<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for JayCruz</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/JayCruz/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:47:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Blogs to tell you things you don&amp;#8217;t know</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/blogs_to_tell_you_things_you_don8217t_know/#comment-16002537</link><description>Cool, I must check that out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:47:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogs to tell you things you don&amp;#8217;t know</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/blogs_to_tell_you_things_you_don8217t_know/#comment-15996508</link><description>Thanks for including TND in this really cool list. As in blogs I would recommend there are too many, but one I've fallen in love with is Snarkmarket &lt;a href="http://snarkmarket.com/blog/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://snarkmarket.com/blog/&lt;/a&gt; and I recommend it because is not as well known as it should.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:05:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Daily Death: When A Celebrity Dies Every 15 Minutes</title><link>http://tomorrowmuseum.disqus.com/the_daily_death_when_a_celebrity_dies_every_15_minutes/#comment-15055596</link><description>Good point. We also mythologize celebrities. They are our greek gods</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jomc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:10:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Daily Death: When A Celebrity Dies Every 15 Minutes</title><link>http://tomorrowmuseum.disqus.com/the_daily_death_when_a_celebrity_dies_every_15_minutes/#comment-15029030</link><description>We mythologize the dead because they can never deny or confirm our presumptions about them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:45:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why one guy is quitting social media and why this is important</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/why_one_guy_is_quitting_social_media_and_why_this_is_important/#comment-10584793</link><description>No worries, thanks for stopping by.  Glad to hear the blogging continues!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 05:17:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why one guy is quitting social media and why this is important</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/why_one_guy_is_quitting_social_media_and_why_this_is_important/#comment-10576395</link><description>Thanks for sharing the post around and for offering a really great reaction. I was kind of scared that it was going to turn out too lecture-y. :) I don't think is something that drastic though. That's another assumption about social media that's overblown. The idea that if you're not on Twitter, Facebook, Friendfeed, you're missing out. I guess the speed, but I find that to be more of a disadvantage. I'm slowing it down like Dr Dre with Dr Pepper. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm definitely not planning on quitting the blog however. This can sound hypocritical because blogs are thrown into the social media tag, but the expectation and purpose is clear. I write, you read. Maybe I get comment, maybe I comment back. :) But I'm definitely out of the following-being-followed thing. And hey, I can always make a blog post of what I had for breakfast.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks again Mark. I always appreciate your thoughts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:45:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is the real-time Web all that it is cracked up to be?</title><link>http://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/is_the_real_time_web_all_that_it_is_cracked_up_to_be/#comment-9807152</link><description>I agree with you on that Jay</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StevenHodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:39:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is the real-time Web all that it is cracked up to be?</title><link>http://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/is_the_real_time_web_all_that_it_is_cracked_up_to_be/#comment-9803356</link><description>The problem with the "real time web" and "social media" for that matter, is the premise of it's selling point: That everything that happens is news, that sharing anything is dubbed content, and the unrealistic expectation of socializing without triviality, banality, or noise.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:00:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: jayCruz - Daniel
 Bat for Lashes Daniel to scenes of The...</title><link>http://tapenoisediary.disqus.com/jaycruz_daniel_bat_for_lashes_daniel_to_scenes_of_the/#comment-9481716</link><description>The song is the regular version from the Two Suns album... I think. Now you got me confused. The video was downloaded from a Karate Kid tribute from Youtube. I just cut and edited some scenes with iMovie. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 19:47:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Tumblarity; My Tumblr Feature Requests</title><link>http://azspot.disqus.com/on_tumblarity_my_tumblr_feature_requests/#comment-9133614</link><description>I don't know why people think that Tumblr, and the web for that matter, has been a non-competitive utopic community of intimate friends. Not that you can't have that experience in a semi-public kind of way, but if you don't really care about popularity, then it shouldn't matter. If you truly want an "intimate" experience then have it. Stay in Facebook and add only the real real friends. Use your email, chats, and stuff that is truly more private and intimate. Make your Tumblr private.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, I understand the concern. There's been this shift in the web with the whole web 2.0 ideal of participatory audience. The Social Media thing which is Web 2.0 gone haywire. People are giving themselves an unnecessary pressure to be "useful" and donate "valuable" content and I'm not sure if that has made the web better at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the end Tumblr is what you make of it. You can look at the stats, see what you can do about that and if it matters, or you can just ignore it and keep posting photos of your breakfast.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 13:24:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Gospel According to Gillmor</title><link>http://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/the_gospel_according_to_gillmor/#comment-9083293</link><description>Since a lot of sites and blogs have created Twitter feeds, it can replace the rss reader if that's all you do. But I thought that Twitter was about following people, so I find that kind of odd.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:30:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: jayCruz</title><link>http://tapenoisediary.disqus.com/jaycruz_830/#comment-8711654</link><description>This actor is on my to pay attention radar from now on.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:14:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter and Posterous</title><link>http://mattmaroon.disqus.com/twitter_and_posterous/#comment-8489684</link><description>You just explained exactly how I feel about Twitter, but articulated it way much better than I ever could. There's this idea being sold about the "importance" of Twitter and how it's going to change the future of media that's just ridiculous.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:03:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why do we participate in group projects? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/why_do_we_participate_in_group_projects_broadcasting_brain/#comment-7377690</link><description>EGOBOO - now there's a term I haven't thought of in years!  And it fits!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:01:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why do we participate in group projects? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/why_do_we_participate_in_group_projects_broadcasting_brain/#comment-7377030</link><description>There's "Egoboo" &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egoboo" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egoboo&lt;/a&gt; but that's just another form of intrinsic motivation. I think the four things that you mention are about it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:34:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The blogroll still lives but we are killing it off | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/the_blogroll_still_lives_but_we_are_killing_it_off_broadcasting_brain/#comment-7289277</link><description>I'm going to try to be more conscious of blogrolls for the next little while - it's unfortunate that sometimes they fall into that gray area of perception that we tend to block out (e.g. ads)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:46:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The blogroll still lives but we are killing it off | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/the_blogroll_still_lives_but_we_are_killing_it_off_broadcasting_brain/#comment-7288330</link><description>It's definitely lost its power for the reasons you mention like linking to Twitter and sharing feeds. Another reason why it has lost it's power is because of the buddy-blogger-link exchange-thing. Readers learned to ignore that part of the sidebar because it got too cumbersome. I still like the idea though, but that's because I'm kind of "old school". :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:10:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bibliotherapy?</title><link>http://52books.disqus.com/bibliotherapy/#comment-6393306</link><description>It's the first time I hear about Bibliotherapy too. I think it makes sense that books can be used as therapy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:53:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: jayCruz</title><link>http://tapenoisediary.disqus.com/jaycruz_11/#comment-5106059</link><description>If Im not mistaken, I think Gladwell also talks about Godin in his book The Tipping Point, but I'm not 100% sure. He's definitely one of the great thinkers and communicators out there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:10:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 mistakes from 2008 that I hope I learn from | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/10_mistakes_from_2008_that_i_hope_i_learn_from_broadcasting_brain/#comment-4790066</link><description>I'm sure that would work fine for you, Jay, so that's good.  I don't want to write "picture perfect" posts, but I do want them to have solid ideas behind them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:12:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 mistakes from 2008 that I hope I learn from | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/10_mistakes_from_2008_that_i_hope_i_learn_from_broadcasting_brain/#comment-4787983</link><description>I'm taking you're #9 goal, but in reverse. I want to be less "afraid" to publish because of quality. It's really hard to reach a balance with that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:25:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: sigh, Twitter.</title><link>http://peterwknox.disqus.com/sigh_twitter/#comment-4417000</link><description>I  usually use Twitter search using keywords, check out profiles, read a couple tweets, and then decide to follow. There are some tools to check out "featured" users, &lt;a href="http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/9-useful-sites-for-finding-people-to-follow-on-twitter/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/9-useful-sites-for...&lt;/a&gt; the link has couple of tools, but you have dig a little deeper.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:29:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do link blogs suck? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/do_link_blogs_suck_broadcasting_brain/#comment-4234265</link><description>Context adds value and it is much preferred to a static list of links.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 06:28:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do link blogs suck? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/do_link_blogs_suck_broadcasting_brain/#comment-4229897</link><description>If you mean using a platform like wordpress or blogger to just putting hypertext, then yes, I agree. If your going to do just that, then something like twitter, digg, or delicious would be a better option. But you could be a good "link blogger", as in pointing to things you find online, if you offer some context.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:46:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is creative content going to atomize even further? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/is_creative_content_going_to_atomize_even_further_broadcasting_brain/#comment-3983413</link><description>Music wise, I think that's the trend that you will keep on seeing. I don't know how good or bad it is, but the web has influenced different media to be more immersive. More participatory. If I'm not mistaken, Beck released some singles for people to mix and then he put the best mix on the album. That's the good part I guess. The bad part is that attention spans are getting shorter and shorter.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:35:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>