<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Jaykul</title><link>https://disqus.com/by/Jaykul/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://disqus.com/Jaykul/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2023 22:54:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Chocolatey Software | sops 3.6.1</title><link>https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/sops#comment-6291504393</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Did you see this moved, and there's a new release?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://github.com/getsops/sops/releases/tag/v3.8.0" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://github.com/getsops/sops/releases/tag/v3.8.0"&gt;https://github.com/getsops/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2023 22:54:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolatey Software | age.beta (Portable) 1.0.0-beta7</title><link>https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/age.portable#comment-6291503694</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is there no 1.1.1?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2023 22:52:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolatey Software | kubelogin (Azure) 0.0.20</title><link>https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/azure-kubelogin#comment-6286116895</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Falling behind again there are 3 newer releases&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 17:51:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolatey Gallery | Miniconda (Python 3) 3.9.1</title><link>https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/miniconda3#comment-6258759672</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is this abandoned? Can we get a release for 5.2?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2023 16:35:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolatey Gallery | powershell-core (Install) 6.0.0-alpha18</title><link>https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/powershell-core#comment-6233002474</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With chocolatey 2.0 out, we can't use side-by-side installs anymore, so there doesn't seem to be any way to have the current (supported) release and also the preview release installed. Any thoughts on how to fix that?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2023 20:36:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolatey Software | Ubuntu 22.04 LTS for WSL 22.4.0.20220620</title><link>https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/wsl-ubuntu-2204#comment-6078932863</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Broken&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2022 21:54:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolatey Software | kubelogin (Azure) 0.0.20</title><link>https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/azure-kubelogin#comment-6071792465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can we get an update? This is on 0.25&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:28:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolatey Software | lively 1.1.8.0</title><link>https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/lively#comment-5912041164</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, needs to be installing "dotnet" because that desktop package only goes to 3.1 and this requires 6.x&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2022 14:45:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolatey Software | open-policy-agent 0.26.0</title><link>https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/open-policy-agent#comment-5855731362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is super out of date&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 18:38:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolatey Gallery | powershell-core (Install) 6.0.0-alpha18</title><link>https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/powershell-core#comment-5581956667</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@DarwinJS I don't know why the 7.1.5 isn't showing up, but the 7.2.0-preview10 is getting downgraded because in SemVer 1.0 the "pre release" segment is just treated alphabetically, so "preview10" comes &lt;i&gt;before&lt;/i&gt; "preview2" ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the future, when you convert SemVer2.0 style versions (i.e. with a dot in the prerelease like PowerShell's "-preview.2") to remove the dot, you need to zero-pad the number, in case you get to ten (probably don't need to worry about 100, at least with PowerShell).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other words, it should have been 7.2.0-preview01 through -preview09 so that when you got to 10 it would show up right alphabetically.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, if you release the release candidate, "r" comes after "p" so we can all just forget about -preview10 😉&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2021 18:12:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolatey Gallery | ArsClip 5.09</title><link>https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/arsclip#comment-5581945944</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, I see what you did wrong. Sent you a PR. I'm having weird issues with the HTTPS site though, I'm getting 302 *errors* -- you might want to double-check me ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2021 18:00:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolatey Gallery | powershell-core (Install) 6.0.0-alpha18</title><link>https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/powershell-core#comment-5581881106</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, can you release the 7.2 release candidate? Hopefully with zero padding this time, just in case they get to 10 again 😉  -rc01&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2021 16:52:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolatey Gallery | ArsClip 5.09</title><link>https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/arsclip#comment-5515406332</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can we get a 5.33?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2021 13:34:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolatey Gallery | Visual Studio Code Docker Extension 1.0.0</title><link>https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/vscode-docker#comment-4561079523</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What do you think about replacing:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt;code --install-extension PeterJausovec.vscode-docker&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With a version that will work on either (and both) code and code-insiders?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt;if (Get-Command code) {&lt;br&gt;        code --install-extension PeterJausovec.vscode-docker&lt;br&gt;}&lt;br&gt;if (Get-Command code-insiders) {&lt;br&gt;     code-insiders --install-extension PeterJausovec.vscode-docker&lt;br&gt;}&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:07:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolatey Gallery | ArsClip 5.09</title><link>https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/arsclip#comment-4561039086</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is now broken, as far as I can tell. Needs a new maintainer and an update or 20&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:34:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Powershell and Single vs Double Quotes</title><link>http://jon.netdork.net/2015/09/08/powershell-and-single-vs-double-quotes/#comment-4101136230</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How would double-quotes break the command?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;get-aduser  -filter "name -like `"*$fullname*`""&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 21:54:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Introducing Azure DevOps</title><link>https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/introducing-azure-devops/#comment-4088394152</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Except that the video literally says "Azure DevOps has everything you need to turn an idea into a working piece of software" -- as if they've completely forgotten that you're probably going to need a team of people, too...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:36:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Octopus Cloud - Octopus Deploy</title><link>https://octopus.com/blog/announcing-octopus-cloud#comment-3970809964</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I feel like you guys have lost your way with this. You have a cloud offering, but it's designed purely for new customers, without import functionality... &amp;lt;passiveagressivevoice&amp;gt;I guess that makes sense, since it certainly isn't anywhere near the top of the list of things your existing &lt;br&gt;customers have been asking for.&amp;lt;/passiveagressivevoice&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From my point of view, to be able to use a cloud hosted Octopus, we *require* the ability to create a deployment from code in source control. Whether that's a script, a yaml file, or your Octopus.Migrator json files... In fact, that is the #3 thing on your user voice! Unfortunately, it's completely dropped off the radar since [the RFC, over a year ago](&lt;a href="https://octopus.com/blog/rfc-version-control)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://octopus.com/blog/rfc-version-control)"&gt;https://octopus.com/blog/rf...&lt;/a&gt; while you've had your heads in the clouds, so to speak.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, Microsoft's TFS/VSTS team says they'll have YAML support for releases later this year...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 13:21:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A PowerShell Tool Scorecard</title><link>http://wragg.io/the-powershell-tool-scorecard/#comment-3714206132</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like it. Although I'm struggling with giving out 80% of the points in the "bonus" round. I think that pointing system emphasizes the wrong things. The idea that automatically publishing to the PowerShell Gallery from CI is worth a cumulative 20 points (because it includes points for having CI and for publishing) while correct-code questions are only worth one point each doesn't make sense to me....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think on Penalty 5, I would make it broader:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Are you ignoring the preference variables and common parameters? E.g. by setting $ErrorActionPreference to a hard-coded value inside your function.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've run into at least as much code that incorrectly sets $ErrorActionPreference= "Stop" and ignores my -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue as the other way 'round.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the realm of the personal preference, I would soften the aliases statement. Choosing full names over aliases is about readability and about compatibility with PowerShell Core -- where the so-called built-in aliases have been drastically trimmed. But in general, if you have or create an alias that's clearer and more readable than the full name, there's nothing wrong with using that (for example, Azure's Login-AzAccount vs. Add-AzureRmAccount or the built in "Where" vs Where-Object, or even the universally known "dir" vs Get-ChildItem), but you need to define the alias at the top of your code to make 100% sure it's clear, and will work cross-platform.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:45:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolatey Software | Microsoft .NET Core 3.1.13</title><link>https://community.chocolatey.org/packages/dotnetcore#comment-3415925486</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Shouldn't there be a 2.0.0-Preview2 available?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 01:13:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RFC: Version Control of Octopus configuration with Octopus Declarative</title><link>https://localhost:44301/blog/version-control#comment-3215670372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't really understand the combination of "declarative" and "C#" -- how is it that when you started thinking about declarative solutions, you thought of using C# classes as the way to declare them?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wouldn't it be better to use extensible declarative frameworks like PowerShell DSC or Terraform or Chef? Or perhaps the languages administrators are used to using for static configuration, like json or XML? You already have some of the pieces of doing that using json in your octopus.migrator tool ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:17:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RFC: Version Control of Octopus configuration with Octopus Declarative</title><link>https://localhost:44301/blog/version-control#comment-3215601523</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I had the same thought about a PowerShell DSC provider&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:39:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Powershell and Single vs Double Quotes</title><link>http://jon.netdork.net/2015/09/08/powershell-and-single-vs-double-quotes/#comment-2785406613</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I think the problem is that there's not enough work. When you're timing something that takes nanoseconds, then even your timing logic takes as long as the thing you're measuring, which means that anything *else* that's going on in your computer basically randomizes the results ;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's obviously not anything worth worrying about, regardless.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:54:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Powershell and Single vs Double Quotes</title><link>http://jon.netdork.net/2015/09/08/powershell-and-single-vs-double-quotes/#comment-2783338302</link><description>&lt;p&gt;On my Windows 10 RTM box, right now, your exact test would come out like this:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;single: 00:00:00.0527651 &lt;br&gt;double: 00:00:00.0477172&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What PowerShell version are you on?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:17:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Powershell and Single vs Double Quotes</title><link>http://jon.netdork.net/2015/09/08/powershell-and-single-vs-double-quotes/#comment-2783237913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your performance test results are *the opposite* of every test I've ever run. I suggest you look at the cmdlet you're using as the cause, rather than the quotes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joel "Jaykul" Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:23:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>