<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for brlewis</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/brlewis/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:38:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Backtype takes you where the pain is</title><link>http://ourdoings-startup.disqus.com/backtype_takes_you_where_the_pain_is/#comment-21849105</link><description>You're welcome.  Backtype is definitely useful.  I use it daily.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:38:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Use Modern Web Sites: Do The Dumb Thing</title><link>http://ourdoings-startup.disqus.com/how_to_use_modern_web_sites_do_the_dumb_thing/#comment-21196766</link><description>There's a tradeoff to be made between transparency and simplicity.  I'm thinking about an advanced settings page and/or a wiki.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:04:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foliage Trip 2: Mount Morgan</title><link>http://brlewis.disqus.com/foliage_trip_2_mount_morgan/#comment-20787432</link><description>The GF1 looks awfully expensive.  When I have that kind of money for camera equipment, I'll probably buy a decent automatic lens for my DSLR.  (My good lenses are all manual.)  Even the LX3 is probably more pricey than we're looking for.  Most of our low-light/motion shots are kids in the house where the DSLR is hand, so the point+shoot can be cheap.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:58:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stop Abusing Robert Scoble for a Week</title><link>http://ourdoings-startup.disqus.com/stop_abusing_robert_scoble_for_a_week/#comment-20787303</link><description>In that case it makes sense for you to do the interview.  You'll get growth information straight from the source, and know where to go from there.  I bet he won't speculate about future growth, not even near-term, since that's not his style.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. Don't thank me too much for this post.  I'm already planning abuse for next week.  :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:55:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which iPhone app is better, Dropbox or Pixelpipe?</title><link>http://ourdoings-startup.disqus.com/which_iphone_app_is_better_dropbox_or_pixelpipe/#comment-19254533</link><description>Just to make sure, I removed the ourdoings pipe, created a new pipe url in ourdoings and then added back in pixelpipe; same behaviour.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pgpd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:25:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which iPhone app is better, Dropbox or Pixelpipe?</title><link>http://ourdoings-startup.disqus.com/which_iphone_app_is_better_dropbox_or_pixelpipe/#comment-19252737</link><description>Pixelpipe sent empty values to OurDoings:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;((media . "") (title . "") (message . ""))&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like it better when it's my bug, because then I can fix it.  But in this case it appears to be a Pixelpipe bug.  I'll report it to them.  I'll also give feedback to Dropbox about handling the bunch-of-photos use case better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:10:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which iPhone app is better, Dropbox or Pixelpipe?</title><link>http://ourdoings-startup.disqus.com/which_iphone_app_is_better_dropbox_or_pixelpipe/#comment-19246927</link><description>Sounds like Pixelpipe beats Dropbox for this use.  I'll investigate what happened with the test Pixelpipe upload and get back to you by email.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:50:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inside the mind of a nervous friendfeed user</title><link>http://ourdoings-startup.disqus.com/inside_the_mind_of_a_nervous_friendfeed_user/#comment-14772365</link><description>Silly, isn't it?  But what's really going on inside our minds when we worry about the acquisition?  If the acquisition is bad, either the FriendFeed founders dissed us, or they made a mistake.  And for them to make a mistake, they'd need something akin to brainwashing.  That's what we're really thinking, isn't it?  Silly or not, I think a detailed response from the founders on the "brainwashing" question is what would really help reassure us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:50:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inside the mind of a nervous friendfeed user</title><link>http://ourdoings-startup.disqus.com/inside_the_mind_of_a_nervous_friendfeed_user/#comment-14694878</link><description>That's helpful to know.  I tend to think I'm representative of others, but it isn't always true.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:39:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Five Tasks in the Morning</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/five_tasks_in_the_morning/#comment-12707832</link><description>Yes Chris - I'd love to see you while I'm up here some time!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jessestay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:07:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Five Tasks in the Morning</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/five_tasks_in_the_morning/#comment-12705276</link><description>Chris, if you like dipping into FriendFeed, why not drop in on our FriendFeed meetup 5-6:45pm today at the Cambridgeside Galleria before webinno?  Jesse Stay of SocialToo is visiting from out of town.  &lt;a href="http://friendfeed.com/massachusetts/b50998cf/boston-friendfeed-meetup-wednesday-july-15-5-p-m" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://friendfeed.com/massachusetts/b50998cf/bo...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:05:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TwitSnaps jumps into competitive Twitter photo sharing space</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/twitsnaps_jumps_into_competitive_twitter_photo_sharing_space/#comment-11999170</link><description>I didn't think of Posterous. Interesting that in searches on Google for Twitter image sharing and Tweet picture and stuff like that it didn't come up, so they need to work a bit on their Google ranking.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:46:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TwitSnaps jumps into competitive Twitter photo sharing space</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/twitsnaps_jumps_into_competitive_twitter_photo_sharing_space/#comment-11995397</link><description>Robert, where's Posterous in your list?  Posterous is going after twitpic with a vengeance.  They're in all the major Twitter clients now.  OurDoings isn't really shooting for twitter, much more for FriendFeed: &lt;a href="http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-05-27" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://ourdoings.com/ourdoings-startup/2009-05-27&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:57:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: API worlds are quite wondrous indeed</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/api_worlds_are_quite_wondrous_indeed/#comment-11950853</link><description>I've got a really cool API example, but can't talk about it yet.  Give me a few hours.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:17:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real-time systems hurting long-term knowledge?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/real_time_systems_hurting_long_term_knowledge/#comment-11886005</link><description>OK, cool. I wasn't singling out Ourdoings, for instance. It looks great. I was just trying to make a general point to Robert that blogs maybe have changed and morphed, but remain a centralized hub of one's net identity. Actually, services like yours only help blogs by giving them more reach and connectivity with interesting products like yours. :-) I just thought a couple days ago he felt that blogs didn't matter anymore and to hinge everything one is doing kind of out there on the branches, when I felt the main trunk was still key. Just a philosophical thought. Thanks for your info though!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StephenPickering</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:55:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real-time systems hurting long-term knowledge?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/real_time_systems_hurting_long_term_knowledge/#comment-11879732</link><description>OurDoings won't go out of business because it hasn't gone into business yet.  I developed it and continue to build it as a side project.  Also, the comments live on FriendFeed and Disqus, just like on this blog.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:52:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The question is wrong</title><link>http://paulbuchheit.disqus.com/the_question_is_wrong/#comment-11570996</link><description>Not to mention the person said they HAD two children which is clearly past tense but they also said one of them IS a girl so one of the poor person's children is dead but we have no idea of the sex and it would be insensitive to ask so I don't think we'll ever know!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pickle Pumpers</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:11:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed: A level playing field for the real-time web</title><link>http://ourdoings-startup.disqus.com/friendfeed_a_level_playing_field_for_the_real_time_web/#comment-10669686</link><description>A general explanation of SUP is at &lt;a href="http://blog.friendfeed.com/2008/08/simple-update-protocol-fetch-updates.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://blog.friendfeed.com/2008/08/simple-updat...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A general explanation of XMPP: &lt;a href="http://xmpp.org/tech/core.shtml" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://xmpp.org/tech/core.shtml&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:05:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Backups</title><link>http://ourdoings-startup.disqus.com/backups/#comment-10561866</link><description>Right.  I pass it through as an argument to the script (see the "$@" in the last line).  Initially I wanted to use the script more cautiously.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 08:38:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Backups</title><link>http://ourdoings-startup.disqus.com/backups/#comment-10561791</link><description>Glad I could help.. just one more thing (you probably know this but I'll mention it anyway). Rsync does not delete any thing on the remote side unless you give the --delete option. I noticed you were not using it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pgpd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 08:33:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Backups</title><link>http://ourdoings-startup.disqus.com/backups/#comment-10561721</link><description>Thanks, that's really helpful.  So what I'll need eventually is an EC2 instance that can be the remote end of the rsync.  It would only need to be up for the duration of the backup, so it wouldn't have to cost a lot.  What I'll likely do medium-term is do this rsync once a week, and have the daily backup simply copy new files (via tar), so it won't have to navigate the whole remote filesystem to find things to delete.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 08:28:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Should You Do Everything As If It Matters?</title><link>http://sheenonline.disqus.com/why_should_you_do_everything_as_if_it_matters/#comment-10364484</link><description>Awesome post, Rah!  Even the things you love will involve work you don't want to do.  Developing a winning attitude will surely pay off.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:01:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flavio Piccioni, Robert Scoble, and Pavan Gunupudi, this is for you</title><link>http://ourdoings-startup.disqus.com/flavio_piccioni_robert_scoble_and_pavan_gunupudi_this_is_for_you/#comment-10157681</link><description>Absolutely true. Excellent advice; particularly on Friendfeed. It's an&lt;br&gt;excellent vehicle for me in learning what I need to know today. Keep up the&lt;br&gt;good work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alexwilliams</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:28:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Be Naked</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/be_naked/#comment-10147932</link><description>Makes perfect sense. I've noticed that every time I stumble and acknowledge my fault, a new path opens up, and it in more cases than not leads to a better result.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also I think informal discussions have the potential to give a lot of insights that you may not get if you are too focussed on an outcome. I just haven't figured out a way to make it work for myself yet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pranavbhasin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 08:12:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flavio Piccioni, Robert Scoble, and Pavan Gunupudi, this is for you</title><link>http://ourdoings-startup.disqus.com/flavio_piccioni_robert_scoble_and_pavan_gunupudi_this_is_for_you/#comment-10147266</link><description>This was simply me taking Robert Scoble's advice.  He has a lot to say about how to grow a service.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're here because I took Chris Brogan's advice.  There's a lot of great advice out there if people will just listen and do it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brlewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 08:04:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>