<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for nbr</title><link>https://disqus.com/by/nbr/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://disqus.com/nbr/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 17:01:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Wherever We Go, We Bring the Weego 44s Portable Jump Starter</title><link>https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/weego-44s-portable-jump-starter-review/#comment-6757675968</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As of August 2025, the Amazon link on this page takes you to a different Weego product, the Weego 70, which costs twice as much as the 44s used to. The 22s seems to have disappeared, and the 44s is backordered on the Weego website (and has also doubled in price). Any new recommendations? I've gotten good use out of my Weego but gave it away to someone who was about to leave on a long road trip. I had planned to to replace it with the same unit, but no joy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 17:01:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As a Hapless New Homeowner, I Wish I’d Been Gifted This Cheap Box of Power Tools</title><link>https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/power-tools-new-homeowner-gift/#comment-6738200862</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As of July 2025, this kit is priced at $323 on the Home Depot website.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 09:00:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Emergency Light Bulb Was My Saving Grace During a Weeklong Power Outage</title><link>https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/nebo-blackout-backup-bulb-review/#comment-6656233450</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How quickly does it lose its charge if it isn't regularly switched on? Most of the frequently-used bulbs in my house are now smart bulbs, and I've gotten kind of hooked on the convenience. If I installed one of these, fully-charged, in a light that gets turned on only rarely, how long would it stay charged?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:20:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Exorbitant Cordless Geek Aire Fan Is Worth Every Penny</title><link>https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/blog/greek-aire-fan-worth-every-penny/#comment-6548551609</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wirecutter appears to have essentially repudiated this recommendation in their   &lt;a href="https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-cordless-fans/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-cordless-fans/"&gt;9/11/24 article on cordless fans (link)&lt;/a&gt;  -  (the GeekAire "couldn't compare" to the new recommendations).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:37:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Kitchen Torch Is One You Can Use Every Day. And Yes, You’ll Want To.</title><link>https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-kitchen-torch-whip-it-motif/#comment-6548527431</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Isn't Iwatani the brand you see in professional kitchens most often for things like brûléing (not searing meat)? Anyone have a sense of how Iwatani compares to this one?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:45:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How the Dallas Cheerleaders Achieve a Sweat-Proof Look, Even Through Scorching Performances</title><link>https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/guides/how-dallas-cowboy-cheerleaders-stay-sweat-proof/#comment-6524370764</link><description>&lt;p&gt;my theory is that Wirecutter is making a play for Strategist readers. The Strategist went behind a paywall what, six weeks ago, and there's a sudden increase in articles on beauty products. And yes, I am mad at myself that I clicked on this. And yes I looked at the photos.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 23:13:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Water Bottles | The Wirecutter</title><link>http://thewirecutter.com/reviews/best-water-bottle/#comment-6474862141</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Costco sells a white-label version of the Takeya bottle for much less money, maybe $20 for a two-pack. It's sold as "ThermoFlask", comes with the straw lid, and is available in limited colors.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 22:52:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Resistance Bands</title><link>https://thewirecutter.com/reviews/best-resistance-bands/#comment-6427889206</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Bodylastics.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Bodylastics.com"&gt;Bodylastics.com&lt;/a&gt; shows &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; products currently out of stock. Is the company still a going concern?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 14:29:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Toward a Labor Theory of Generation X</title><link>https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/toward-a-labor-theory-of-generation-x/#comment-5189229428</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Reminds me of the "there's always work at the Post Office" scene in Hollywood Shuffle.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:17:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Costello’s office again target of protesters</title><link>http://www.dailylocal.com/general-news/20170419/costellos-office-again-target-of-protesters#comment-3266910766</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The question is, are you calling it "freedom" when you don't have to pay taxes? And if so, what do you call it when you do pay taxes?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:09:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Costello’s office again target of protesters</title><link>http://www.dailylocal.com/general-news/20170419/costellos-office-again-target-of-protesters#comment-3266897990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, you didn't answer my question at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:03:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Costello’s office again target of protesters</title><link>http://www.dailylocal.com/general-news/20170419/costellos-office-again-target-of-protesters#comment-3266875872</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So you're saying that if the government gives you a tax break, that's freedom? What is it when you pay taxes? Slavery? If that's what you think, why did the founding fathers say we needed a military, a postal service, a court system, etc.? Did they think those were all going to be volunteer jobs?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:52:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Costello’s office again target of protesters</title><link>http://www.dailylocal.com/general-news/20170419/costellos-office-again-target-of-protesters#comment-3266766169</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very proud of these folks for getting out there and standing up for truly American values. In the richest country on earth, nobody should be denied basic healthcare because of an inability to pay. Keep it up. It's not about party politics. It's about right and wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:51:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kennesaw State Professor Arrested for Protesting Campus Carry Legislation Later Passed By Georgia Senate</title><link>https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2016/03/13/kennesaw-state-professor-arrested-protesting-campus-carry-legislation-later#comment-2587522174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So the reason we know she's guilty is because she was arrested? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:12:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Protect Your Daughters; Turn Them Into Corporations</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/christianpiatt/2014/07/protect-your-daughters-turn-them-into-corporations/#comment-1469770786</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I learned two things from this comment section:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Using an IUD or taking Plan B = "killing babies" &lt;br&gt;- Health care services paid for by an insurance plan (which you probably pay at least part of the premiums for, and which is supplied as part of a compensation package at your job) = "free" health care&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 15:57:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The &amp;#8220;Asian F&amp;#8221;: Perils of a Model Minority</title><link>https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2013/12/18/asian-fs-and-the-idea-of-asian-achievement/#comment-1169648906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd be interested to know how the actual numbers compare to the classic high-achieving stereotype of Asian kids, and particularly how it breaks down more granularly (e.g., families of Chinese, Korean, or Southeast Asian origin, etc.). I went to a school where there was a large Asian population, most of whom were children of Vietnamese and Cambodian refugee families. Locally they were NOT stereotyped as academic high achievers -- but rather as dangerous gangsters. But that was a long time ago ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 22:37:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What The Color of Your Urine Says About You (Infographic)</title><link>http://health.clevelandclinic.org/2013/10/what-the-color-of-your-urine-says-about-you-infographic/#comment-1152453062</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It does, however, mean that you will have very EXPENSIVE urine.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 22:31:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Dispute Brews in Austin Over &amp;#039;Namaste&amp;#039; Beer Trademark</title><link>http://kutnews.org/post/dispute-brews-austin-over-namaste-beer-trademark#comment-1063417519</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, then you're not really talking about the charge of cultural appropriation; you're saying there's something fundamentally wrong with the legal idea of trademarks that use common words. It doesn't really have anything to do with the fact that it's "culturally embedded," as you said above -- it's just the fact that it's a common word. But that's how our trademark law works -- you can, in fact, trademark common words. If you think that ought to change, that's a whole other issue, but it's not Dogfish's fault.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2013 09:27:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Dispute Brews in Austin Over &amp;#039;Namaste&amp;#039; Beer Trademark</title><link>http://kutnews.org/post/dispute-brews-austin-over-namaste-beer-trademark#comment-1062739988</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why? There are trademarks on "Hello," on "Zen," on "Moses," on "Apple" .... I mean, hell, UPS has a trademark on the color brown. How is this any more ridiculous?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2013 14:13:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Scottish tabloid libels the Churches of Christ</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/getreligion/2013/09/a-scottish-tabloid-libels-the-churches-of-christ/#comment-1035514056</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, okay, that makes sense. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 11:58:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Scottish tabloid libels the Churches of Christ</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/getreligion/2013/09/a-scottish-tabloid-libels-the-churches-of-christ/#comment-1035372324</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not trying to be obstreperous, but libel is a crime, right? So aren't you publicly alleging that the Daily Record violated the law? Honestly, I'm asking out of curiosity. I don't know how the law works in these situations. Presumably, if a newspaper published an article with the headline that, say, "George Conger embezzles funds from Patheos" and it turned out not to be true, wouldn't the paper be exposing itself to criminal liability (for libelling you), even if they claimed it were merely an opinion and not malicious in intent?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 09:36:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Scottish tabloid libels the Churches of Christ</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/getreligion/2013/09/a-scottish-tabloid-libels-the-churches-of-christ/#comment-1035358350</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not a lawyer, but by publicly alleging libel, aren't you potentially exposing yourself to libel charges in turn?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 09:21:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dear Facebook:  If This Isn’t Hate Speech, Then What Is?</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/kathyschiffer/2013/08/dear-facebook-if-this-isnt-hate-speech-then-what-is/#comment-1025540484</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it your opinion that there are no anti-Jewish, anti-Muslim, or anti-gay pages on Facebook? Several comments have made this point, but I'm curious as to whether you actually believe Christians are being singled out for "hate" (what some might call ridicule) more than the other groups you name. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 15:46:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Snickering at FoxNews while getting duped by &amp;#8216;Zealot&amp;#8217; author</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/getreligion/2013/07/snickering-at-foxnews-while-getting-duped-by-zealot-author/#comment-981506745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Joe Carter , did you know that within the academic field of the study of religion, "history of religions" or "history of religion" is a kind of old-fashioned synonym for "religious studies" or "the study of religion"? (It comes from the German, phenomenological roots of the field, i.e., Religionsgeschichte.)  It doesn't have anything to do with having a degree in history. In departments or institutions that call the discipline "history of religions," "sociology of religion" is an area of concentration or specialization within the discipline of "history of religions." A person who identifies him- or herself as a "historian of religion", to an academic in the field, is simply saying "I study religion." Easily misunderstood from a position outside the field, but hey, that's just how it is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 12:20:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Morality Without Religion | Frans de Waal | Big Think</title><link>http://bigthink.com/ideas/morality-without-religion#comment-902506182</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The big problem with all these sorts of discussions is that there's a basic failure to define terms. What is meant here by "religion"? Is religion defined primarily in terms of a Tylorian "belief in Spiritual Beings," or maybe ritual practices, or communal identity and solidarity, or even prescribed, authoritative codes of conduct? The notion that religion is a human universal is usually made meaningless by the fact that "religion" is understood so vaguely and intuitively as to render the claim empty. If we're talking about belief in spiritual forces, does that mean that someone who doesn't subscribe to any traditional religious tradition but who takes horoscopes seriously, or who thinks crystals have healing powers, is "actually" religious without realizing it? If we're talking about the existence of enduring institutions, traditions, symbols, codes of conduct, and authoritative identities, is the military a religious institution? Why don't we consider the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag a prayer, or a football game a ritual? Usually people splutter with annoyance when confronted with such questions, but their answers almost always end up circular in nature: nationalistic rituals aren't religious because they don't involve any "ultimate (i.e., religious) commitments"; New Age crystal users aren't religious because their beliefs don't connect them with any "genuine" (i.e. religious) tradition.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:13:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>