<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for BillSeitz</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-a8e159ba" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/BillSeitz/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:15:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: TiddlyWeb Dev/Deploy Workshop</title><link>http://cdent.tumblr.com/post/214629671#comment-20240498</link><description>Is there page anywhere describing apps that build on top of TiddlyWeb?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:15:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hosted Mongo</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/hosted-mongo.html#comment-20042535</link><description>I'd have concerns about the overhead of every db hit from my app-server going over the public net.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:56:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Web and Education: We Need Scale!</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/190217323#comment-16813780</link><description>I'm not sure what this "platform" is offering beyond the web itself? Consistent structured reviews/ratings?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:45:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Health care in a nutshell (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/08/27/healthCareInANutshell.html#comment-15591221</link><description>Part of the problem comes from wanting "health insurance" to pay for every doctor visit. That's a group purchase system, not insurance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, Peter Drucker said that we would have had universal health insurance during the Eisenhower administration, but the UAW blocked it (wanting it to be a "benefit" *they* could take credit for, specifically for their members).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/z2003-08-11-DruckerUniversalHealthcare" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/z2003-08-11-Dr...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:40:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There's a missing product (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/07/01/theresAMissingProduct.html#comment-12052614</link><description>I think, as you note, the real problem is that many people will not check the information available: it's more efficient *for them* to just ask.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some solutions already available&lt;br&gt;* FriendFeed groups&lt;br&gt;* Dopplr&lt;br&gt;* &lt;a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=davewiner+reboot" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://search.twitter.com/search?q=davewiner+re...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:35:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederic's corner - mobile, social media, politics</title><link>http://fredericguarino.tumblr.com/post/133517017#comment-11978026</link><description>So you're taking the objection of an existing insurer seriously?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(I'm sure there is some "deceptive marketing" go on, because people are new at shopping for high-deductible insurance. But that's not a great excuse for no-change (or no-incremental-change)...)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:34:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Need Some 15 and 30 Second Spots? Hire Your User Base.</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/06/need-some-15-and-30-second-spots-hire-your-user-base.html#comment-11699193</link><description>Hey, it only cost $7k to make ElMariachi!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/RobertRodriguez" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/RobertRodriguez&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:46:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Need Some 15 and 30 Second Spots? Hire Your User Base.</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/06/need-some-15-and-30-second-spots-hire-your-user-base.html#comment-11698983</link><description>Is this for online-use only, or might they actual buy TV ad-time to show? The focus on exact-duration spots makes me wonder...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:41:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fred Wilson Dot VC</title><link>http://fredwilson.vc/post/121094761#comment-10692633</link><description>A flip-flopper!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It would be cool to know who these folks are... (aides vs grunts) (the way those 3 heads are at the same level and all chopped off, seems intentional...) (hey is that Dick Cheney?)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:57:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Synthesis </title><link>http://cdent.tumblr.com/post/119454584#comment-10602163</link><description>We paleo-wiki types remind me of the old LotusAgenda and EccoPro guys, preaching to the people who don't know what they're missing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One argument is that wikis moved beyond the use of people who like to think/reflect, into the greater number who don't.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 20:53:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet Bank of Content </title><link>http://cdent.tumblr.com/post/116865746#comment-10601003</link><description>JasonKolb has similar ideas...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.jasonkolb.com/weblog/2006/08/reinventing_the_3.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.jasonkolb.com/weblog/2006/08/reinven...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:36:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A quick overview of why healthcare is so expensive</title><link>http://blog.jayparkinsonmd.com/post/118956304#comment-10597405</link><description>Except that his preferred solution seems to be to force doctors into forming cooperatives that self-police for the common good, like the Mayo Clinic. The fact that most of those groups would *not* behaving like Mayo is ignored.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:43:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter as coral reef, cont'd (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/05/28/twitterAsCoralReefContd.html#comment-10258885</link><description>Note that FriendFeed can bring in your Disqus posts as well as tweets. Which isn't the same thing as what you're suggesting, but another spin...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 10:43:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hacking Education </title><link>http://www.unionsquareventures.com/2009/05/hacking_education.html#comment-9490659</link><description>In retrospect, it would have been good to include at the meeting (a) a homeschooling parent, and (b) an un-schooling advocate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 08:18:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Didn't PubSub Become Twitter?</title><link>http://www.windley.com/archives/2009/05/why_didnt_pubsub_become_twitter.shtml#comment-9326447</link><description>I suspect that SMS provided, along with novelty, a rationalization for the message-size-limit which drove the cultural acceptance of tiny posts. If you had tried to launch a microblogging service without SMS, I think you would have had too much resistance.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 11:05:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let The Students Teach</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/04/let-the-students-teach.html#comment-8827096</link><description>Large-scale student-teaching: Bell-Lancaster Method.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell-Lancaster_method" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell-Lancaster_method&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:36:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: /ambivalence</title><link>http://ambivalence.tumblr.com/post/99642928#comment-8649042</link><description>And any sufficiently advanced cluelessness is indistinguishable from malice.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:03:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If Twitter Is Your RSS Reader ...</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/04/if-twitter-is-your-rss-reader-.html#comment-8632419</link><description>You don't need a room, just an account, and you tie your twitter acct and your blog feed to it. Then both show up. (Then add last.fm, delicious, flickr, goodreads....)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:12:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling The Company Back To The Founders</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/04/selling-the-company-back-to-the-founders.html#comment-8100233</link><description>I'm pretty sure there's enough uptake that you can make free all-VoIP calls amongst Gizmo, asterisk, and lots of campus VoIP systems, right?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:20:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It’s The Netbook, Stupid</title><link>http://blog.tomevslin.com/2009/04/its-the-netbook-stupid.html#comment-8094936</link><description>Pls nudge toward SIP-based VoIP instead of Skype.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:11:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling The Company Back To The Founders</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/04/selling-the-company-back-to-the-founders.html#comment-8094516</link><description>I think Google would rather have a SIP-based VoIP service. Skype is another walled garden.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 08:21:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TiddlyWeb + IMAP</title><link>http://cdent.tumblr.com/post/89803274#comment-7728936</link><description>Do you define a sister-wiki-space, so you can link wikiwords in emails to wiki pages?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:07:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Book Market Stares At Ubiquity</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/03/the-book-market-stares-at-ubiquity.html#comment-7465074</link><description>The few stats Amazon *has* released make me think that their main *unit sales* have been nearly-free public-domain titles.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/z2009-02-12-Kindle10PctAmazonSales" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/z2009-02-12-Ki...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:15:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Book Market Stares At Ubiquity</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/03/the-book-market-stares-at-ubiquity.html#comment-7465028</link><description>If a core NetBook vendor implemented the fold-around design of the OLPC and bigger tablets, and had a phone-card built-in, would that get close?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:10:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Book Market Stares At Ubiquity</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/03/the-book-market-stares-at-ubiquity.html#comment-7464822</link><description>Well, Amazon already lets authors self-publish through their ecosystem.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;*And* they let those authors buy better visibility (ads).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, if we follow the Shirky model of FilterThenPublish being an obsolete process, Amazon is getting pretty close to being a publisher already.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillSeitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:52:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>