http://disqus.com/people/FaceySpacey/enFri, 26 Jun 2009 16:12:41 -0000http://mashable.disqus.com/now_about_those_new_online_music_business_models8230/#comment-11792227I agree, as all the 2.87 tools us techs enjoy become more and more mainstream, some sort of market will emerge. Either that or everyone will just make music and listen to music by their best friends more than music from Michael Jackson and Madonna.FaceySpaceyFri, 26 Jun 2009 16:12:41 -0000http://jamesgillmore.disqus.com/faceyspaceycom_my_second_blog_post_to_linux_88/#comment-11760567awesome!FaceySpaceyFri, 26 Jun 2009 01:54:08 -0000http://picktit.disqus.com/about/#comment-11602346Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.FaceySpaceyTue, 23 Jun 2009 01:39:52 -0000http://picktit.disqus.com/about/#comment-11602336Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.FaceySpaceyTue, 23 Jun 2009 01:39:45 -0000http://venturebeat.disqus.com/mob_wars_the_million_dollar_a_month_independent_facebook_app_may_legally_belong_to_sgn_05/#comment-11602307Why hasn't Maestri updated Mob Wars and made it able to compete with Mafia Wars and Mobsters?FaceySpaceyTue, 23 Jun 2009 01:39:28 -0000http://picktit.disqus.com/about/#comment-11601830comment testingFaceySpaceyTue, 23 Jun 2009 01:16:46 -0000http://clickequations.disqus.com/why_it8217s_called_first_page_bid_estimate/#comment-10723865From SMX Advanced in Seattle a similar question was posted and here is a quick summary to the answer given (by a Google employee).<br><br>If there is a category or search query that has almost no competitors than when you attempt to bid on this search query your ad may not show up either. The reason for this is relevance to the user and good user experience. For example, the search query "what year was world war I?" does not have any paid search ads, it doesn't because Google knows that this query is more researched based. To get a paid result on this query you would have to prove to Google that your paid search result could drive traffic and be relevant for users. <br><br>If there are close to zero competitors but still some, then it might be that these advertisers have historical data and high CTR's that have allowed them to be serving for a particular query.<br><br>In regards to your question, I don't really keep too close of track on bid in relation to FPBE, I'm more interested in FPBE and my position.rstockWed, 10 Jun 2009 20:21:14 -0000http://adaptiveblue.disqus.com/introducing_glue_api/#comment-10531102Can't wait to see what you're building :)FraserFri, 05 Jun 2009 15:36:20 -0000http://adaptiveblue.disqus.com/introducing_glue_api/#comment-10348990Seriously Sweet! Being able to ping a site's url to get xml of it's semantic meta data is serious.FaceySpaceyMon, 01 Jun 2009 08:53:45 -0000http://clickequations.disqus.com/why_it8217s_called_first_page_bid_estimate/#comment-8711662Google sets the minimum required bid for any keyword - and usually not at 0.01. They do this for keywords that have no paid ads, and for those with lots of competitors when they only show a small number of ads. They always set the minimum using a formula known only to them. So the answer it it varies depending on what Google wants to set the price at for that keyword.craigdanuloffSun, 26 Apr 2009 19:15:12 -0000http://clickequations.disqus.com/why_it8217s_called_first_page_bid_estimate/#comment-8691138much needed post. What do you think about a search term that never has any ads and has a 30 cent FPBE? Is it possible to bid .01 cent and get it? Maybe the estimate is 5 cents or something. My question is basically this: Does google force advertisers to bid a certain amount for keywords that have zero or close to zero competition. Maybe this is an extreme example, but I think anyone reading this knows what I'm saying. BASICALLY WHAT IS THE LOWEST BIDS PEOPLE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO REGULARLY ACHIEVE RELATIVE TO THE FPBE FOR THE KEYWORD TARGETED?FaceySpaceySat, 25 Apr 2009 17:27:48 -0000http://disqus.disqus.com/custom_css_for_iframe/#comment-8588717I will have an answer for you by tomorrow at the latest. <br><br>My sincere apologies,<br><br>Giannii<br>DISQUS<br>Community Manager<br><a href="mailto:help@disqus.com" rel="nofollow">help@disqus.com</a>gianniiWed, 22 Apr 2009 19:05:36 -0000http://disqus.disqus.com/custom_css_for_iframe/#comment-8587633Somebody needs to say it: IT'S FUCKING BULLSHIT THAT DISQUS IS NOT HANDLING THIS!!! They're far from on point as a social media company. You're supposed to be all out in the blogosphere answering questions and comments to people talking about your product, and THEY CAN'T EVEN MAINTAIN THEIR OWN FORUM. This is bullshit. I'll pay someone $100 to solve this for me.FaceySpaceyWed, 22 Apr 2009 18:29:51 -0000http://disqus.disqus.com/problems_getting_css_styling_to_work/#comment-8587495Giannii these threads need some responses from Disqus. You guys have a great offering and I'm shocked by the lack of support. Your forum isn't very big and NEEDS someone answering these threads to keep your developer evangelists happy. WE ARE NOT! ...Same problem here.FaceySpaceyWed, 22 Apr 2009 18:24:21 -0000http://jamesgillmore.disqus.com/faceyspaceycom_123_27/#comment-8415449Succesfful Video Comment Test!!!FaceySpaceyMon, 20 Apr 2009 05:16:32 -0000http://jamesgillmore.disqus.com/faceyspaceycom_123_27/#comment-8415427<a href="http://www.site.com" rel="nofollow">site link</a>FaceySpaceyMon, 20 Apr 2009 05:13:52 -0000http://jamesgillmore.disqus.com/faceyspaceycom_123_27/#comment-8415410check <a href="http://site.com" rel="nofollow">site.com</a> or check <a href="http://www.zite.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.zite.com</a> or check <a href="http://site.com" rel="nofollow">http://site.com</a>FaceySpaceyMon, 20 Apr 2009 05:11:41 -0000http://zlobo.disqus.com/test_01/#comment-8290123commentFaceySpaceyFri, 17 Apr 2009 04:38:28 -0000http://jamesgillmore.disqus.com/faceyspaceycom_123_27/#comment-8119369Hello again!!!sergeyjsMon, 13 Apr 2009 13:34:16 -0000http://jamesgillmore.disqus.com/faceyspaceycom_123_27/#comment-8117043SecondFaceySpaceyMon, 13 Apr 2009 11:57:42 -0000http://jamesgillmore.disqus.com/faceyspaceycom_123_27/#comment-8117030FirstFaceySpaceyMon, 13 Apr 2009 11:57:21 -0000http://jamesgillmore.disqus.com/faceyspaceycom_bug_701_test_84/#comment-8115974Первый Нах!!!FaceySpaceyMon, 13 Apr 2009 11:43:44 -0000http://jamesgillmore.disqus.com/faceyspaceycom_yo_ho_ho_19/#comment-8115522Stop it guys!!!FaceySpaceyMon, 13 Apr 2009 11:24:29 -0000http://jamesgillmore.disqus.com/faceyspaceycom_my_best_post_to_blog/#comment-80911723333333333333FaceySpaceySun, 12 Apr 2009 01:05:50 -0000http://jamesgillmore.disqus.com/faceyspaceycom_my_best_post_to_blog/#comment-80050242222446666666FaceySpaceyThu, 09 Apr 2009 10:11:00 -0000