<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of berkleebassist</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/berkleebassist/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:42:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A License Required for your house? It&amp;#039;s a flat out lie.</title><link>http://briandigital.tumblr.com/post/234937940#comment-26732509</link><description>Read the bill. You won't need your tin foil hat for that, I suppose.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briandigital</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:42:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reader Poll: How Did You Get Here?</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/282760516#comment-25818917</link><description>Hahaha, I'll be sure to tell Hamlet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:11:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reader Poll: How Did You Get Here?</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/282760516#comment-25818903</link><description>Yeah, I always tried to make it clear to reporters that my sex life was NOT representative of the Harvard experience (especially since it wouldn't have been very interesting if I'd kept all my escapades on campus). Thanks for reading!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:11:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reader Poll: How Did You Get Here?</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/282760516#comment-25813061</link><description>Not the only one, actually! My friend Christine Yu, who writes a sex column for MIT, is actually from Huntington too. Nice coincidence :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:04:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the ch!cktionary - It’s almost Hamlet’s birthday! He turns FOUR on...</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/283861442#comment-25812083</link><description>lol @ "whose tongue often threatens to engulf his head"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:48:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the ch!cktionary - It’s almost Hamlet’s birthday! He turns FOUR on...</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/283861442#comment-25812069</link><description>Thanks Lisa :) I love hearing from long-term readers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:48:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reader Poll: How Did You Get Here?</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/282760516#comment-25808262</link><description>Thanks, so much has changed since I was 19 :) It's hard to believe that I've lived online for THREE years and counting!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:08:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reader Poll: How Did You Get Here?</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/282760516#comment-25808191</link><description>I remember that we met but I've totally forgotten the context. (After some other correspondence, I think? Or maybe I just Facebook stalked you.) Were you '09? Find me on Facebook!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:06:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reader Poll: How Did You Get Here?</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/282760516#comment-25808019</link><description>I guess personal blogs that involve sex, feminism, AND bulldogs are rare -- but Feministing and Jezebel are great community blogs. And check out the blog of Aussie journalist Rachel Hills: &lt;a href="http://rachelhills.tumblr.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://rachelhills.tumblr.com&lt;/a&gt;. I think you'll find some of her work and commentary very interesting!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:03:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reader Poll: How Did You Get Here?</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/282760516#comment-25807819</link><description>You're not the first Jordanian reader :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:58:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reader Poll: How Did You Get Here?</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/282760516#comment-25807790</link><description>A college tour? Whoa, bizarre. I can only imagine the context: "Sex And The Ivy: Why Harvard Isn't All It's Cracked Up To Be."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:58:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reader Poll: How Did You Get Here?</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/282760516#comment-25807631</link><description>Ah, BerryLine! And then ... nothing. Hopefully you've made more literary progress than I have in the intervening time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:54:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Feminists Guilty Of Virgin Shaming?</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/278257154#comment-25587247</link><description>I can't believe you're wasting time leaving comments under different names.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 02:52:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Feminists Guilty Of Virgin Shaming?</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/278257154#comment-25573737</link><description>Thanks for sharing your experience. About half my friends are virgins by choice but are far from conservative. The abstinence movement at large does not reflect their beliefs at all, yet the only time virginity tends to be discussed in mainstream media is when there's talk of culture wars. The more nuanced views don't get represented.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:53:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Feminists Guilty Of Virgin Shaming?</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/278257154#comment-25573616</link><description>Very good point! Stubbornly advocating anything -- be it abstinence or promiscuity -- as the best approach is the least productive way of advancing healthy, unrestricted notions of female sexuality.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:49:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Feminists Guilty Of Virgin Shaming?</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/278257154#comment-25507308</link><description>Can you cite a source for the claim that "Most promiscuous girls have a history of childhood abuse, being raped, come from broken homes, have abusive fathers, etc. 99% of the time". As far as I know, there is no empirical basis for this. In fact, the majority of Americans born from the 1940s on have had premarital sex.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See: Lawrence Finer's "Trends in premarital sex in the United States, 1954–2003"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:17:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the ch!cktionary - 5 Reasons Why Women Should Consider An IUD</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/277687387#comment-25469837</link><description>Hey Trish, you have an awesome job! I took a class on motherhood a couple years ago, and it amazed me how much misinformation there is about pregnancy and childbirth.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:59:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Full Immersion</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/269511898#comment-25349485</link><description>Nah, I'll be in the company of Germans :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:36:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the ch!cktionary - Der kleiner Hund in der großen Küche (“the little...</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/276329687#comment-25349074</link><description>Corrected, thanks. The roomie pointed that out too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ugh, adjectives. My most recent foe!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:29:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the ch!cktionary - Der kleiner Hund in der großen Küche (“the little...</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/276329687#comment-25314225</link><description>Yeah, I know, but it's in the dative case in the above construction. Post a photo of your Frenchie!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:56:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the ch!cktionary - Der kleiner Hund in der großen Küche (“the little...</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/276329687#comment-25310575</link><description>Layout? Nah, it's the same, no?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:01:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the ch!cktionary - Anatomy of an Outfit: “Reading Period Edition”
 
...</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/275428313#comment-25305406</link><description>It's not the only one I've stolen! Doesn't really work vice versa though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 12:10:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the ch!cktionary - Anatomy of an Outfit: “Reading Period Edition”
 
...</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/275428313#comment-25231389</link><description>The majority of Harvard kids are not coked out and do not have trust funds, but "smart" doesn't always translate to good grades (and vice versa). And good grades aren't always enough to get people what they want, be it a job or a grad school acceptance.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:46:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the ch!cktionary - Anatomy of an Outfit: “Reading Period Edition”
 
...</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/275428313#comment-25223238</link><description>Pie is never something to be ashamed of.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:16:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dartmouth Student Jeremy Pham Will &amp;quot;Plant A Dagger In Your Ass&amp;quot;, Thinks Wellesley Women Are &amp;quot;A Bunch Of Whores&amp;quot;</title><link>http://thechicktionary.com/post/261342305#comment-24919417</link><description>Yeah, relatively speaking, Asian guys get screwed when it comes to interracial dating in America. So do Black women. So do queer people who live in the Midwest. But it's not a competition between who is the worst off -- and besides, all this talk about sexual desirability is incredibly silly in light of all the things in the world that one could rightfully be bitter about.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lena</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:43:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>