<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for dotlizard</title><link>https://disqus.com/by/dotlizard/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://disqus.com/dotlizard/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 14:09:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Florida man beaten by angry mob and shamed online after trying to help lost 2-year-old find her family</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/florida-man-beaten-by-angry-mob-and-shamed-online-after-trying-to-help-lost-2-year-old-find-her-family/#comment-3388395074</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Misdirection. "Look! Over there! So you won't notice how bad we screwed up!"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 14:09:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Colorado Officials Ask Arizona Prohibitionists to Stop Lying</title><link>http://www.weednews.co/colorado-officials-ask-arizona-prohibitionists-to-stop-lying/#comment-2985783850</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!" - Upton Sinclair&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 01:27:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free download: 100 Web Design Icons from freepik.com</title><link>http://www.webdesignerdepot.com?p=84291&amp;preview_id=84291#comment-2802629949</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It doesn't say that they are exclusive to webdesignerdepot, so you could try just going to &lt;a href="http://freepik.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="freepik.com"&gt;freepik.com&lt;/a&gt; and finding them there. &lt;a href="http://freepik.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="freepik.com"&gt;freepik.com&lt;/a&gt; is awesome.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wouldn't send out an unedited, boilerplate tweet either. No one pays attention to those pre-formulated tweets anyway, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:04:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bike Thieves Get Pranked in This Hilarious Video</title><link>http://www.bicycling.com/culture/news/bike-thieves-get-pranked-hilarious-video#comment-2332549985</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sued, yes, and put in jail for assault as well. Can't set up booby traps to kill thieves. Except in Texas probably.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 02:34:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Am Trying Not to Hate and Fear Men</title><link>http://www.alternet.org/comments/i-am-trying-not-hate-and-fear-men#comment-1769306763</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Violence has a gender"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No. No it doesn't. What a perfectly idiotic, demonstrably false thing to say.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 19:29:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New York has just stepped up and legalized marriage rights for everyone. How happy are you?</title><link>http://godlizard.com/2011/06/new-york-has-just-stepped-up-and-legalized-marriage-rights-for-everyone-how-happy-are-you/#comment-234547144</link><description>&lt;p&gt;formspring auto-posting ... hmm, something I need to look into. Might not be a good thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:34:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Astronomy Overnight Thread- Peculiar Galaxies of Arp 273</title><link>http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/2011/04/21/astronomy-overnight-thread-peculiar-galaxies-of-arp-273/#comment-190044668</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh I must apologize for not shopping at Amazon through your links. Will do my level best to remember in the future. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:17:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Time for Another Stand-Up Political Comedy Blog</title><link>http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/2011/02/21/time-for-another-stand-up-political-comedy-blog-8/#comment-153491414</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I literally LOL'd. Literally literally, like, I scared the dog. Thanks, I needed that! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:56:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Awesome, thought-provoking questions? Sure thing.</title><link>http://godlizard.com/2010/12/awesome-thought-provoking-questions-sure-thing-this-is-something-thats-been-bothering-me-for-a-while-why-do-you-think-members-of-abrahamic-faiths-seem-so-wont-to-hate-eachother-all-abrahamic-ho/#comment-108590793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This was my first auto-post from Formspring. I am quite happy with how that worked out. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 05:04:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Allow duplicate screen_name in register page in Expression Engine</title><link>http://www.programmingfacts.com/duplicate-screen_name-register/#comment-87321299</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there any reason, other than members getting confused about who is making a comment, that the screen name must be unique? I saw some discussions on the EE forums where a moderator answered questions about this with a definite "no, the screen name must be unique."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have a site where the only time member names are displayed, it's in the judging section -- regular members never interact with each other, so there's no confusion there. I'm just worried that if I change this, there will be unintended consequences from duplicate names.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It bothers me having to insist that members have to create TWO unique names, one for logging in, and another for their screen name. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 19:59:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anil Dash Attempts to Burst the Twitter Bubble</title><link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/1506762#comment-75008335</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, here's a theory: if your follower count increased dramatically as a direct result of getting on Twitter's recommended list, you've got a whole bunch of people who aren't necessarily interested in the sorts of things you tweet about. I would imagine it would be a completely different experience with 300,000 followers who had sought you out specifically because they were already interested in what you might say. There is just a huge difference in the level of engagement between people who were already listening to you, and people who didn't know who to listen to, so they picked from a list. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:34:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, LinkedIn: Multiple e-dentity Disorder</title><link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/1665951#comment-60822234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree 100%. I dislike hearing experts instructing people to be disingenuous in online social settings out of fear of being known for who they really are. The way I see it, if gaining knowledge of my honest opinions and getting a glimpse into my personal life causes someone to decide against doing business with me, that is for the best -- as I do not intend to live my entire life as a charade.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And when it comes down to decisions of who to do business with, I tend to be put off by those who maintain a spotless, sanitized image with no inkling of the real person behind the digital branding -- in much the same way I have become suspicious of glib PR messages. I would rather be confided in than lied to. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:15:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: in which i feed a formspring troll</title><link>http://godlizard.com/2010/03/in-which-i-feed-a-formspring-troll/#comment-43955018</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can only imagine what sort of ugly would have to live inside a person to drive them to go around flaming like this. If you don't like it, don't come here -- it ain't your universe, pal, it's my blog. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:44:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It's Sarah Palin Day on MSNBC</title><link>http://www.thepoliticalcarnival.net/2010/03/its-sarah-palin-day-on-msnbc.html#comment-41900868</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm so glad he fought for our right to get dragged out of political rallies by huge dudes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And you know, teabaggers *never* go to political events and yell at the speaker. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:07:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Utah Has Now Made Miscarriage A Criminal Offense</title><link>http://crooksandliars.com/nicole-belle/utah-has-now-made-miscarriage-crimina#comment-863477237</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Yes, the language of the bill.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Intentional, knowing, reckless" is open to so much interpretation that it is tantamount to making miscarriage illegal. Everything from "you should have known better than to go jogging" to "it was reckless when you went out in the snow to go to work, you knew you could slip and fall". It is naive to assume that those interpretations would be limited to only women who did things specifically to cause a miscarriage. Intentional, knowing, and reckless could be applied to any risk taken. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And consider this -- any time a woman miscarried, her behavior would come under scrutiny. Instead of being comforted, she'd be interrogated.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 07:11:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: like, omg</title><link>http://godlizard.com/2010/02/like-omg/#comment-32957778</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The next time someone asks that, I totally will. Either that, or I'll just say "42" because that's the answer to everything :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:38:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: and now for something completely different</title><link>http://godlizard.com/2010/01/and-now-for-something-completely-different/#comment-30943253</link><description>&lt;p&gt;but ever since watching 2 girls 1 cup, goatse is actually a pleasant memory for me :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:26:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: and now for something completely different</title><link>http://godlizard.com/2010/01/and-now-for-something-completely-different/#comment-30939383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;haha! no, "don't click that link" is how you get people to click it! you tell them they absolutely, positively do NOT want to see it, because people want to see what it is they don't want to see.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:05:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: and now for something completely different</title><link>http://godlizard.com/2010/01/and-now-for-something-completely-different/#comment-30920056</link><description>&lt;p&gt;oh no, did i do that to you? i'm so mean sometimes, i swear.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;sorry ٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:25:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: if religions were real: BEARS!</title><link>http://godlizard.com/2010/01/if-religions-were-real-bears/#comment-30433707</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Several? Only several? Heck, 42 kids got mauled over one or two of them insulting an old guy's shiny head. In LA, that would translate to several thousand spontaneous combustions on the 101/405 interchange in a single morning commute!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:56:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DEF \\ DEC \\ POSS - 100 POSTS!</title><link>http://ddp.kethcart.com/post/324092359#comment-29029638</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i love your Tumblr theme, I was into Tumblr for awhile but for some reason Posterous has become my favorite ... whatever this type of service is. Still have both, of course ... can't have too many of these things? It's weird, because I put a lot of effort into my tumblr theme, and nothing yet at Posterous, but ... maybe it's the fact it posts to plurk, so i can keep my karma? sorry for rambling in your comments, congrats on 100!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:21:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: world history, with the pope</title><link>http://godlizard.com/2009/12/world-history-with-the-pope/#comment-27870505</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I could watch it over and over again. And, I'm delighted that the Apture plugin turned that into one of those awesome Apture links :) &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:18:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Public Option Dead? Or Recrafted?</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/#comment-25231531</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, this is actually good, and it actually looks like it'll cost me what I estimated back a few dozen estimates ago, which is to say, an additional $500/mo over what I am paying now. Which is fine really. Current situation is that I have excellent insurance, and my domestic partner (I've been living with my son's father for 19 years. I won't marry him. Long story) has horrible insurance with dependent coverage that would -- maybe -- pay if there were bills over $5K for either of them. However that goes away after the first of the year because he's quitting his part time job to run a small nonprofit corp (no benefits). Meaning I have to add them both, which ... well, even if we went the option figured on the PDF thingy you were pointed to, would be the same as me adding them to my excellent coverage.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It was actually better to handle the out of pocket for the two of them myself with the huge deductible policy, I spend a lot less than $6K a year that way. But i can't go high-deductible, because I am one of those $1K/month med people (my generic Adderall costs a lot more than yours, maybe because it's 2/day?). And I can't split and pay one kind for them and one for me. And since, technically, I CAN insure them both, I WILL have to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Which is fine. I will need to make more money, but by next year, I will, so it's all good.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While I start looking for jobs in France. Naah, j/k, I wouldn't do that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;*ahem* anyone want to write me a recommendation on LinkedIn? Even better if it's written in French? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:50:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: vatican features 2Pac&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8216;Changes&amp;#8217; on its myspace playlist</title><link>http://godlizard.com/2009/12/vatican-features-tupacs-changes-on-myspace-playlist/#comment-24866333</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From CNN: The list was compiled by Father Giulio Neroni, artistic director of church publisher St Paul's Multimedia. He was also responsible for compiling the Vatican's recent Alma Mater album, which combined Gregorian chants and prayers with classical music and the voice of Pope Benedict XVI speaking in five languages.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The genres are very different from each other, but all these artists share the aim to reach the heart of good minded people," the Vatican wrote on its official MySpace Music page.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To see what they mean by reaching good-hearted people, I have added the lyrics in the "read more" area of the post. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I looked for some interpretations of the lyrics on the internet, this might explain: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"2pac speaks with more sense than any other rapper did and will ever do... probably because he sees the dark reality of life, puts them in his songs and through them, try to make a difference or at least break the ignorance in others... This song speaks of racial discrimination against the blacks... all i can add up to what 2pac is trying to get through to all of us is that before being black, white, brown or yellow skined... we are all human beings above all. "&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And perhaps the Vatican is attempting by choosing this song, to reach out to inner city youth? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:16:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: good news roundup</title><link>http://godlizard.com/2009/12/good-news-roundup/#comment-24769865</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been thinking that it would be a good thing to devote some energy to finding more positive stories, and supporting wholeheartedly anyone who speaks out in favor of mutual respect and peaceful coexistence. I was actually somewhat surprised to find all those things in my feed reader this evening, perhaps I need to add some search terms so I can seek out more positivity. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dotlizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:32:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>