<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for bbittner</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-a4e8a4c3" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/bbittner/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:38:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: New Star Trek Clip: Bones is afraid to fly!</title><link>http://dashpunk.com/2009/04/07/star-trek-clip-bones-afraid-fly/#comment-8017210</link><description>My gosh. There were some lines that were delivered with an inflection almost identical to DeForest Kelly's inflection. Like Deforest got all hot and bothered about Genesis. Paraphrasing: "But here comes Genesis. Now we can do it in one day."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm pretty excited about the movie. That's because, like I've said it before, it's about the characters. As long as they get the characters right, I don't care that much about the plot. so what if it has too much action and is too much like Star Wars. Hell, put the write actors, saying the right things, and reacting the right way, you could put them in Fast and Furious and it would work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:38:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Severus Snape &amp;#8220;I Will Survive&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://dashpunk.com/2009/02/28/severus-snape-survive/#comment-6723626</link><description>SPOILERS AHEAD&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Snape has always been my favorite character in the Harry Potter universe. Especially in Alan Rickman's form. I've always been a sucker for baddies-turned-good, or baddies-possibly-turning-good characters. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And when I read that Harry's son was named "Albus Severus Potter," I got so choked up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My only disappointment is how he died in Book 7. His death could have been a lot more dramatic, or ironic. He could have done something like Rowling did with Neville. Maybe kill one of Voldemort's key lieutenants before he died.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:35:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is it Ok to Celebrate Christmas, Even If You’re Not a Christian? - ExChristian.Net - Articles</title><link>http://exchristian.net/exchristian/2008/12/is-it-ok-to-celebrate-christmas-even-if.html#comment-4544503</link><description>Even when I was Christian, Christmas was ALWAYS about the TOYS!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:01:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saving Star Trek</title><link>http://projectshadow.com/symposium/2008/10/15/saving-star-trek/#comment-3131521</link><description>I don't think adding action to Star Trek would be bad. There was plenty of action in all the series and movies. And action is relative. Today's audiences are more desensitized. To them, the original Star Wars movies must look positively dull when compared to today's action movies. You add the action from the original Star Wars movies to Star Trek, and today's audiences will barely notice it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, I don't agree with the concept that Star Wars equals action and Star Trek equals rational thinking. To me, Star Wars equals the mythic struggle between good and evil, and Star Trek is about CHARACTERS. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can't say whether I like Star Wars more than Star Trek or not. But I can say that I like the characters in Star Trek better than those in Star Wars. Star Wars characters are stock. They're symbols. The Star Trek characters are real. And "human". (Especially the non-humans). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love all the characters in all the series and movies. But especially, Spock, Bones, Scotty, Data, Worf, Quark, Odo, and the Doctor in Voyager. (Heck, the Quark-centered episodes were my favorite in the DS9 series.) And one of the reasons I enjoy Star Trek novels, is that I love and know the characters. I can't say the same for Star Wars novels.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, even though I'm looking forward to this new Star Trek movie, and expect plenty of action, it's the characters that are going to make it for me. And from what I know of the cast, I know it won't disappoint. (Especially Spock!) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And that image of the cast (minus Spock) is awesome. You can tell the makers of this movie are putting substance over style. They all look real. Not perfect-looking movie stars. Character and story will be king. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can not wait.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:01:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If the press will just do their job, all will be OK (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/11/ifThePressWillJustDoTheirJ.html#comment-2301677</link><description>I left a comment on your article on the Huffington Post. I wanted to leave a link to my referring to your article on my blog. But the comment fiter wouldn't let me. So here it is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://whatbillthinks.blogspot.com/2008/09/dave-winer-nails-mccain-and-palin-and.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://whatbillthinks.blogspot.com/2008/09/dave...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:01:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN.com Finally Catches Up on Palin Church Video</title><link>http://thepete.com/cnncom-finally-catches-up-on-palin-church-video/#comment-2240237</link><description>Watching the Rachel Maddow show right now (9:20 PM EST) and their finally airing and discussing this video.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:20:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Palin&amp;#8217;s Religious Views Scare Me</title><link>http://thepete.com/palins-religious-views-scare-me/#comment-2114865</link><description>I'm glad my clippings were of some interest to you. And your tweets have been a breath of sane air. I've been troubled about this whole campaign. And I lost some sleep over it last night. I mean to blog my thoughts on it all, but am waiting till after McCain's speech.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:53:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Occult Heroes: X-men</title><link>http://projectshadow.com/symposium/2008/08/28/occult-heroes-x-men/#comment-1926984</link><description>You're right, the look is Victorian, but not necessarily steampunk. But, I guess if there was only one aspect of the characters that could be steampunk, it was that McCoy got that way because of a laboratory experiment. But I guess that could also be Victorian Gothic as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:19:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Occult Heroes: X-men</title><link>http://projectshadow.com/symposium/2008/08/28/occult-heroes-x-men/#comment-1901439</link><description>If so, I guess Hellboy would probably be in that genre, right?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:22:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Occult Heroes: X-men</title><link>http://projectshadow.com/symposium/2008/08/28/occult-heroes-x-men/#comment-1898789</link><description>That is pretty freaking sweet. At first glance, it's overall look is steampunk. But upon a closer look, it's all more occult-ish. Is that such a genre? Occult-punk?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, I posted an idea on the deviantART page about another character idea. It's pretty obvious, but here it is anyway...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A clockpunk automaton brought to life by Rasputin, who he simply named "Pitor"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:28:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kevin Smith Digs Star Trek?</title><link>http://projectshadow.com/symposium/2008/08/25/kevin-smith-digs-star-trek/#comment-1830548</link><description>Seems pretty obvious to me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:31:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exploring The Mummy: Tomb Of The Dragon Emperor</title><link>http://projectshadow.com/symposium/2008/08/04/exploring-the-mummy-tomb-of-the-dragon-emperor/#comment-1126823</link><description>I've always liked Brandon. He rarely takes himself too seriously. And there are some moments in "Bedazzled" where he is just hilarious.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:27:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here we go again!</title><link>http://projectshadow.com/symposium/2008/07/04/here-we-go-again/#comment-864162</link><description>What's the panel subject?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:56:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: P:SI #189 &amp;quot;No Stairway&amp;#8230; Denied!&amp;quot;</title><link>http://projectshadow.com/2008/07/03/psi-189-no-stairway-denied/#comment-861123</link><description>Really appreciated your mention of the fact that you publish your stuff (or at least some of it) under CC with the hope that people create works in the world you built. That is one of the hopes I have with my stuff. (In fact, sometimes I think I'd rather have somebody just take my ideas and just run with them. But that's just me being lazy.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:15:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Theater or Renter WALL&amp;middot;E</title><link>http://projectshadow.com/symposium/2008/06/24/theater-or-renter-walle/#comment-813774</link><description>Saw this last night. Maybe be my favorite Pixar movie yet. Smiled and/or laughed through the whole movie.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:36:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here we go again!</title><link>http://projectshadow.com/symposium/2008/07/04/here-we-go-again/#comment-813766</link><description>Wow. Cool batch of guests. I'd love to meet George Takei.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:34:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MySocial 24x7 - Companion for FriendFeed</title><link>http://mysocial247.com/#comment-788633</link><description>When choose to see all of my posts (Me&amp;gt;Everything), the window is blank. But if I select a specific service (Me&amp;gt;Friendfeed), stuff shows up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:14:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Life as a Story</title><link>http://projectshadow.com/symposium/2008/05/16/life-as-a-story/#comment-502346</link><description>Found a poem today that is relevant to this. Babylon, by Robert Graves&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.daypoems.net/poems/2717.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.daypoems.net/poems/2717.html&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 09:16:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Life as a Story</title><link>http://projectshadow.com/symposium/2008/05/16/life-as-a-story/#comment-481479</link><description>What an excellent post. Thank you for taking the time to write it and share it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bbittner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:36:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>