<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for GabeRivera</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/GabeRivera/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:52:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: On Citizen Journalism, The Degradation Of Society, And Bitchmemes</title><link>http://parislemon.disqus.com/on_citizen_journalism_the_degradation_of_society_and_bitchmemes/#comment-22418631</link><description>group hug?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qthrul</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:52:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Citizen Journalism, The Degradation Of Society, And Bitchmemes</title><link>http://parislemon.disqus.com/on_citizen_journalism_the_degradation_of_society_and_bitchmemes/#comment-22418387</link><description>+1</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulcarr</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:43:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Citizen Journalism, The Degradation Of Society, And Bitchmemes</title><link>http://parislemon.disqus.com/on_citizen_journalism_the_degradation_of_society_and_bitchmemes/#comment-22411570</link><description>LOL</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:53:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who will be the Walter Cronkite of the blogosphere?</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/who_will_be_the_walter_cronkite_of_the_blogosphere/#comment-12937724</link><description>I nominate Dean Takahashi for Walter Cronkite of the Blogosphere.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:05:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New way to get on Techmeme: send tips to Techmeme via Twitter - Techmeme News</title><link>http://techmemenews.disqus.com/new_way_to_get_on_techmeme_send_tips_to_techmeme_via_twitter_techmeme_news/#comment-5647262</link><description>Yep, "#tip @techmeme" works.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:40:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New way to get on Techmeme: send tips to Techmeme via Twitter - Techmeme News</title><link>http://techmemenews.disqus.com/new_way_to_get_on_techmeme_send_tips_to_techmeme_via_twitter_techmeme_news/#comment-5647285</link><description>Why not @techmeme chicken?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:40:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New way to get on Techmeme: send tips to Techmeme via Twitter - Techmeme News</title><link>http://techmemenews.disqus.com/new_way_to_get_on_techmeme_send_tips_to_techmeme_via_twitter_techmeme_news/#comment-5647257</link><description>Not yet!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:37:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New way to get on Techmeme: send tips to Techmeme via Twitter - Techmeme News</title><link>http://techmemenews.disqus.com/new_way_to_get_on_techmeme_send_tips_to_techmeme_via_twitter_techmeme_news/#comment-5636094</link><description>Hmm, I think "#tip @techmeme" may already work.  I'll take a look.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:16:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Apple, FriendFeed, and TechMeme | Mark.</title><link>http://itafroma.disqus.com/on_apple_friendfeed_and_techmeme_mark/#comment-4923719</link><description>Thanks, Gabe. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On FriendFeed, there's a discussion going on about this post, particularly on the lack of depth on your comments: like you've said, it's not like this is a new position for you. Mentioning TechMeme and its possible problems acts as an easy diversion from actually discussing the points you've made recently and historically.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Itafroma</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Apple, FriendFeed, and TechMeme | Mark.</title><link>http://itafroma.disqus.com/on_apple_friendfeed_and_techmeme_mark/#comment-4923515</link><description>Hey, good points.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, I just don't know why people thought I was somehow talking about Techmeme when I mentioned FriendFeed (which was at Scoble's prompting BTW).  I'll add that my thoughts on FriendFeed's relationship to Techmeme haven't changed much since March '08: &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/cP9v" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://bit.ly/cP9v&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as Techmeme sucking, I like Techmeme, but it's not for 99.9% of the world, so for those 99.9% it will probably suck!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:34:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Overnight success takes a long time</title><link>http://paulbuchheit.disqus.com/overnight_success_takes_a_long_time/#comment-4891252</link><description>Now THAT is interesting! What is the right kind of behavior? I think you're onto something there, but want to hear a lot more of what you consider the "right" kind of behavior.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:49:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Overnight success takes a long time</title><link>http://paulbuchheit.disqus.com/overnight_success_takes_a_long_time/#comment-4887637</link><description>Nobody should count out FF. The obvious technical excellence of the team and the very impressive pace of innovation you guys have already demonstrated make that clear.  But I think people are alarmed that so many people have tried the site and then abandoned it (or at least that's how it appears).  I personally think the way commenting and liking works has created incentives for the wrong kind of behavior, and you might be stuck in a kind of local maximum as far as uptake until you really shake things up. But what do I know? Anyway, good luck, I'll use FF regardless (though I don't comment any more...).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:55:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 objectively biggest tech stories of 2008 - Techmeme News</title><link>http://techmemenews.disqus.com/top_10_objectively_biggest_tech_stories_of_2008_techmeme_news/#comment-4793467</link><description>Six Techmeme search results for "iFart": &lt;a href="http://www.techmeme.com/search/query?q=ifart" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.techmeme.com/search/query?q=ifart&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:44:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 objectively biggest tech stories of 2008 - Techmeme News</title><link>http://techmemenews.disqus.com/top_10_objectively_biggest_tech_stories_of_2008_techmeme_news/#comment-4793449</link><description>John, it's OK to mention your own stuff here, but you need to link to their corresponding Techmeme permalinks so that we know those are the good &lt;a href="http://furrier.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;furrier.org&lt;/a&gt; posts. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:43:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 objectively biggest tech stories of 2008 - Techmeme News</title><link>http://techmemenews.disqus.com/top_10_objectively_biggest_tech_stories_of_2008_techmeme_news/#comment-4793453</link><description>That was #11.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:41:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guess what? Automated news doesn't quite work. - Techmeme News</title><link>http://techmemenews.disqus.com/guess_what_automated_news_doesnt_quite_work_techmeme_news/#comment-4163666</link><description>Nope, we tried PERSONAL finance.  That's different!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:07:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guess what? Automated news doesn't quite work. - Techmeme News</title><link>http://techmemenews.disqus.com/guess_what_automated_news_doesnt_quite_work_techmeme_news/#comment-4162959</link><description>Three years?!? You said that three years ago! :P</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:26:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guess what? Automated news doesn't quite work. - Techmeme News</title><link>http://techmemenews.disqus.com/guess_what_automated_news_doesnt_quite_work_techmeme_news/#comment-4161879</link><description>You know what they say... the best compliment is addiction.&lt;br&gt;:)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">qthrul</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:24:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guess what? Automated news doesn't quite work. - Techmeme News</title><link>http://techmemenews.disqus.com/guess_what_automated_news_doesnt_quite_work_techmeme_news/#comment-4161613</link><description>Exactly!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:01:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guess what? Automated news doesn't quite work. - Techmeme News</title><link>http://techmemenews.disqus.com/guess_what_automated_news_doesnt_quite_work_techmeme_news/#comment-4161610</link><description>Thanks.  Interesting.  Though wrong may be right for you, I believe wrong is usually wrong for more people.  Right? :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:01:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guess what? Automated news doesn't quite work. - Techmeme News</title><link>http://techmemenews.disqus.com/guess_what_automated_news_doesnt_quite_work_techmeme_news/#comment-4161545</link><description>Hah. Who's the zebra now?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:55:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guess what? Automated news doesn't quite work. - Techmeme News</title><link>http://techmemenews.disqus.com/guess_what_automated_news_doesnt_quite_work_techmeme_news/#comment-4161542</link><description>Exactly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:55:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guess what? Automated news doesn't quite work. - Techmeme News</title><link>http://techmemenews.disqus.com/guess_what_automated_news_doesnt_quite_work_techmeme_news/#comment-4161537</link><description>That seems to be a theme in this thread!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:54:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guess what? Automated news doesn't quite work. - Techmeme News</title><link>http://techmemenews.disqus.com/guess_what_automated_news_doesnt_quite_work_techmeme_news/#comment-4161533</link><description>The interface is kinda cool. Low tech in some ways. High tech in others.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whitelabel? Ask me in 3 years!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GabeRivera</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:54:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guess what? Automated news doesn't quite work. - Techmeme News</title><link>http://techmemenews.disqus.com/guess_what_automated_news_doesnt_quite_work_techmeme_news/#comment-4159157</link><description>More like a microblogger. I run a small consulting business. I am excited to see what stories are featured in the future. Good luck.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markbean</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:57:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>