<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for azizhp</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/azizhp/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:12:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Newest Way To Game Twitter - Fake Followers</title><link>http://wolfsbayne.disqus.com/the_newest_way_to_game_twitter_fake_followers_11/#comment-6405674</link><description>how are the suggested sites chosen? is it algorithmic somehow or just a handpicked group?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">azizhp</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:12:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where is Twitter's WordPress? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/where_is_twitters_wordpress_scripting_news/#comment-6368976</link><description>Exactly. I'm wondering why Prologue/WordPress didn't make it to be #3? There are alternatives out there. Simply use them. I'm micro-blogging at &lt;a href="http://Wir-sprechen-Online.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://Wir-sprechen-Online.com&lt;/a&gt;, a WordPress.com-Prologue-blog that sends my "tweets" to Twitter, other (Laconica based) micro-blogging services, and even Facebook. Those centralized services remain as a feedback-channel. At least for a transition period...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eicker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:46:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where is Twitter's WordPress? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/where_is_twitters_wordpress_scripting_news/#comment-6358664</link><description>if you're interested i can easily set up a demo. drop me an email at &lt;a href="mailto:apoonawa-blog@yahoo.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;apoonawa-blog@yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">azizhp</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:57:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where is Twitter's WordPress? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/where_is_twitters_wordpress_scripting_news/#comment-6357420</link><description>actually, the Prologue Theme for Wordpress pretty much fits the bill. Anyone who runs wordpress can use it. For a great example, see Talk Islam: &lt;a href="http://talkislam.info" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://talkislam.info&lt;/a&gt;. Note that if you run Prologue on Wordpress MU, you can also use the Buddypress plugins and thereby get direct messaging and profile functionality too. its basically feature complete, aside from @replies (but that could be a simple plugin).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">azizhp</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:46:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Archiving Twitter in OPML (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/archiving_twitter_in_opml_scripting_news/#comment-5839079</link><description>This has a lot of promise as a general backup tool for people. There's a crying need for it since &lt;a href="http://www.metablog.us/blogging/backing-up-your-tweets/" rel="nofollow"&gt;none of the other solutions&lt;/a&gt; to back up your tweets (limited to three thousand) really are ideal. Would it be possible to run this as a service that people could use to download the archives for themselves and whoever else they want to follow? I know I'd pay $5 upfront for access to the service, too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also - if at all possible, the first level of @replies should also be backed up. Can that be done? otherwise you risk losing the conversations that are half the reason to be on twitter in the first place.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">azizhp</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:31:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The White House website (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/the_white_house_website_scripting_news/#comment-5428459</link><description>I have to &lt;a href="http://www.metablog.us/blogging/the-whitehousegov-blog-open-government/" rel="nofollow"&gt;disagree with you - I think the site does serve as the two-way briefing book&lt;/a&gt; you describe, or at least it will if they live up to what they promise in the first post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">azizhp</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:19:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Even During a Recession, Small Businesses Still Should Consider Macbooks</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/even_during_a_recession_small_businesses_still_should_consider_macbooks/#comment-3072930</link><description>Again, I don't know of any companies who use a free PDF creator over Adboe.&lt;br&gt;Maybe if they are in the non-profit space. But Acrobat is justified as "cost&lt;br&gt;of doing business". Plus, it's the geekier who know about those options and&lt;br&gt;the decision makers are not usually the geeky among us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">technosailor</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:53:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Even During a Recession, Small Businesses Still Should Consider Macbooks</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/even_during_a_recession_small_businesses_still_should_consider_macbooks/#comment-3072890</link><description>many compaies use PDF. In fact, all of them. But few need to buy Adobe to do it. At any rate, the embedded PDF creation functionality in Mac OS X is not equivalent to the total package of functionality you get with Adobe's flagship software, either, so this is another apples-oranges (heh) comparison, in addition to the point I make about Office below.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">azizhp</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:51:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Even During a Recession, Small Businesses Still Should Consider Macbooks</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/even_during_a_recession_small_businesses_still_should_consider_macbooks/#comment-3072857</link><description>doPDF is a freeware application for PDF creation. So that shaves $449 off the estimate right there. And you're comparing iLife to Office Pro? a fair comparison would be Office for Mac instead.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">azizhp</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:49:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Edwards scandal idicts MSM and political bloggers (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/edwards_scandal_idicts_msm_and_political_bloggers_scripting_news/#comment-1145771</link><description>&lt;a href="http://dean2004.blogspot.com/2008/08/id-rather-be-wrong-than-right.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Further thoughts here&lt;/a&gt;. I wish I'd been wrong.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">azizhp</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 12:00:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Thoughts On The John Edwards Affair</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/10_thoughts_on_the_john_edwards_affair/#comment-1145765</link><description>&lt;a href="http://dean2004.blogspot.com/2008/08/id-rather-be-wrong-than-right.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Further thoughts here&lt;/a&gt;. I wish I'd been wrong.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">azizhp</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 12:00:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Thoughts On The John Edwards Affair</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/10_thoughts_on_the_john_edwards_affair/#comment-1145691</link><description>I must note that I was &lt;a href="http://dean2004.blogspot.com/2008/07/shame-of-john-edwards.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;one of the few political bloggers&lt;/a&gt; - and the sole lefty political blogger, who favored Edwards for Veep - to take the story seriously. I also &lt;a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/7/23/93645/6608/705/555588" rel="nofollow"&gt;diaried it at DailyKos&lt;/a&gt; and was predictably flamed into oblivion</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">azizhp</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 11:48:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Edwards scandal idicts MSM and political bloggers (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/edwards_scandal_idicts_msm_and_political_bloggers_scripting_news/#comment-1145640</link><description>actually, I was &lt;a href="http://dean2004.blogspot.com/2008/07/shame-of-john-edwards.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;one of the few political bloggers&lt;/a&gt; - and a (the sole?) lefty political blogger, mind you, who favored Edwards for Veep - to take the story seriously. I also &lt;a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/7/23/93645/6608/705/555588" rel="nofollow"&gt;diaried it at DailyKos&lt;/a&gt; and was predictably flamed into oblivion.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">azizhp</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 11:40:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Goodbye FriendFeed</title><link>http://crisatunity.disqus.com/goodbye_friendfeed/#comment-1012256</link><description>Heartily agreed. I was thinking along much the same lines, because it seems that the consequence of web 2.0 was a &lt;a href="http://www.slideshare.net/azizhp/the-problem-with-web20-528566/" rel="nofollow"&gt;fragmentation of content and conversations&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">azizhp</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:04:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>