<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Abhishek</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-f589a695" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/Abhishek/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:31:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: RSS is how the news flows (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/08/26/rssIsHowTheNewsFlows.html#comment-15437225</link><description>In my opinion RSS is the "Thread that weaves the web".&lt;br&gt;Rejecting RSS is like rejecting HTTP, as it has become such a backbone technology.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree, that most people don't like the application layer (GReader, Netvibes etc). There is lot of room for innovation there.&lt;br&gt;The critical innovation needed is to figure out how to filter through the data and deliver the right amount and relevant data to the user.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:31:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Drawing Heat After Key Enterprise Announcement</title><link>http://abhishek.tiwari.com/2007/09/10/google-drawing-heat-after-enterprise-market-announcement/#comment-15435383</link><description>Pankaj,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good observation. I agree with the fear not lasting long.&lt;br&gt;Also with announcements like Amazon's VPS these fears will slowly wane away.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the comparison link. Will check it out and let you know.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Abhishek</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:51:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google a Day, Keeps the Doctor Away</title><link>http://abhishek.tiwari.com/2007/08/15/google-a-day-keeps-the-doctor-away/#comment-7256034</link><description>Sure go ahead</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:52:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Discontinuing the Cable TV Service</title><link>http://abhishek.tiwari.com/2009/01/25/discontinuing-the-cable-tv-service/#comment-7159035</link><description>Oscar,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree with you. TV networks are dragging their feet in adopting the new medium as they dont know how to play in it. Their future is very similar to the print media.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In my opinion they must fund innovation in the web media to be able to monetize that medium without implementing subscription models. Creative advertising, personalization etc are some of the areas to look at.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:01:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Discontinuing the Cable TV Service</title><link>http://abhishek.tiwari.com/2009/01/25/discontinuing-the-cable-tv-service/#comment-5557912</link><description>True.&lt;br&gt;However, in that "time shifting" model, you are still paying for content you don't watch.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also you have to take premium packages to access HBO programming. Not to mention that the HD content would need larger (more expensive) Tivo box.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Discontinuing the Cable TV Service</title><link>http://abhishek.tiwari.com/2009/01/25/discontinuing-the-cable-tv-service/#comment-5557085</link><description>Huh?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:53:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Discontinuing the Cable TV Service</title><link>http://abhishek.tiwari.com/2009/01/25/discontinuing-the-cable-tv-service/#comment-5553292</link><description>Yes, I am going towards the OTA antenna model, which should get me local HD channels.&lt;br&gt;Also I do watch HULU, Comedy Central on my Boxee over Apple TV.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My goal is to watch all the content on my big screen and not my laptop. That has been a peeve of mine. Actually I watch all the Vodcasts on my TV too. You know, I spent considerable money buying that, so I should be able to watch everything there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS -- Any suggestions on the antenna.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:57:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sheky Log</title><link>http://shekylog.tiwari.com/post/44706868#comment-5478663</link><description>Nice!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder if you can post that image here as a comment somehow, instead of the link.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:22:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If the news is important it will find me: my social map (Seesmic du jour 115)</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2008/04/if-the-news-is.html#comment-299882</link><description>Couldn't agree with you more.&lt;br&gt;Now when you talk about centralizing the information again back to your blog, do you mean just getting a simplified / integrated view?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:32:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts On FriendFeed</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri.html#comment-262168</link><description>I integrated it on my FF account too.&lt;br&gt;BTW, do comments left within FF (in response to Disqus comments) go back to Disqus?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kinda like the Twitter response.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:20:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sheky Log</title><link>http://shekylog.tiwari.com/post/28889730#comment-239320</link><description>Thanks man. I am trying to post atleast once a week</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:57:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone SDK, the New Walled Garden?</title><link>http://abhishek.tiwari.com/2008/03/08/iphone-sdk-the-new-walled-garden/#comment-214066</link><description>Raj,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for quoting the line from Spider Man. I do get your point and must say that I kinda agree with it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most users don't know how an application will behave on the handset. On PCs it maybe okay but mobile handsets is another story.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However at the same time I don't like Apple being the sole gatekeeper controlling the access. It gives Apple the complete power to deny access to anyone who remotely does not meet their criteria.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is what I propose. Apple should continue to offer the AppStore solution. Developers can host their apps for discoverability and distribution on AppStore. However Apple does not prevent any application from running on the iPhone. Apple should merely indicate the type of application and provide user's a warning system. This is very much like the movie rating system. Apple can have an application rating system in place.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most users can utilize this system to download and install applications. If an app has a bad rating as bandwidth hog or spam friendly, Apple can mark it so. User's then can avoid these apps if they choose to. On the other hand Power users (you and me) can still continue to download applications without any hiccup.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other similar approaches can be taken. End of the day I don't want Apple to be yet another gatekeeper standing in front of the walled garden. Otherwise I don't see any difference between them and the carrier. Bear in mind carrier's use the same reasons (as Apple) to prevent apps on their handsets.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:27:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone SDK, the New Walled Garden?</title><link>http://abhishek.tiwari.com/2008/03/08/iphone-sdk-the-new-walled-garden/#comment-213849</link><description>Sean,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yep your assessment is correct. Historically they have done that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However I still am concerned about the AppStore model where they control the applications and the business model.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ideally a user should be able to download an application from anywhere and run it however they want. A true open device will hand the control to the end user.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:39:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sheky Log</title><link>http://shekylog.tiwari.com/post/24673404#comment-116492</link><description>Rub your belly like homer when you say that</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:53:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Caption contest</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/01/caption-contest_22.html#comment-95129</link><description>Dude, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They are sleeping....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:52:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Apps on CrackBerrys, RIM FORE!</title><link>http://abhishek.tiwari.com/2007/12/31/google-apps-on-crackberrys-rim-fore/#comment-54482</link><description>Testing Disqus once more...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 02:16:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sheky Log - Headed to</title><link>http://shekylog.tiwari.com/post/21085028#comment-32181</link><description>Yeah that sounds about right :-(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:34:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sheky Log - Headed to</title><link>http://shekylog.tiwari.com/post/21085028#comment-29949</link><description>Santa Cruz...&lt;br&gt;With your LTI peeps</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:16:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sheky Log - Mobile email post</title><link>http://shekylog.tiwari.com/post/21073117#comment-29623</link><description>Testing disqus comments</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:17:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google's phone should be good (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/03/googlesPhoneShouldBeGood.html#comment-8014</link><description>Dave,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree with your thinking. Google can differentiate heavily. Almost all OEMs (including Apple) have focused mainly on the hardware. Google's focus will be the software and opening up the mobile ecosystem.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have put together some thoughts in my 3 part series. Check out the first 2 and let me know what you think:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://abhishek.tiwari.com/2007/10/21/gphone-if-i-built-it-part-1/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://abhishek.tiwari.com/2007/10/21/gphone-if...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://abhishek.tiwari.com/2007/10/30/gphone-if-i-built-it-part-2/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://abhishek.tiwari.com/2007/10/30/gphone-if...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would love to hear your thoughts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ps -- Will be posting the 3rd part tomorrow.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Abhishek</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abhishek</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 21:13:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>