http://disqus.com/people/Attitude/enFri, 07 Aug 2009 06:16:42 -0000http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/10_no_4_days_to_become_a_social_media_expert/#comment-14421323Sarcasm in writing isn't easy to convey as the writer intends but I think you managed to do it and make your point. At least it made me laugh this morning. Thank you Chris.AttitudeFri, 07 Aug 2009 06:16:42 -0000http://banannie.disqus.com/private_the_wobbling_continues_but_the_bouncing_has_let_up/#comment-9974635For a moment I thought I was reading about me. I, too, prefer web to phone, wrote tons I chose not to publish in the past few months, have been reconnecting on FB with distant friends, etc. Social media is a more elegant means of intermittently tending to valued but distant relationships. For one thing social media renders unnecessary answering the "so what's new" question non-web friends are fond of asking when they finally get us on the phone after months or years.AttitudeTue, 26 May 2009 19:23:05 -0000http://banannie.disqus.com/very_random_sxswi_highlights/#comment-7384972Oh wow, I totally forgot to link-bait ;)!banannieFri, 20 Mar 2009 17:56:27 -0000http://banannie.disqus.com/very_random_sxswi_highlights/#comment-7384908For including images of "A listers" and not link-baiting the post I am once again reminded how classy you are. Glad you had fun. You deserve it.AttitudeFri, 20 Mar 2009 17:53:16 -0000http://banannie.disqus.com/facebook_connects_the_dots/#comment-6044937Reminds me of a spirograph.AttitudeFri, 06 Feb 2009 10:56:29 -0000http://flotsamjetsam.disqus.com/tag_i039m_it_flickr_meme/#comment-4428504Very good. And thank you, Adele for the kind things you said.AttitudeTue, 16 Dec 2008 10:10:52 -0000http://flotsamjetsam.disqus.com/a_wish_for_my_american_cousins/#comment-3622513Thank you, Adele, for your warm sentiments of good will and peace. People are fundamentally well-intended, I believe, and though we may occasionally take a leave of absence we somehow find our way back once the lights come on and the shadows of fear and doubt vanish.AttitudeSat, 08 Nov 2008 10:13:34 -0000http://loiclemeur.disqus.com/what_defines_reputation_in_social_software/#comment-744233This is about reputation of a company more than reputation of its consumers, isn't it? As such, it becomes an issue of corporate security. What company leaves security to its customers? No security system is perfect as the need for customer accessibility must be balanced with the need to protect company interests. Porn appears on YouTube but is immediately removed by company staff once discovered. Perhaps security is a task of reasonable diligence by Seesmic staff rather than defer to special users whose personal objectives may not be company objectives. Temporarily holding a video for review if flagged can be a short term solution without resorting to complicated ratings systems of users deputized to act in the interest of others.AttitudeWed, 25 Jun 2008 07:47:04 -0000