<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for awilensky</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/awilensky/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:11:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Let's Get On With It</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/lets_get_on_with_it/#comment-14347009</link><description>That's not in the cards. I get paid every day by the people like you who engage here</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:11:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let's Get On With It</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/lets_get_on_with_it/#comment-14340278</link><description>I would pay for AVC. That's one out of 400 feeds that I skim everyday.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">awilensky</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:28:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pay Attention to GM This Week</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/pay_attention_to_gm_this_week/#comment-10348007</link><description>Too big to fail, too stupid to succeed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">awilensky</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 07:53:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pay Attention to GM This Week</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/pay_attention_to_gm_this_week/#comment-10348000</link><description>For the money we poured into this moribund company, we could have built a new industry from scratch around the new innovators like Tesla, Bright, and others.  No amount of tweets and posts from any big three source would ever have credibility/</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">awilensky</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 07:52:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ollie</title><link>http://gothamgal.disqus.com/ollie/#comment-10330203</link><description>Is he? That's hilarious.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gothamgal</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 21:17:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ollie</title><link>http://gothamgal.disqus.com/ollie/#comment-10330004</link><description>Mrs. Wilson:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is that dog smiling? Don't tell me he's not smiling.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">awilensky</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 21:06:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ShareMe -The Mobile Future : Weblog</title><link>http://shareme.disqus.com/shareme_the_mobile_future_weblog_7720/#comment-9792403</link><description>That would be a coup for them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">awilensky</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 10:35:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/early-adopters-and-finding-next-shiny.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_728/#comment-9492965</link><description>Louis, I think this syndrome is now clustering around "real time streams". Everyone is writing posts and real articles about the messianic coming of real time updates; when it is hardly proven that real-time steams are advantageous or not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I always thought that relevant and contextual  was the real need, but now that everyone and the brother is streaming real time updates, that is the shiny new thing. ech.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">awilensky</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 09:26:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook raises $150 million more to cash out employees</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/facebook_raises_150_million_more_to_cash_out_employees/#comment-9477908</link><description>Linkedin isn't even in the same discussion here. The number of people who use it on a daily basis is a &lt;a href="http://bokardo.com/archives/everyday-app/" rel="nofollow"&gt;fraction compared to Facebook&lt;/a&gt;. I've made far more business connections and contacts through Facebook than I have through LI due to the sheer number of people who are on FB. In fact, I've sat here thinking for 5 minutes and can only come up with four people in my life who aren't on FB.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Furthermore, easily half of the number of friends/family I keep in regular contact with is via Facebook. Phone calls are too time consuming, email can be a chore, but Facebook is the perfect equilibrium. It may not be a mission critical utility, but it sure as heck makes this 28-year-olds life much more connected and easier.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 15:18:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook raises $150 million more to cash out employees</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/facebook_raises_150_million_more_to_cash_out_employees/#comment-9476371</link><description>your question is stupid. Even in the corporate world, most people have no idea what linkedin is. If that tree fell, no one would care. Myspace would have a greater effect. Facebook is huge for people without time. As a tech, I've spent a decade trying to convince people that it's easier to host your own blog than use blogspot. I've told them it's easier to build and server base back up system than to go without. etc on into infinity. people like easy and they like flashy. Facebook is dead simple to use.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">facebook-654557565</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 14:40:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook raises $150 million more to cash out employees</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/facebook_raises_150_million_more_to_cash_out_employees/#comment-9473079</link><description>I'm asking about facebook. It's gone, now what? How is the world or work changed?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I might say that losing a utility like Linkedin might have more real world impact than losing FB to its non-business model.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">awilensky</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 12:58:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook raises $150 million more to cash out employees</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/facebook_raises_150_million_more_to_cash_out_employees/#comment-9472597</link><description>How would your life or career be affected if there were no TV,sports,music,movies,outdoor activities, name-your-favorite-pastime? Certainly we don't "need" them, right?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Antypas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 12:31:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook raises $150 million more to cash out employees</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/facebook_raises_150_million_more_to_cash_out_employees/#comment-9469473</link><description>What are you 12? How would your life or career be materially affected if there were no Facebook? We are all acting like this is a mission critical utility.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">awilensky</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 08:40:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook raises $150 million more to cash out employees</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/facebook_raises_150_million_more_to_cash_out_employees/#comment-9467578</link><description>Why all the hate?  Ive met a lot of old friends on facebook, and it makes it easy to keep up with friends I dont have enough time to hang out with in person regularly or have moved far away.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obviously, there are people who like Facebook.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoff H</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 04:13:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook raises $150 million more to cash out employees</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/facebook_raises_150_million_more_to_cash_out_employees/#comment-9451350</link><description>If Facebook were to disappear overnight, who would really be the poorer?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">awilensky</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:55:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/every-piece-of-infrastructure-carries.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_8916/#comment-9144477</link><description>I wouldn't say "worried" is the right word. What I was trying to illustrate with this post is that there are many different factors that could impact uptime (or lack thereof). FriendFeed being down today is timely. The discussion of URL shorteners is timely. The conversation of FF.im happened just this week, so it's a good example. Yes, you are right in terms of addressing cloud, hosted services, and survivability. We need to have contingency plans in place for our data, wherever it is.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">louismg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:22:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/every-piece-of-infrastructure-carries.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_8916/#comment-9144388</link><description>You are worried about Friend feed and URL shorteners? We have an entirely new regime of hosting services (cloud, SAAS, PAAS), that is in the process of trying to convince the fat part of the mid market that they can eschew commodity servers in the closet down the hallway, and roll out capital line of business onto elastic cloud services. Now, this will be a conundrum. Until the industry can make an convincing argument (other than keeping completely duplicate systems and comm links), the SME is going to be a tough sell. These are mission critical use cases - POS system, a mid range distributed rapid replenishment system, etc. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many of the venture-backed cloud start ups have not addressed the survivability issues, and as a corollary, the insure-ability issue. There is not one specialty business underwriter that would touch these under capitalized, thinly equipped, and unrated services. The industry is offering minor alternatives for otherwise existing managed services where the actual, functional differences are virtually indiscernible. Managed services for legacy AS400 applications are far better cases for outsourced remote services.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In order for the industry to thrive, it must address the doubts of the SME, until the outages can be indemnified, there will be no major buy in from the SME.  What you can't insure, you can't rely on; someone has to underwrite and price risk - even if the answer is SELF insurance.      &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FriendFeed is down? Please. Cry me a river.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">awilensky</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:18:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Express Blues</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/the_american_express_blues/#comment-8986786</link><description>that's a big problem, if true</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 13:53:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The American Express Blues</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/the_american_express_blues/#comment-8957447</link><description>One of my best buddies us an IS analyst for the financial industry. He knows the in-out of Amex's centralized scoring and fraud detection center, and many of the key personnel, he claims, have turned over.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">awilensky</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 15:38:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twine Gets Google Reader Inspired Makeover</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/twine_gets_google_reader_inspired_makeover/#comment-8633740</link><description>I have really tried to use the service, and after several weeks my opinion is that it adds nothing to my on-line experience.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">awilensky</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:50:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Power Of Passed Links (continued)</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/the_power_of_passed_links_continued/#comment-8476625</link><description>Alan, have you seen &lt;a href="http://www.bzzster.com?" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.bzzster.com?&lt;/a&gt; one-click way to email links.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jay Meattle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:30:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BlueOrganizer Tip: Uninstall</title><link>http://adaptiveblue.disqus.com/blueorganizer_tip_uninstall/#comment-8461431</link><description>Glue added nothing to my on-line experience.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">awilensky</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:13:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Power Of Passed Links (continued)</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/the_power_of_passed_links_continued/#comment-8418130</link><description>Got it</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:15:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Power Of Passed Links (continued)</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/the_power_of_passed_links_continued/#comment-8418032</link><description>I meant that it figures that what was found to be most often used is the most unwieldy. It take more clicks and the shared links are harder to manage - which doesn't seem to matter to most people, but mean everything to me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">awilensky</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:09:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Power Of Passed Links (continued)</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/the_power_of_passed_links_continued/#comment-8417951</link><description>Email is the most effective he says</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:03:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>