Disqus - Latest Comments for mpodrazik

Re: Ruby on Rails vs. J2EE

mpodrazik — Sat, 03 May 2014 09:07:30 -0000

I think the question these days is what's best for implementing a REST interface for a Javascript client to hit. I prefer Java largely due to #1 & #3 above but also because it seems like there is a more well-trodden path to performance and scaling.

Kind of disagree on your PaaS point. I can deploy Java in App Engine for example.

Node is great. TBD whether it's any better on the maintainability and decoupling points than Rails. It's theoretically nice to be able to use the same language for server and client but I'm not sure how much that really matters.

Re: "Fixing" Slow Wake for MacBook Pro w/ Retina Display - Ewal.net

mpodrazik — Sun, 24 Mar 2013 08:16:33 -0000

Thank you! This was so annoying.

Re: The Death Star Is a Surprisingly Cost-Effective Weapons System

mpodrazik — Sat, 25 Feb 2012 17:08:49 -0000

Star Wars technology more advanced than Star Trek? Transporters? Holodecks? Data is at least as advanced as the best droids...

Re: Fucked in Park Slope - A Brooklyn Blog - Website Login

mpodrazik — Wed, 06 Jul 2011 10:58:53 -0000

There is a recall on certain GM models due to a problem with the wiper heaters causing fires. Bet it was this... http://consumerist.com/2010...

Re: State of the Smartphones: iPhone up, Android up, RIMM screwed

mpodrazik — Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:53:07 -0000

I don't agree. I think the future looks more like a 5-way split, more or less, with iOS, Android, RIM and Windows Phone 7 each with something like 20% and the remaining fifth going to misc. like WebOS, Meego, etc. Symbian is dead.

Maybe it isn't an even 5-way. Maybe Android has the largest minority share long-term (likely), or maybe iOS (possibly).

iOS still eclipses Android in installed base. That will probably change at some point, but you are right that that is the horse race.

RIM still eclipses both of 'em though, and their default corporate position is a huge advantage. They can't coast on that forever but they can for a long time.

Microsoft can probably buy their way into the market and even if they fail for the first couple of generations eventually they will be competitive. They are just not going to give up. The market is too important. It basically *IS* the market. If Microsoft can't be competitive in mobile it completely erodes their long-term prospects which is why they will keep banging on it until something shakes loose. This is the way they roll anyway. They always suck at first and then come on strong. Like RIM, too, they have their hooks into the enterprise with Exchange, Office, etc.

I also wouldn't be surprised by a RIM acquisition by Microsoft at some point. I actually can't believe that that didn't happen years ago. In that scenario I see a more-or-less 3-way split between iOS, Android and Windows(with all of RIM's corporate customers) and misc. remaining.

I have never really used WebOS other than playing a few minutes with other people's Pres but it seems nice. I just don't see HP being successful trying to follow Apple's strategy. Only Apple can follow the Apple strategy. If they were to open up WebOS to licensing then they could bite into Android and Windows. That's their best bet I think but don't necessarily see them doing it.

Re: My search for an ultralight iPhone 4 hard case

mpodrazik — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:26:24 -0000

It's not that dramatic - http://lh5.ggpht.com/_JHsU_...

In addition to that crack there are a few scrapes but wasn't a huge deal. Will attempt to avoid the same fate with the new 4 though.

So knowing what you know now about the Gumdrop would you get the Marware instead if you had a do over?

Re: My search for an ultralight iPhone 4 hard case

mpodrazik — Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:40:25 -0000

did you get one yet? thinking about this now as well. went "naked" with my 3g but after half a dozen drops on the sidewalk it was cracked and dented in a few places...

Re: Rumor: Apple Thinking About Buying ARM. iPhone Rivals To Sleep With The Fishes?

mpodrazik — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:34:00 -0000

Or they could get really nasty and jack up the rates for HTC but play alliances with whoever else was willing to play ball, (i.e. stop developing Android devices).

Re: Rumor: Apple Thinking About Buying ARM. iPhone Rivals To Sleep With The Fishes?

mpodrazik — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:27:59 -0000

If they purchased ARM and then shut off any licensees, it would be asking for anti-trust action from the US and I would imagine especially the EU.

More likely they would play games whereby they would continue to license, but jack up the rates and make sure that most promising innovations were kept Apple-proprietary so as to give iDevices a greater advantage in the market.

Re: My take on the Pre - Palm’s salvation.

mpodrazik — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:41:36 -0000

@howie yeah, my mom wants one too :) I do think Palm generally has a positive association with people as well.

In thinking about this more I actually do think that Google isn't really in competition with Apple and Palm as much as Microsoft.

Google doesn't need one particular piece of hardware running Android to be a hit in the way that Apple and Palm, (and RIM to the extent that they go after the consumer market), do since they don't make the hardware or make money on the hardware or licensing.

As all phones become smartphones, Android could be positioned as the choice of OS for manufacturers who are not Apple, Palm or RIM simply because it is free and modern and there. Your HTCs, LGs, etc. might just migrate to it as an enabling technology so that they can stay in the game.

Microsoft is sort of in the same position but Windows Mobile doesn't seem to be appealing to people so much these days and comes with licensing fees attached.

Android is going to be running on netbooks which would otherwise be running Windows.

So maybe Android never has the same brand in-your-faceness but could quietly emerge to capture a large segment of the market.

I wonder about Nokia. Will they continue to push Symbian? A combined Nokia and Palm would be interesting...

Re: My take on the Pre - Palm’s salvation.

mpodrazik — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:11:11 -0000

Yeah, a big reason the Mac, iPhone, etc. work so well is 'cause they are 'vertically integrated'

I'm a little surprised actually how much brand power Palm still has. I had kind of written them off a while ago yet have relatives asking about the merits of the Pre vs. iPhone weeks ago.

Contrast that to Android who I doubt many non-tech people are aware of at all...

Re: My take on the Pre - Palm’s salvation.

mpodrazik — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:56:12 -0000

Multiple OEMs. Forgetting about the netbook thing for a minute, the fact that there are supposed to be 18-20 Android phones on the market before the end of '09 is Google taking a page out of Microsoft's playbook, (except for the open source part ;)

There are advantages to having a really clear and controlled product line. This is "The Apple Way". There are also advantages to being ubiquitous, not worrying about the hardware so much and just the OS, "The Microsoft Way".

I think the iPhone/Android battle may be a regurgitation of the Apple/Microsoft battle in the early days.

Plus, I'm not sure if this is an advantage or not for Google but they are not actually trying to make any money on licensing fees since Android is open. On the one hand that sucks 'cause they won't be making money but on the other they don't care 'cause they're rich and are going at it more obliquely for mindshare or whatever...

It doesn't really matter ultimately whether it works or not since you're not going to be using Bing or Wolfram anytime soon regardless of the phone you've got. The worst case scenario for GOOG is basically neutral.

It might be naive but I almost believe it when Schmidt says he doesn't think they are in competition. The iPhone has actually been great for Google, after all. Pre will be great for Google. The rise of the smartphone in general is great for Google. If they can shape that future to whatever degree is possible with Android they will do it, but no matter what they win if the phone is an Internet device.

Re: My take on the Pre - Palm’s salvation.

mpodrazik — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:37:00 -0000

It will save them in the sense that they will not have to go under / sell out to another company, (at least not because they have no other choice).

Will it unseat Apple? No chance.

As you alluded to I think RIM has more to fear from Palm, (and Apple and Google/Android), than Apple or Google/Android do from Palm.

Apple loses some in the sense that they don't get to run away with the market, but that was not going to happen anyway.

I disagree with your Android vs. WebOS matchup though. I think the matchup is between Apple and Android, especially when Android netbooks arrive and if/when Apple releases a tablet.

I'm wondering if a Pre hit makes Palm attractive to RIM or Microsoft or Nokia...

Re: My thoughts on the Palm Pre Smartphone

mpodrazik — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:24:37 -0000

Palm is definitely back in the race, but I don't know where that puts them in the multi-year race you posit. The new OS looks sweet, but they are missing a key business advantage that the other players have.

Apple obviously redefined the market and are the team to beat, especially when combined with their dominant IPod position and ascendant Mac hardware/software. Everybody loves the brand. They are integrated. Nuff said.

RIM has historically been dominant among business users, the BlackBerry is ubiquitous. This can continue to be leveraged, (the client I'm at, for example, outlaws IPhone access to the corporate Exchange server but BlackBerries are supported). The movement of everybody to more powerful smart phones was inevitable. Their problem is that Apple captured everyone's attention at the critical tipping point with a killer product.

Android's big, while unproven, selling-point is that it's open source. Google is not the hardware maker and anybody can run the damn thing. They don't need to have these exclusive relationships with carriers since potentially many many handset makers will have it on many many devices on many many carriers. It's the Microsoft strategy vs. the Apple strategy, but with a free Windows license. Regardless of the features this is a very attractive option I would think.

Don't count out Nokia and Microsoft either. Windows Mobile sucks but it is impossible that Microsoft will allow all this action to go unanswered for long. The whole Azure/Live/Mesh combination could be a force to be reckoned with, and now that Symbian is open source as well who knows.

Anyway, the Pre appears to be very impressive, but from a one-foot-in-the-grave company exclusively partnered with the distant third-place carrier having their own problems (hemorrhaging customers, me included), its still gonna be tough road for them. They would need a big selling point. Now if they come out with a WiMAX-enabled version...

Re: Amazon to add Content Delivery Service, continues to kicks butt

mpodrazik — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:10:43 -0000

fan. there are very few compelling reasons left to not deploy on the AMZN stack at this point...

Re: Breakfast Links: Cuttlefish, The Rock & WWDC

mpodrazik — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:06:36 -0000

It's about time this interloper has finally stopped being referred to by a name to which he was never rightfully entitled... ;)

Re: Why is the internet so extreme? or No, your language is not dead.

mpodrazik — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 22:10:17 -0000

Perl is totally dead, so is JavaScript:
http://blog.symbiont.net/20...

Seriously though, I agree with you about the hype factor surrounding languages like Ruby. I think though that another contributing factor beyond general extremeness is growth rate. If you look at the job trends at indeed.com for an arbitrary selection of languages, (http://www.indeed.com/jobtr..., it shows perl beating out other dynamic languages like php, python and ruby, (although still behind c, java, c++ and c#).

If you check the relative scale though, (http://www.indeed.com/jobtr..., ruby is just off the chart. Yeah, you can say that because it's mindshare/marketshare is so small that it's easy for it to rack up big growth rates, and you'd be right, but big moves like that that are new are the definition of news, and that in turn feeds the blogs and the general zeitgeist.

The ruby hyperbole I think is on its way out. What is good though, I think, is a general acceptance of dynamic languages, and maybe more than that but a breaking down of peoples' inhibitions about language proliferation in general. That can only be good for something like perl once 6 is official, right?

Re: Google AppEngine & Amazon AWS

mpodrazik — Sun, 11 May 2008 19:52:09 -0000

RE: your virtual RackSpace idea, something like this may be a tool in the NOC:

http://www.rightscale.com/

I'm waiting for someone to move up to the next level of abstraction and effectively merge the appengine and AWS approaches. Something like a web framework based on [insert-favorite-framework-here] but with explicit supports for SimpleDB, SQS, S3, etc. as well as callbacks for notifying the master container about load conditions so that autonomous or rule-based VM instantiation (and reaping) can occur in response to traffic patterns.

A concept like that could be merged with a virtual hosting idea to give kinda the best of both worlds - flexibility and hands-offness...