but for the rest, FriendFeed is dead.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The poeple of FF missed the next step in the FF development: after the aggregation, the possibility to mashed up and publish on platform like Wordpress (for example). Instead they choose to make money fast instead of creating a new and genuine Web 2.0 service different of all the other ones. They choose the short term and money. This is a very sad day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;:-S&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">climenole</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:32:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Downtime: What Did You Do Instead?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/07/twitter-downtime-2/#comment-14440354</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter is still unavailable for me at this moment. (Aug. 7Th, 13:30 H est). Nevertheless, I have some new followers today... (?!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Founded new Rss feeds (at Reuter for example) and organized them in Feedly, Maintenance of my bookmarks, preparing new articles for my blog, try to make my son's laptop to live (a crashed Toshiba + Vista :-(( : what a hell!), and the most important, I guess I will flush my Twitter account and stop to waste my time with poeple following me but never read or give feedback to my tweets. Fed up to communicate in a vacuum. That's what I'm doing (and thinking) at this very moment. :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.S I also read excellent articles I missed in Mashable: "How to" for example and stop to be an "e-nalphabet"  ;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have a Great "Twitterless" Day!  :)))&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">climenole</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:42:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Politwitt : Twitter, politique et conversation</title><link>http://blog.politwitt.net/3/statistiques_et_analyse_semantique_des_twitt#comment-11064683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pas de quoi. Si je trouve qq chose qui pourrais vous être utile, je ne manquerai pas de vous le signaler. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">climenole</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:14:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Politwitt : Twitter, politique et conversation</title><link>http://blog.politwitt.net/3/statistiques_et_analyse_semantique_des_twitt#comment-11055037</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Intéressant mais on aimerait plus de détails. Des comparaisons entre les formations politiques, les niveaux de gouvernements, et ce qui se fait ailleurs (USA, UE) seraient aussi les bienvenus.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Peut-être n'y a-t-il pas suffisamment de politiciens qui utilisent twitter (ou simplement.... Internet!). Ce serait bien d'inclure aussi ceux qui n'utilisent pas twitter... Juste pour avoir une idée de l'état "connecté" ou pas de nos politiciens... ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;L'idée d'un "politwitt" est super: bravo!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bonne journée. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">climenole</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:27:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vol de mots de passe et �nglage de pirate �'UQAM - Actualit�</title><link>http://www.directioninformatique.com/DI/client/fr/DirectionInformatique/Nouvelles.asp?id=53343&amp;cid=79#comment-10243168</link><description>&lt;p&gt;C'est assez étonnant de constater que des institutions universitaires soient si vulnérables à de telles intrusions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Est-ce dû à une négligence dans les politiques de sécurité du réseau, ou dans leur application, ou bien encore une vulnérabilité des applications informatiques utilisées?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Quoiqu'il en soit, l'intrus a été neutralisé et espérons-le, assez rapidement pour éviter plus de dégâts...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;:-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">climenole</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:08:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>