<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for adventureran</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/adventureran/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:45:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: ReadAir Isn&amp;#8217;t Ready Yet</title><link>http://sarahintampa.disqus.com/readair_isn8217t_ready_yet/#comment-466157</link><description>I completely agree with your assessment.  I couldn't stand it.  I use Prism to do the same as tommyl does with Fluid on the Mac.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adventureran</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:45:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The crazy baseball fan rule (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/the_crazy_baseball_fan_rule_scripting_news/#comment-377972</link><description>This is a tough one.  On one hand, I agree with you and will extend this to include newspapers that openly endorse candidates.  Aren't newspapers supposed to "report" the news?  It is true there are editorials that are merely one person's opinion, but for a newspaper as a whole to endorse any candidate, to me, is wrong.  Who makes this decision anyway?  Do they take an internal vote of their employees?  Are employees who disagree ostracized?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, you and many, many others who have large audiences, including entertainers, also endorse candidates and use their celebrity status to promote their own agendas.  How do we monetize or regulate endorsements such as these or the ones you mention?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is a debate not even ABC could screw up.  Well .... maybe.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adventureran</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:42:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>