<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for brlewis</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-4844ee47" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/brlewis/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:38:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Backtype takes you where the pain is</title><link>http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2008-11-03#comment-21849105</link><description>You're welcome.  Backtype is definitely useful.  I use it daily.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:38:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Use Modern Web Sites: Do The Dumb Thing</title><link>http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-10-27#comment-21196766</link><description>There's a tradeoff to be made between transparency and simplicity.  I'm thinking about an advanced settings page and/or a wiki.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:04:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foliage Trip 2: Mount Morgan</title><link>http://ourdoings.com/brlewis/2009-10-13#comment-20787432</link><description>The GF1 looks awfully expensive.  When I have that kind of money for camera equipment, I'll probably buy a decent automatic lens for my DSLR.  (My good lenses are all manual.)  Even the LX3 is probably more pricey than we're looking for.  Most of our low-light/motion shots are kids in the house where the DSLR is hand, so the point+shoot can be cheap.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:58:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stop Abusing Robert Scoble for a Week</title><link>http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-10-21#comment-20787303</link><description>In that case it makes sense for you to do the interview.  You'll get growth information straight from the source, and know where to go from there.  I bet he won't speculate about future growth, not even near-term, since that's not his style.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. Don't thank me too much for this post.  I'm already planning abuse for next week.  :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:55:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which iPhone app is better, Dropbox or Pixelpipe?</title><link>http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-09-22#comment-19252737</link><description>Pixelpipe sent empty values to OurDoings:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;((media . "") (title . "") (message . ""))&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like it better when it's my bug, because then I can fix it.  But in this case it appears to be a Pixelpipe bug.  I'll report it to them.  I'll also give feedback to Dropbox about handling the bunch-of-photos use case better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:10:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which iPhone app is better, Dropbox or Pixelpipe?</title><link>http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-09-22#comment-19246927</link><description>Sounds like Pixelpipe beats Dropbox for this use.  I'll investigate what happened with the test Pixelpipe upload and get back to you by email.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:50:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inside the mind of a nervous friendfeed user</title><link>http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-08-11#comment-14772365</link><description>Silly, isn't it?  But what's really going on inside our minds when we worry about the acquisition?  If the acquisition is bad, either the FriendFeed founders dissed us, or they made a mistake.  And for them to make a mistake, they'd need something akin to brainwashing.  That's what we're really thinking, isn't it?  Silly or not, I think a detailed response from the founders on the "brainwashing" question is what would really help reassure us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:50:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inside the mind of a nervous friendfeed user</title><link>http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-08-11#comment-14694878</link><description>That's helpful to know.  I tend to think I'm representative of others, but it isn't always true.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:39:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Five Tasks in the Morning</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/five-tasks-in-the-morning/#comment-12705276</link><description>Chris, if you like dipping into FriendFeed, why not drop in on our FriendFeed meetup 5-6:45pm today at the Cambridgeside Galleria before webinno?  Jesse Stay of SocialToo is visiting from out of town.  &lt;a href="http://friendfeed.com/massachusetts/b50998cf/boston-friendfeed-meetup-wednesday-july-15-5-p-m" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://friendfeed.com/massachusetts/b50998cf/bo...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:05:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TwitSnaps jumps into competitive Twitter photo sharing space</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/07/01/twitsnaps-jumps-into-competitive-twitter-photo-sharing-space/#comment-11995397</link><description>Robert, where's Posterous in your list?  Posterous is going after twitpic with a vengeance.  They're in all the major Twitter clients now.  OurDoings isn't really shooting for twitter, much more for FriendFeed: &lt;a href="http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-05-27" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-05-27&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:57:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: API worlds are quite wondrous indeed</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/06/30/api-world/#comment-11950853</link><description>I've got a really cool API example, but can't talk about it yet.  Give me a few hours.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:17:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real-time systems hurting long-term knowledge?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/06/28/real-time-systems-hurting-long-term-knowledge/#comment-11879732</link><description>OurDoings won't go out of business because it hasn't gone into business yet.  I developed it and continue to build it as a side project.  Also, the comments live on FriendFeed and Disqus, just like on this blog.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:52:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed: A level playing field for the real-time web</title><link>http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2008-12-18#comment-10669686</link><description>A general explanation of SUP is at &lt;a href="http://blog.friendfeed.com/2008/08/simple-update-protocol-fetch-updates.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://blog.friendfeed.com/2008/08/simple-updat...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A general explanation of XMPP: &lt;a href="http://xmpp.org/tech/core.shtml" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://xmpp.org/tech/core.shtml&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:05:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Backups</title><link>http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-06-03#comment-10561866</link><description>Right.  I pass it through as an argument to the script (see the "$@" in the last line).  Initially I wanted to use the script more cautiously.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 08:38:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Backups</title><link>http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-06-03#comment-10561721</link><description>Thanks, that's really helpful.  So what I'll need eventually is an EC2 instance that can be the remote end of the rsync.  It would only need to be up for the duration of the backup, so it wouldn't have to cost a lot.  What I'll likely do medium-term is do this rsync once a week, and have the daily backup simply copy new files (via tar), so it won't have to navigate the whole remote filesystem to find things to delete.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 08:28:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Should You Do Everything As If It Matters?</title><link>http://sheenonline.biz/2009/05/why-should-you-do-everything-as-if-it-matters/#comment-10364484</link><description>Awesome post, Rah!  Even the things you love will involve work you don't want to do.  Developing a winning attitude will surely pay off.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:01:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flavio Piccioni, Robert Scoble, and Pavan Gunupudi, this is for you</title><link>http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-05-20#comment-10147266</link><description>This was simply me taking Robert Scoble's advice.  He has a lot to say about how to grow a service.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're here because I took Chris Brogan's advice.  There's a lot of great advice out there if people will just listen and do it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 08:04:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Be Naked</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/be-naked/#comment-10146982</link><description>Pranav, I totally relate to what you're saying.  I'm an introvert too.  Like most things, being social is something  you just learn by doing it.  You'll make mistakes along the way.  Like Chris says, be ready to apologize.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree about too many tools being a problem.  I've chosen to focus mainly on the one that clicks with me, FriendFeed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 07:57:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Make It Into My Inbox Without Getting Marked As Spam</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/how-to-make-it-into-my-inbox-without-getting-marked-as-spam/#comment-9797907</link><description>Now I'm jealous of StumbleUpon.  Feedback this thorough and good can't be bought.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:05:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Yorkers: the coolest iPhone app I have seen is this 3D mapping app:</title><link>http://ourdoings.com/robertscoble/2009-05-21#comment-9736930</link><description>Cool.  Looks like something you'd find in a future-predicting magazine article.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:30:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now Available: Commenting with Twitter Sign-in</title><link>http://blog.disqus.net/2009/05/15/twitter-signin/#comment-9368901</link><description>You all do have a lot of features now.  I'm having some trouble on the admin/settings page.  I keep checking Hacker News and Reddit, then Save, but the option doesn't stick.  The Twitter Sign-In option does stick.  What I mean is, after I click Save, I see the green bar that says your changes have been saved successfully, and the boxes are checked next to Hacker News and Reddit, but if I select a different site (using the big select box at the top) and come back, the boxes are then unchecked.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Additionally, social media reactions seems to have stopped working for FriendFeed comments.  Two days ago I was looking at &lt;a href="http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-04-14" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-04-14&lt;/a&gt; and there were lots of FriendFeed comments from &lt;a href="http://friendfeed.com/brlewis/ea49a700/how-non-profits-can-use-friendfeed" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://friendfeed.com/brlewis/ea49a700/how-non-...&lt;/a&gt; but yesterday and today I don't see them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:39:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why open formats are so important (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/05/12/whyOpenFormatsAreSoImporta.html#comment-9249879</link><description>You're making a great point.  I hope companies start to understand this.  As an example of the difficulty they have getting it, I vaguely remember what an Adobe exec said some time ago.  They felt like they didn't profit enough from the open PostScript language they developed.  The quote was something like "We won't make the same mistake with PDF that we made with PostScript" referring to openness.  Of course, if PostScript hadn't been open, it wouldn't have been so widely adopted as a standard.  Then Adobe wouldn't even have been in a position to decide how to profit from PDF.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If even the companies who succeed based on this principle don't understand it, what hope is there for companies like Facebook?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 12:59:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A small note regarding Facebook Connect</title><link>http://blog.disqus.net/2009/03/09/a-small-note-regarding-facebook-connect/#comment-9240924</link><description>I set up Facebook Connect and did a test comment here: &lt;a href="http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-03-07" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-03-07&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It didn't take away the name/email/website boxes and wouldn't let me leave them blank.  Is that the way it's supposed to be?  I thought Facebook Connect replaced filling in that info.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:48:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don't Be Evil, The Business Model</title><link>http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-04-01#comment-8796638</link><description>People thought this was an April Fools joke.  It wasn't.  It's live now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:51:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Moved my 41400 Comments into Disqus</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/moved-my-41400-comments-into-disqus/#comment-8584424</link><description>You won't regret it.  Disqus is great.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:43:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>