<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for KyleSellers</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/KyleSellers/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:56:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Contest &amp;ndash; Win a Copy of Windows 7 Ultimate, Signature Edition</title><link>http://mobilitysite.disqus.com/contest_ndash_win_a_copy_of_windows_7_ultimate_signature_edition/#comment-20940057</link><description>Just finished the videos and followed!  BTW, I really dig the site!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KyleSellers</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:56:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Celebrity Hotlist: August 2009</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/twitter_celebrity_hotlist_august_2009/#comment-20636263</link><description>Added...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briansolis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:00:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Celebrity Hotlist: August 2009</title><link>http://briansolis2.disqus.com/twitter_celebrity_hotlist_august_2009/#comment-20635752</link><description>This list should really include Tila Tequila (@officialTila).  She is easily one of the most outspoken, and quite frankly most irritating, voices on Twitter.  From her suicidal breakdown to her weird conspiracy beliefs (aliens live inside people's brains?), she has regularly been a disruptive voice on Twitter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, the fact that she regularly gets her "army" to force topics of her choice into the Trending Topics also establishes her as a Twitter celebrity.  Lover her or hate her, she needs to be included on any list of this sort.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KyleSellers</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:50:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TWITTER TAKEOVER: Twitter Overwhelms Facebook Feeds</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/twitter_takeover_twitter_overwhelms_facebook_feeds/#comment-13646957</link><description>Official apps set to NOT auto update, both simultaneously begin updating--oh, and these two apps both happen to be competitors of Facebook in this space.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it is completely reasonable to link any more of my services to Facebook, whether this was accidental or not.  If I wanted all of that posted to Facebook, I would have posted it to Facebook in the first place. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have a hard time believing this was just a mistake.  If so, why did it affect both Twitter and Friendfeed, but none of the other services that can update your status remotely?  Just the two big ones?  Hmmm...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KyleSellers</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:24:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TWITTER TAKEOVER: Twitter Overwhelms Facebook Feeds</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/twitter_takeover_twitter_overwhelms_facebook_feeds/#comment-13618656</link><description>That's a dumb attitude. "Well, this pirated copy of Photoshop had a trojan in it. I'm not going to install any software on my computer anymore..."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">redwall_hp</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:27:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TWITTER TAKEOVER: Twitter Overwhelms Facebook Feeds</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/twitter_takeover_twitter_overwhelms_facebook_feeds/#comment-13611302</link><description>I did too, but it continued to post my tweets.  I had to remove the apps entirely.  I won't be adding any more Facebook apps, thank you very much!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KyleSellers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:52:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TWITTER TAKEOVER: Twitter Overwhelms Facebook Feeds</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/twitter_takeover_twitter_overwhelms_facebook_feeds/#comment-13611251</link><description>This is crap.  It started 1 hour 27 minutes ago for me.  I specifically keep my accounts separate so I don't overwhelm my family with my political rantings.  I have never been so furious with a web service before.  I understand a service failing, but this seems both sinister and dishonest.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KyleSellers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:51:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dennis Prager Has 10 questions. I have 10 answers.</title><link>http://ushealthcrisis.disqus.com/dennis_prager_has_10_questions_i_have_10_answers/#comment-13582110</link><description>On that basis we'd continue to exclude anyone with pre-existing  &lt;br&gt;conditions.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karoli</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:57:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dennis Prager Has 10 questions. I have 10 answers.</title><link>http://ushealthcrisis.disqus.com/dennis_prager_has_10_questions_i_have_10_answers/#comment-13580420</link><description>I am fully aware that the cost of doing nothing is high.  This has been framed as doing THIS plan versus doing nothing, which is a false dichotomy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think, though, that we should be finding the aspects of this plan with the most certain benefit/cost ratio and implement those.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KyleSellers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:01:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dennis Prager Has 10 questions. I have 10 answers.</title><link>http://ushealthcrisis.disqus.com/dennis_prager_has_10_questions_i_have_10_answers/#comment-13580274</link><description>Kyle, my aim here was to state fact. Fact 1: Obama has said it must be  &lt;br&gt;deficit-neutral. Fact 2:One trillion is an investment amortized over  &lt;br&gt;10 years, and includes the seed money to fund the public option as  &lt;br&gt;well as appropriations for other oversight areas of the bill. Again,  &lt;br&gt;amortized over 10 years and offset by tax increases (which I believe  &lt;br&gt;are unlikely...I think it will be something else), savings, withdrawal  &lt;br&gt;of Medicare Advantage subsidy, etc. We could withdraw the subsidy for  &lt;br&gt;Medicare Advantage, I suppose, and do nothing more. Of course, the  &lt;br&gt;costs would be substantially higher. Have you considered the  &lt;br&gt;ramifications of doing nothing and what that would do to the deficit?  &lt;br&gt;I'd be curious to see those numbers, particularly the swelling  &lt;br&gt;Medicaid rolls as the ARRA subsidy ends and those people roll off  &lt;br&gt;their COBRA coverage due to their inability to continue the premiums...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karoli</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:56:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dennis Prager Has 10 questions. I have 10 answers.</title><link>http://ushealthcrisis.disqus.com/dennis_prager_has_10_questions_i_have_10_answers/#comment-13579982</link><description>You point out that Obama has said he won't sign any bill that is not deficit neutral and argue that no one is proposing spending a trillion dollars.  That is simply not true.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unless we aren't paying for this until the savings have been reached, that money is coming from somewhere, and I doubt health care providers are going to just defer billing for half a decade at best.  So, a trillion dollars will either be pulled out of the private sector somehow or this money will be printed.  If it is printed, that devalues the dollar even further, in a time of economic weakness.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then, we might make up for that trillion dollars in savings.  Obama speaks about it with certainty, but few others do.  Many may hope that this is the case, but it is far from a certainty.  Plus, we need to consider the economic impact of reallocating this money in the meantime, the inflation that followed, the loss of employment that happens in between taxes being raised and the alleged savings occurring.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your response is a talking point.  I know you believe it, but there are very real and significant economic implications, that frankly no one can say one way or the other what will happen.  You might as well roll the dice, because any economist who says how the implementation of this plan would play out is just wrong.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, this may not mean it is unviable as a plan.  But when someone ignores very real concerns and dismisses them as GOP lies, I am concerned.  I would rather see contingency plans for what will happen if things don't go smoothly.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, President Obama saying that he won't do something should not fill you with confidence.  He has a history of backing away from promises once they have served his purpose.  His handling of the stimulus plan was abysmal, and he has earned every ounce of skepticism that he is experiencing from the American public.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KyleSellers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:47:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RIP, Michael Jackson and Farrah Fawcett</title><link>http://drumsnwhistles.disqus.com/rip_michael_jackson_and_farrah_fawcett/#comment-11766563</link><description>That man was unmatched at what he did.  His influence is one of the few that will last many decades, possibly centuries, after he is gone.  While not a fan of Michael Jackson the man, Michael Jackson the artist was a legend to me.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just wish he'd been able to pull his life together years ago... I can't help but feel that as amazing as he was, he still had more to offer but never had the chance.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KyleSellers</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:37:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nancy Grace Boots Guest After He Calls Her Show &amp;quot;A Joke&amp;quot; - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/nancy_grace_boots_guest_after_he_calls_her_show_quota_jokequot_mediabistrocom_tvnewser/#comment-9607866</link><description>Yes, but if you read my comment, I specified "news" station. ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KyleSellers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 20:45:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nancy Grace Boots Guest After He Calls Her Show &amp;quot;A Joke&amp;quot; - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/nancy_grace_boots_guest_after_he_calls_her_show_quota_jokequot_mediabistrocom_tvnewser/#comment-9603696</link><description>Ever heard of MSNBC? ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">THE_Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:07:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nancy Grace Boots Guest After He Calls Her Show &amp;quot;A Joke&amp;quot; - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/nancy_grace_boots_guest_after_he_calls_her_show_quota_jokequot_mediabistrocom_tvnewser/#comment-9601159</link><description>I think that is the first clip of Nancy Grace that I've actually ever smiled at while watching.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She has to be careful, I don't think there is a lower tier news station for her to get kicked down to after HLN...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KyleSellers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:58:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Episode 3 - REVIEW: Newhal Coffee Company's Newhall&amp;nbsp;Blend -  The Show - CoffeeFilterTV.com</title><link>http://coffeefiltertv.disqus.com/episode_3_review_newhal_coffee_companys_newhallnbspblend_the_show_coffeefiltertvcom/#comment-8969249</link><description>Fixed!  Thanks, JB.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KyleSellers</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 23:59:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pandemic Flu Prevention: For want of a horseshoe nail the economy was lost?</title><link>http://ushealthcrisis.disqus.com/pandemic_flu_prevention_for_want_of_a_horseshoe_nail_the_economy_was_lost/#comment-8788685</link><description>Kyle, you missed my point. Indeed, the reason for the inclusion of the final payment for the pandemic preparations was specifically because a pandemic could harm an already-rocky, fragile economy. And if this becomes a pandemic, it *will* harm it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The point is that arguing that the funding is not stimulative is absolute nonsense. As my USAF ex-father-in-law used to say (may God rest his soul) "Prior planning prevents piss-poor performance."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karoli</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:37:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pandemic Flu Prevention: For want of a horseshoe nail the economy was lost?</title><link>http://ushealthcrisis.disqus.com/pandemic_flu_prevention_for_want_of_a_horseshoe_nail_the_economy_was_lost/#comment-8763052</link><description>Please, please, please, don't get caught up in this too, @karoli!  The plan was funded in the omnibus appropriations spending bill signed by Obama.  &lt;a href="http://www.sunjournal.com/story/314585-3/National/Collins_defends_move_to_eliminate_flu_funds_from_stimulus/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sunjournal.com/story/314585-3/Nation...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The plan was funded--it just wasn't in anyway "stimulative" and Collins rightfully argued that it didn't belong in the "stimulus" bill!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KyleSellers</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:43:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Ways to Get Your Questions Answered on Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/5_ways_to_get_your_questions_answered_on_twitter/#comment-8488828</link><description>I have found Mahalo Answers to be the most responsive.  They are even going out and finding questions on Twitter and then putting up $1 "tips" to people who answer them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think that the absence of @answers on this list is unforgivable!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KyleSellers</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:35:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Starbucks, I&amp;#8217;m breaking up with you</title><link>http://drumsnwhistles.disqus.com/starbucks_i8217m_breaking_up_with_you/#comment-8361957</link><description>Kyle, I remember when I thought Starbucks was the be-all and end-all of coffee. That was in the days where 7-11 coffee was the norm. And I, too, have nothing against Starbucks. Their employee benefit offerings for part-time workers are outstanding when compared to other corporations. But I can't bear the idea of a world where everything is a chain, and there's no room for a local small biz to succeed. We've been slowly moving toward local everything, and the coffee is probably the last. Luckily we have amazing produce grown here, so that's been an easy shift. I found a bookstore right around the corner, so go there first when looking for books. But you're right -- these shops have amazing coffees. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I especially love having the choice of different coffees. That's really a treat.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karoli</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:20:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Starbucks, I&amp;#8217;m breaking up with you</title><link>http://drumsnwhistles.disqus.com/starbucks_i8217m_breaking_up_with_you/#comment-8361082</link><description>Thanks for the shout out, Karoli!  I have only been to elementcoffee twice, but had a fantastic experience both times.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I full heartedly agree with you about supporting smaller coffeeshops, and just as importantly, small specialty roasters.  I am not anti-Starbucks or mega-coffeechain, they usually have good coffee.  But they don't have the best coffee, and never will while there are artisan roasters who pour their lives into their coffees.  And most of the coffees at large chains are what I like to call "safe."  Or, if I'm in a bad mood, I call "just coffee."  They don't do anything special or exciting, like a good blend from Stumptown, Coffee Klatch, Intelligentsia, or many others.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KyleSellers</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:34:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Official Blog of Kyle Sellers - kylesellers.com  - First&amp;nbsp;Post!</title><link>http://kylesellers.disqus.com/the_official_blog_of_kyle_sellers_kylesellerscom_firstnbsppost/#comment-7980900</link><description>This is a test of the Disqus comments.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KyleSellers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:03:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: it gazes back at you</title><link>http://drumsnwhistles.disqus.com/it_gazes_back_at_you/#comment-7619816</link><description>I was actually about ten feet away.  The curve in the gazing ball  &lt;br&gt;makes it look much, much longer</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karoli</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:07:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: it gazes back at you</title><link>http://drumsnwhistles.disqus.com/it_gazes_back_at_you/#comment-7598215</link><description>Wow!  You took that shot from a ways away, huh?  That's a really great pic!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KyleSellers</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:28:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ask the President Your Question at a Press Conference</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/ask_the_president_your_question_at_a_press_conference/#comment-7377479</link><description>I think that if we want to avoid "spin" in politics, politicians should not be able to prepare for the questions.  I like this idea conceptually for "seeing what's on people's minds," but I wouldn't be able to take any press conference seriously where the person being questioned had been known in advance.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KyleSellers</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:51:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>