<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for bfeld</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-a481f7bd" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/bfeld/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:45:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Getting Computer Science Into Middle School</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/12/getting-computer-science-into-middle-school.html#comment-26769132</link><description>Well said.  Jump in and help us Reform Computer Science Education - &lt;a href="http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2009/12/help-reform-computer-science-education.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2009/12/help-re...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:45:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We gotta do a deal together</title><link>http://bijansabet.com/post/290515258#comment-26676154</link><description>Don't forget that I've got money in OneRiot and BugLabs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:45:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We gotta do a deal together</title><link>http://bijansabet.com/post/290515258#comment-26674883</link><description>Sorry - couldn't help myself.  Great post.  By the way, it reminds me of my all time favorite New Yorker Cartoon.  It's the businessman on a phone standing behind his desk in front of a picture window view of Manhattan.  He says to the caller on the phone, "No, Thursday's Out. How About Never -- Is Never Good For You?"  I have one hanging on the wall in my office.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newyorkerstore.com/1993/No-Thursdays-out-How-about-never-is-never-good-for-you/invt/107277" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.newyorkerstore.com/1993/No-Thursdays...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:11:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We gotta do a deal together</title><link>http://bijansabet.com/post/290515258#comment-26674778</link><description>We gotta do a deal together.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:09:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: From Scans To Listens</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/12/from-scans-to-listens.html#comment-26168698</link><description>Fred - you are describing exactly what NextBigSound (one of the TechStars 2009 companies) is going after - &lt;a href="http://nextbigsound.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://nextbigsound.com/&lt;/a&gt;.  Here's the Lady Gaga example - &lt;a href="http://nextbigsound.com/nbs#plays%2Cmonth%2C659" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://nextbigsound.com/nbs#plays,month,659&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:10:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tenacity</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/12/tenacity.html#comment-26148398</link><description>And you held up very nicely on the run!  I was a great run, great talk, and anytime I get an email from you I'll know immediately reply and try to help.  Awesome example of tenacity.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:23:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: APIs In The Late Afternoon</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/11/apis-in-the-late-afternoon.html#comment-23333586</link><description>API's rule the world.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:10:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spotted: Zynga&amp;#8217;s Billboard on 101 (Grand Avenue)</title><link>http://ryanspoon.com/blog/2009/11/15/spotted-zyngas-billboard-on-101-grand-avenue/#comment-23161619</link><description>Jeff - you are a pretty good guesser!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:50:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Laid Off 2.0 </title><link>http://bijansabet.com/post/240207412#comment-22706171</link><description>Well said!  I'm a huge fan of Don's and the way this has played out for him is very interesting and instructive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:03:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Entrepreneur Corner Roundup: Surefire ways to get rejected by an angel investor and clearing up lean startup myths</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/11/07/entrepreneur-corner-roundup-surefire-ways-to-get-rejected-by-an-angel-investor-and-clearing-up-lean-startup-myths/#comment-22167605</link><description>Minor correction - the post above refers to me as an "angel investor." I'm actually a VC at Foundry Group (&lt;a href="http://www.foundrygroup.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.foundrygroup.com&lt;/a&gt;) - I wrote this as a "peer" to my VC colleagues (vs. as an angel investor being critical of VCs.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:57:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thematic vs Thesis Driven Investing</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/11/thematic-vs-thesis-driven-investing.html#comment-21661643</link><description>I think you are using the word "theme" where you really mean "trend" or "sector".  When I first started talking about "themes" in 2006, I don't think I heard the word very much - I remember specifically searching for a word that was different than "sector" since I'd lived through the "big firm sector approach" at Mobius.  Now that theme is "trendy", I hear it all the time, which is kind of a meta-trend (to be a "theme-oriented VC").  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another differentiator - which you point out - is whether each partner (or groups of partners) work on different "themes" (sectors/trends) or if everyone works on the same stuff.  The power of a small firm is that everyone can work on the same stuff - I'm always amazed when I run into small VC firms (five people or less) that have partners working on different things and subsequently don't get the leverage of a small team.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At the end of the day I know it's just semantics since it's all about the underlying strategy the VC firm has.  And - as you know - I like yours a lot!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:30:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 3 Favorite VC Bloggers</title><link>http://www.newcommbiz.com/my-3-favorite-vc-bloggers/#comment-20985114</link><description>Hey Tac - thanks for the call out.  My mom will be proud!  Holler if you are even in Boulder - the beers are on me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:43:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: State Of The Blogosphere Interview</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/state-of-the-blogosphere-interview.html#comment-20955202</link><description>Thanks Bijan.  I hope we (all three of us) help each other out on many things for a long time to come.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:11:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 'We Need To Own' Baloney</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/the-we-need-to-own-baloney.html#comment-20274586</link><description>I just caught up on a week of blogs and completely agree with this.  The right word is "want", not "need".  When a VC says "I need" at the starting point of a discussion, they are lying.  Or, they have created what in my mind is an illogical construct, especially if they are an early stage investor.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:26:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Stars</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/blog-stars.html#comment-20273566</link><description>That's just secret code between us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:58:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Stars</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/blog-stars.html#comment-20270039</link><description>I find Howard to be very self-referential.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 13:55:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Visas</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/09/startup-visas.html#comment-18299373</link><description>Edward - thanks for the info on E2.  I've explored this some and my understanding is that the E2 is a classic case of a "bought" visa - the visa is for the investor that controls the company they are establishing.  If my understanding of this is wrong, please tell me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The idea of modifying the E2 instead of the EB5 is a good one - I'll add that to the list to consider.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd be happy to have you involved in the StartupVisa effort along with any links to national experts on policy you think we should be talking to.  We do have strong immigration attorney's involved in the effort at this point but are open to more.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:57:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Founder Liquidity</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/09/founder-liquidity.html#comment-16063982</link><description>What Fred and Mark said.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 12:53:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Foursquare "Crush"</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/09/the-foursquare-crush.html#comment-16019856</link><description>Yeah, I suppose.  But my experience is that there is a natural set point to the price (e.g. maybe I was too low) and give my belief that if the entrepreneur is ONLY focused on price in the early round I'm probably not the right investor for them I'd rather have to deal with this while letting them know me better.  And - if it's something amazing, I'll meet whatever the clearing price is anyway without regret.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 08:57:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Foursquare "Crush"</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/09/the-foursquare-crush.html#comment-16019720</link><description>I so completely agree with this philosophy.  It's so hard to see the actual downside of this approach to investing / life in the private company / startup domain.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 08:49:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Speculating On What Private Companies Are Worth A Good Idea?</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/08/is-speculating-on-what-private-companies-are-worth-a-good-idea.html#comment-15651098</link><description>A wise man one told me "it's not real money until you can buy beer with it."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:30:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clouded Email Deliverability: Startups Pay Attention!</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/173846838#comment-15527786</link><description>Another solution is one of the TechStars Boulder 2009 companies - SendGrid.  &lt;a href="http://www.sendgrid.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.sendgrid.com&lt;/a&gt;  They are doing "transactional email delivery" for over 150 companies at this point and growing like crazy.  Our friends at Return Path (Matt Blumberg and George Bilbrey) have also been awesome mentors for them this summer as part of the TechStars program.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:45:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stocktwits&amp;#8230;Working The Social Leverage&amp;#8230;Ringing The Closing Bell</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4201#comment-15421722</link><description>Dude - you is the shizzle!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:01:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Patently Absurd: Proposing a Change to Litigation</title><link>http://continuations.com/post/171330180#comment-15355912</link><description>Assuming that the notion of a software patent is valid (I don't believe it is), these are both good suggestions.  The plaintiffs will argue that this gives unfair advantage to large companies (e.g. Microsoft will build up a nice defensive system in Seattle) but I think this is a spurious argument against this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:31:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NYC Marathon</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/nyc-marathon/#comment-15144876</link><description>Super proud of you Andrew!  If you are willing to run slow, I'll go for some long runs with you.  And - I'm good for $100 - just tell me what to do.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bfeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:16:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>