<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of Eyebee</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/Eyebee/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:52:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook Could Eliminate 75% of Its Servers by Changing Their Code</title><link>http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/12/facebook-could-eliminate-75-of-its-servers-by-changing-their-code.php#comment-26899785</link><description>agreed Virtualization is not a magic bullet; but as FB uses a clustered system for its webservers &amp; backend servers for the majority of the DB load. Webservers don't tend to be heavy on CPU as much as they are on network &amp; memory load; which is where virtualization can pay off. Plus in all the VM clusters I've worked on each physical box had 6+ network ports. And to a certain degree throwing more memory &amp; cpu at a box doesn't fix it, just delays the big crash. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't know how or if FB seperates out their workload by timezones/countries. But theoretically they could put US &amp; Asia VMs on the same box as they'd be under heavier loads at different hours. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And with the current beta system that VMware is testing where physical boxes can be powered down/up as VMs need more juice thus another proposed saving</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">needcaffeine</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:52:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heavy vog on Oahu</title><link>http://billso.com/2008/04/26/heavy-vog-on-oahu/#comment-23686895</link><description>It's been fine for the last 4 weeks. We get vog from time to time, and the last brutal batch floated through during October 2009.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">billso</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:10:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: billso.com may be down for 2 days</title><link>http://billso.com/2009/11/18/outage/#comment-23555337</link><description>Ack! I'm sorry I botched your name, David. I've fixed it now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">billso</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:50:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A quick explanation of copyright law</title><link>http://billso.com/2007/07/19/copyright-diagram/#comment-21336085</link><description>Please do! Thanks for the comment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">billso</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:32:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bloglines is on life support &amp;#8211; are Friendfeed and twitter next?</title><link>http://billso.com/2009/08/12/bloglines/#comment-16317847</link><description>Twitter was conceived as an extension of text messaging, but it's become more than that - it's a platform for authentication and processes. Even if microblogging dies off, we'll still have services like Twitter and laconi.ca that developers can use.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">billso</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:50:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bloglines is on life support &amp;#8211; are Friendfeed and twitter next?</title><link>http://billso.com/2009/08/12/bloglines/#comment-16317704</link><description>I agree - I've been on Twitter for 17 months and I'm still learning new ways to tweet effectively.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">billso</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:47:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Upgrading to Snow Leopard</title><link>http://billso.com/2009/09/07/upgrading-to-snow-leopard/#comment-16316928</link><description>I have a list of my favorite Mac software at &lt;a href="http://billso.com/mac/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://billso.com/mac/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">billso</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:32:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HawTel to offer naked DSL and faster downloads</title><link>http://billso.com/2007/08/18/hawtel-naked-dsl/#comment-16316686</link><description>Hawaiian Tel has $20/month plans. I'm paying $50 for 11 mbps.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">billso</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:28:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Coffee</title><link>http://www.gothamgal.com/gotham_gal/2009/08/coffee.html#comment-14521713</link><description>They're based in Philadelphia, but they have an office &amp; cafe in NYC. I think in TriBeCa.   Can't remember where though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">needcaffeine</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:50:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter and Major League Baseball: A Missed Opportunity</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/14/twitter-mlb/#comment-12651343</link><description>He's managing the American League in the All-Star Game tonight, so Joe's twitter feed is actually relevant today. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">billso</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:47:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter and Major League Baseball: A Missed Opportunity</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/14/twitter-mlb/#comment-12648256</link><description>MLB is hanging in there. Can't say the same about NASCAR!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">billso</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:42:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FileTwt: Fast File Sharing on Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/filetwt/#comment-9936143</link><description>Better than Scribd? I'll definitely have to check it out. Thanks, Bob!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">onlinedesign</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:01:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Barriers to Reaching Your Audience &amp; Customers</title><link>http://danblank.com/blog/2009/05/15/the-barriers-to-reaching-your-audience-customers/#comment-9787722</link><description>Well spoken indeed. (I am really glad I found your blog. It's quite inspiring).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">onlinedesign</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 07:24:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Seven Gates of Hell</title><link>http://czarism.com/the-seven-gates-of-hell#comment-8933996</link><description>approvw</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">czar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 14:41:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sell Your Twitter Name for Cash with Tweexchange</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/01/sell-your-twitter-name/#comment-8904129</link><description>Agreed - this scheme seems to violate the Twitter TOS.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">billso</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:25:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Pages Become the Newest Ad Platform</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-page-sponsorships/#comment-8643377</link><description>Reply to SS: There is nothing wrong with corporate symbols. In fact, some of them actually inspire us to do better in life. If they sponsored a charity page on a Facebook page, that would be super! I would like to see everyone active in social media adopt the "Twitter Twollars" approach and use social media to encourage corporate responsibility. That's all. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This was a super great comment thread and I thank you for the engaging conversation. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[Right now in South Carolina, I have dear friends that have been evacuated from the still raging fires in Myrtle Beach, so I will not be re-joining this thread right now. I will be Devil's Advocate another time].</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">onlinedesign</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:20:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Pages Become the Newest Ad Platform</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/23/facebook-page-sponsorships/#comment-8619791</link><description>Tyler, I agree with you. too. My concern is that us Facebook users are already suffering from “Facebook Application Fatigue” - the Apps were not originally created to be monetized. FB was created as a social media outlet for communication, not as a major advertising outlet or search portal. We are watching a FB evolution. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The fact of the matter is, Facebook is not user-service interaction, like how Google is, but it’s all user-user interaction with the service acting as a communication link. When a user lists his or her music or film preferences on Facebook, it is for the express purpose of communication those interests to his or her peers, not so random people on the Internet can look them up and say “Oh hey, I like State Farm, too!”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is a great article from 2 years addressing these very concerns at: &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.marketing-ninja.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.marketing-ninja.com&lt;/a&gt; August 12th, 2007&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was simply agreeing with Chris about the monetization of FB Apps being a significant wave of the future - big $$$. (Even so, don't you just get a little bit sick of seeing a large corporate symbol stuck on everything you do, see, or read? Just sayin...)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">onlinedesign</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:57:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Luci the lemon tree</title><link>http://luci.tumblr.com/post/96137044#comment-8270118</link><description>Use the floss! FLOSS!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">billso</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:28:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Seven Gates of Hell</title><link>http://czarism.com/the-seven-gates-of-hell#comment-7879956</link><description>aoorive</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">czar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 08:36:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bonuses</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/03/bonuses.html#comment-7316539</link><description>1) don't pay them peanuts. Pay them a good salary &amp; don't put a limit on when bonus stock can be sold.&lt;br&gt;2) agreed&lt;br&gt;3) but wouldn't that cash be better spent, building up the company? Most executives already write off most of their entertainment &amp; travel expenses anyhow. Plus if an executive is relying on a bonus, and the economy tanks or a competitor takes all your business, what's to keep the executive from jumping ship?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">needcaffeine</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:38:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can Amazon Run The Table On Cloud Services?</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/03/can-amazon-run-the-table-on-cloud-services.html#comment-7314777</link><description>yes, it is paranoid. Depends what you're building, MySpace &amp; Facebook are making money by adverts only, at least till recently. If you're going to be selling a service/product, and not just providing an open platform you want to insure limited if any outages. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;look at pownce, a great service (free &amp; paid)- it went offline for several days, and lost (what seemed like) 70% of it's user base. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My primary concern would be to insure you have daily backups of your data at your office location or some other provider service(not the same company providing the cloud). Look at Ma.gnolia, or Twitter, when they're mysql DBs corrupted &amp; they lost all their data &amp;/or site/service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">needcaffeine</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:29:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can Amazon Run The Table On Cloud Services?</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/03/can-amazon-run-the-table-on-cloud-services.html#comment-7314208</link><description>Clouds - no matter what you name it, it's just a bunch of VM servers clustered together w/ shared storage &amp; fat pipes between datacenters. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not wholly sure how Amazon locates a VM server that you create. Is it located close to your location, or where low latency is? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My concern is with overload at a particular location. Let's say multiple startups have their VMs located in LA, as well as some large media organizations &amp; Apple. So while at SXSWi or similar, there's a real buzz for 60% of these startups, Apple releases another fanboy object, &amp; OJ escapes jail. So now there's massive load of internet traffic &amp;  I/O traffic at this DC in LA.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well all the startups &amp; Apple have informed Amazon that there may be increased load....but no one expected the OJ thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Has Amazon or other sufficiently provided enough bandwidth &amp; I/O capabilities at that site to handle the load...or will VMs be moved to other DCs which could mean inaccessibility for some VMs during the transition and/or increased latency issues for the end user trying to find out about your product...if a customer gets any sort of error accessing your website; they're less likely to return.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">needcaffeine</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:03:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can Amazon Run The Table On Cloud Services?</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/03/can-amazon-run-the-table-on-cloud-services.html#comment-7294112</link><description>I'm just thinking about if there was some event, where a bunch of startups thought they'd get a lot more hits after such; I'd just be concerned if all the startups had their servers in a single cloud location.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">needcaffeine</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:17:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can Amazon Run The Table On Cloud Services?</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/03/can-amazon-run-the-table-on-cloud-services.html#comment-7286680</link><description>agreed for elasticity it is the best option...at the moment. Though I wonder if IBM or such will get into this business? The hope is that Amazon is over expanding their services to handle the needs. To handle a load, such as if multiple vendors wanted to 10x their capacity at a single cloud location; would Amazon be able to handle?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">needcaffeine</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:01:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hawaii&amp;#8217;s move to digital TV surprises some residents</title><link>http://billso.com/2009/01/15/dtv-surprises-hawaii/#comment-5363335</link><description>Thanks, Ryan. See my edits in my article.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">billso</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:33:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>