<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ChrisR</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-7e1c72d8" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/ChrisR/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:33:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Electric cars vs. biofuels: The presidential energy debate heats up</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/06/23/electric-cars-vs-biofuels-the-presidential-energy-debate-heats-up/#comment-734319</link><description>In my opinion, there is just too much "social engineering" going on here.  These matters should be settled in the marketplace with individuals making their own buying and selling decisions. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Based on these voluntary decisions, producers will know *what* to produce and in *what quantity.* Subsidies and tax credits are all arbitrary...and can lead to nothing but more problems and imbalances in the future.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisR</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:33:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Vision For Social Media</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/06/my-vision-for-s.html#comment-568069</link><description>Ok...I think I took you too literally...understood.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisR</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 16:16:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Vision For Social Media</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/06/my-vision-for-s.html#comment-567997</link><description>The term "every single human being" is pretty bold....Just look at the tribe that was discovered a few days ago...They're a part of "every single human being."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What if they will fight to the death to avoid "posting their thoughts and experiences?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are they to be forced? By who?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisR</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:01:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Dealing With Capacity Overload and "Laying Off" Features</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/dealing-with-capacity-overload-and.html#comment-567374</link><description>Here's how I'd answer some of Louis' questions:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;***Do you, as a user, have an absolute right to all your archives, ever?***&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If, while signing up to Twitter, it is explained that I'll only have access to the last 15 days of tweets, and all others will be deleted, I see no problem there. However, once you have unlimited access, taking that away does not sit well. People don't like things being taken away. So the archive restriction needs to be spelled out on day one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;***Do you have the right to demand that once features are added, they never be removed?***&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think if you're a paying user, you're probably entitled to a refund...since the original deal has been broken...(depends on the particular situation though)... If you're a non-paying user, you obviously have the right to move on to another service.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;***And do services have an obligation to scale up their hardware and infrastructure to keep you happy? Would you help fund their upgrades?***&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the service ceases to work, like Twitter recently, yes they do have an obligation to scale up...if they want to keep their users.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Twitter were to start charging its users, I'm sure there are plenty of people who would pay (depending on the price, and if their friends are going to pay too)...However, Twitter would lose a lot of people too...especially if there are other free alternatives like FriendFeed, Pownce, Jaiku...etc.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisR</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 11:58:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Developers Are People Too, Don't Forget</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/developers-are-people-too-dont-forget.html#comment-555027</link><description>It's always nice to reflect upon the qualities of the entrepreneur...After all, this is a person who invests his/her time, money, and resources in satisfying the urgent demands of consumers (or users).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sure, many will forecast incorrectly, and their creations will end up in the so called "deadpool," but I find it very admirable that the entrepreneurs took the risk anyway. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our lives would be quite primitive, and our standard of living a lot lower, without these key individuals.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisR</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:48:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Dropped the Ball on Jaiku</title><link>http://www.sarahintampa.com/sarah/2008/05/29/google-dropped-the-ball-on-jaiku.html#comment-550514</link><description>I can't agree more...I wonder why they dropped the ball and let FriendFeed swoop in (with a very similar service).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, I'm sure the average Google account holder has no idea about Twitter or FriendFeed, so perhaps Google is keeping Jaiku in the holster for a later date.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisR</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 12:57:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keep Your Eyes On FriendFeed: It May Be The Google Of Social Networks</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/05/23/keep-your-eyes-on-friendfeed-the-google-of-social-networks/#comment-524007</link><description>Great points!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FF has largely replaced Google Reader for me as well..I use Google Reader as a backup, to catch up on stuff I may have missed, and for sharing stories.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also believe FF is taking on Twitter...Once FF adds SMS and XMPP - watch out!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisR</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 11:34:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Blogosphere&amp;#8217;s Changing Opinions on FriendFeed</title><link>http://codingexperiments.com/archives/81#comment-487930</link><description>"Noise" is obviously a subjective term. A conversation can begin from just about anything, including what some consider to be noise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think one of the keys to really enjoying FriendFeed is to make peace with the fact that you don't "have to" read everything. If you feel like you do, then FriendFeed can be intimidating.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think if you treat it like a constant, never-ending stream that you participate in, there's lots of value and opportunities buried in the so-called "noise."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisR</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 21:18:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Personal Blogging With Logdit</title><link>http://www.sarahintampa.com/sarah/2008/05/16/personal-blogging-with-logdit.html#comment-481329</link><description>I think it's an interesting idea...however like you mentioned, the competition is stiff...Even WordPress has a setting where you can make your blog private. Logdit will have to really distinguish itself.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisR</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:04:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bring Google Reader To Your Desktop With ReadAIR</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/bring-google-reader-to-your-desktop-with-readair/#comment-475508</link><description>One of my reservations was the fact that there weren't any keyboard shortcuts...Nice to read that they've been implemented...Looking forward to seeing how this app progresses.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisR</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:58:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>