<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for MarkDykeman</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/MarkDykeman/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:47:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Uncategorized &amp;#8211; the post unleashed</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/uncategorized_8211_the_post_unleashed/#comment-21975340</link><description>Twitter is very good at doing a simple thing; Facebook is more like a portal to other things.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:47:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Uncategorized &amp;#8211; the post unleashed</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/uncategorized_8211_the_post_unleashed/#comment-21940656</link><description>In any event, you're welcome!   ;-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:17:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Uncategorized &amp;#8211; the post unleashed</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/uncategorized_8211_the_post_unleashed/#comment-21940348</link><description>In either case, you're welcome.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:11:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Observations on social media and political issues</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/observations_on_social_media_and_political_issues/#comment-21751387</link><description>Undoubtedly taxpayers will wind up footing the bill somehow...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:06:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Observations on social media and political issues</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/observations_on_social_media_and_political_issues/#comment-21751300</link><description>edwardsmith_fred:  Please see my Nov. 3 update in the blog post above:  Premier Graham now says that there's a potential large bill coming due for Mactaquac over the next ten years.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:03:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Observations on social media and political issues</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/observations_on_social_media_and_political_issues/#comment-21668483</link><description>edwardsmith_fred:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To your point, the price tag to fix or do something with Mactaquac is unknown, so I wasn't accurate there, although I was trying to go from memory.  However, as ClaudeB points out below, the dam does have problems.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as NB Power's debt goes, they may have paid down $1.0 billion, but they've taken on additional debt because if you check their annual reports for the past five years (which I did), the net debt is increasing, not decreasing, if you add up the figures available through 2007-2008 - I couldn't find 2008-2009's financial results.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:16:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The power of social media to prevent change</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/the_power_of_social_media_to_prevent_change/#comment-21266261</link><description>That's a good perspective, Bill.  Afterall, megaphones and microphones don't actually do anything other than transmit sound, right?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:01:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The power of social media to prevent change</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/the_power_of_social_media_to_prevent_change/#comment-21250820</link><description>Thanks Pamela.  I think I'm going to create a new blog for this topic.  And tax hikes, although I can understand why they're necessary in some cases, are no fun.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:38:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 32 Sci-Fi Novels You Should Read</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/32_sci_fi_novels_you_should_read/#comment-21015719</link><description>Dan Simmons. Read his books.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Name</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:18:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The blogosphere is as real as the public in public opinon</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/the_blogosphere_is_as_real_as_the_public_in_public_opinon/#comment-20995559</link><description>yeah, absolutely! I totally sympathized with the frustration, both yours and his...I feel the same way a lot myself</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">syrimne1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:36:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The blogosphere is as real as the public in public opinon</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/the_blogosphere_is_as_real_as_the_public_in_public_opinon/#comment-20995130</link><description>I see what you're saying now.  I see your point but I can understand some frustration over the "wishy washy" statement as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:22:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The blogosphere is as real as the public in public opinon</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/the_blogosphere_is_as_real_as_the_public_in_public_opinon/#comment-20993541</link><description>Oh, agreed - but the "Blogging with Integrity" folks weren't the ones I meant! And they weren't silent...instead they came out with a wishy washy statement, which isn't the same thing at all. I didn't mean to disparage his post, I just think sometimes people inadvertantly fuel phenomena simply by reacting to them...it takes more self-discipline to be silent about it, and try to populate the blogosphere with more intelligent discourse. Those who could contribute a lot sometimes seem to think they need to solve the problem by fighting it directly, and I guess I disagree that that is always the best approach.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">syrimne1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:28:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The blogosphere is as real as the public in public opinon</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/the_blogosphere_is_as_real_as_the_public_in_public_opinon/#comment-20966174</link><description>Perhaps there's a lot of drama there, but I think he had a valid point about the Blogging With Integrity badges and reaction of the other bloggers.  It doesn't mean that the female blogger in question would need to be ostracized by her peers or community, but silence would seem to indicate a lack of will to live by the standards implied in the underlying code of conduct.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 07:16:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers, serendipity, and the time to browse</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/newspapers_serendipity_and_the_time_to_browse/#comment-20787561</link><description>Hah, things they never told you before you became a parent, huh?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:00:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers, serendipity, and the time to browse</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/newspapers_serendipity_and_the_time_to_browse/#comment-20774521</link><description>Great post, Chris.  I commented on your blog as well.   Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:00:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers, serendipity, and the time to browse</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/newspapers_serendipity_and_the_time_to_browse/#comment-20696149</link><description>Hi Glen, there does seem to be a difference between how generations get their news.  My parents are avid newspaper readers as well, but they've only gotten high speed Internet access during the past couple of years, which makes a difference.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another thing to consider is that in many cases we're still reading content generated by news organizations, just via electronic media.  However, if we slice and dice what we choose to read, we may lose some of the serendipity effect that Mathew wrote about.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:11:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Life at the Scale of the Internet</title><link>http://wingsofwax.disqus.com/life_at_the_scale_of_the_internet/#comment-20264207</link><description>Thanks for the recommendation, Mark! That's exactly why I read your stuff; the call to action is nothing more than "Dudes, think about this, will you?" and it's usually work thinking about.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll look up the Schwartz book as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iRountree</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:09:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Life at the Scale of the Internet</title><link>http://wingsofwax.disqus.com/life_at_the_scale_of_the_internet/#comment-20258091</link><description>It looks like I managed to make you care.  :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Barry Schwartz wrote a book on a similar topic called "The Paradox of Choice".  There's a Wikipedia article on it which summarizes his case.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 07:01:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Life at the Scale of the Internet</title><link>http://wingsofwax.disqus.com/life_at_the_scale_of_the_internet/#comment-20257968</link><description>Fortunately, it looks like I convinced you to care.  :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven't read it but Barry Schwartz wrote "The Paradox of Choice", a book that seems to address a similar concern.  Basically, too much choice either drives us back to the familiar or else we don't choose at all and go to something with simpler.  You could argue that's why Twitter because successful:  it was simple, limited, and easy to learn.  There's a more detailed explanation here:  &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Paradox_of_Choice" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Paradox_of_Choice&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 06:53:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Five crucial tips for bloggers to profit from forums</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/five_crucial_tips_for_bloggers_to_profit_from_forums/#comment-20095604</link><description>Thanks Mark. I'll need all the luck and determination I can muster I think, but I am feeling super determined.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christine Holroyd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:45:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Five crucial tips for bloggers to profit from forums</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/five_crucial_tips_for_bloggers_to_profit_from_forums/#comment-20010824</link><description>Good luck!  I'm not very strong on the monetization side, but I'm sure that there are plenty of people there who are.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:01:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: From ProBlogger</title><link>http://wingsofwax.disqus.com/from_problogger/#comment-20006735</link><description>Thanks! The fifty or so posts ahead of this were the usual "Akismet, WordPress, Google stuff, did I mention WordPress" type lists. Figured it was worth being different.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iRountree</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:38:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Desiderata &amp;#8211; a poem by Max Ehrmann</title><link>http://wingsofwax.disqus.com/desiderata_8211_a_poem_by_max_ehrmann/#comment-20006677</link><description>Bizarrely I hadn't heard of it until this weekend. Considering all fhe kerfuffle about complication and speedng the world up, it seemed timely.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iRountree</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:37:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shuddering Geek Moment</title><link>http://wingsofwax.disqus.com/shuddering_geek_moment/#comment-20006519</link><description>What got me was more the density of my people who have blogs and fail to update them - except with the natural "Golly, sorry I haven't written more" - which never fails to amuse.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iRountree</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:34:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shuddering Geek Moment</title><link>http://wingsofwax.disqus.com/shuddering_geek_moment/#comment-20004531</link><description>I only have a small number of "real life" friends who blog.  Oh well.  I can live with that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkDykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:45:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>