<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for bryanlanders</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/bryanlanders/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:59:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Social Thinking...</title><link>http://socialthinking.disqus.com/social_thinking_10/#comment-17886031</link><description>hey! you found your shoutout. how'd you find this? just curious...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;yeah, i bookmarked your site for the next time i have some design/flash work to outsource to you ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i'm glad to share anything about the site. it's built on django (check it out if you're building web apps). i've just recently ditched the only part that originated on this site (the blog) and i'm using &lt;a href="http://posterous.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;posterous.com&lt;/a&gt; for that now. so everything you see here is from social media tools elsewhere on the interwebz...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;glad you got kate's hello :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanlanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:59:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music, Technology, Art, Economy</title><link>http://ethan.disqus.com/music_technology_art_economy_808/#comment-15458100</link><description>dude, digging Luke Wroblewski: &lt;a href="http://www.lukew.com/ff/entry.asp?877" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.lukew.com/ff/entry.asp?877&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I read this quote last week and realized it is symptomatic of a common assertion that in technology (and especially the Web) “completely open” is better than “controlled”.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;        “But we’ll all know exactly where Apple stands – jealously guarding control of their users [...] And that’s not what Apple should be about.” -TechCrunch&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry but Apple makes their entire living by tightly controlling the experience of their customers. It’s why everyone praises their designs. From top to bottom, hardware to software -you get an integrated experience. Without this control, Apple could not be what it is today. "&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Most people out there prefer a great experience over complete openness."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;via Chris Messina: &lt;a href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/08/26/losing-my-religion/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/08/26/losing-my...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;who also adds:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I will say this: I’m an advocate for open source and open standards because I believe that open ecosystems — i.e. those with low barriers to entry (low startup costs; low friction to launch; public infrastructure for sustaining productivity) — are essential for competition at the level of user experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It may seem paradoxical, but open systems in which secretive design processes are used can result in better solutions, overall.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thus when I talk about openness, I really mean openness from an economic/competitive perspective."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tdavidson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:31:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music, Technology, Art, Economy</title><link>http://ethan.disqus.com/music_technology_art_economy_808/#comment-14503029</link><description>wow, powerfully lame!!!  my response will be delivered on my behalf by&lt;br&gt;louis c.k.:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://vodpod.com/watch/1335606-louis-ck-everythings-amazing-nobodys-happy" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://vodpod.com/watch/1335606-louis-ck-everyt...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apple is supernormally profitable because they have achieved amazing&lt;br&gt;things that no one else had the balls or skill to do (iTunes; iPhone;&lt;br&gt;etc).  There's NO REASON for them to open up their platform until such&lt;br&gt;a time as it is the right economic move to make.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, that assumes that they will.  iTunes has been around the&lt;br&gt;longest and is the most ripe.  However, it's possible that their&lt;br&gt;contract with the labels precludes a real API.  Who knows.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Similarly, I made the point earlier that the iPhone pwnd ATT and that&lt;br&gt;they will absolutely put it on other carriers, when they get the deals&lt;br&gt;worked out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But seriously, the only question is: if you don't like it, why aren't&lt;br&gt;you using an alternative?  Oh yeah...because the alternatives SUCK&lt;br&gt;compared to Apple's stuff.  NOW I remember.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I left him a comment</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EthanBauley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 20:16:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music, Technology, Art, Economy</title><link>http://ethan.disqus.com/music_technology_art_economy_808/#comment-14502484</link><description>Looks like he posted that one on his blog, too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://calacanis.com/2009/08/08/the-case-against-apple-in-five-parts/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://calacanis.com/2009/08/08/the-case-agains...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanlanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 19:41:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music, Technology, Art, Economy</title><link>http://ethan.disqus.com/music_technology_art_economy_808/#comment-14502434</link><description>can you fwd me the calacanis thingy?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EthanBauley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 19:38:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music, Technology, Art, Economy</title><link>http://ethan.disqus.com/music_technology_art_economy_808/#comment-14502433</link><description>ya, 100% agree&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;they have leverage because they have the hottest platform by a&lt;br&gt;wiiiiiiiiide margin, end of story&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i suspect this will be very hot tho:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://code.verizon.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;code.verizon.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EthanBauley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 19:38:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music, Technology, Art, Economy</title><link>http://ethan.disqus.com/music_technology_art_economy_808/#comment-14501418</link><description>Man, this thread got very informative. Nice links and analysis,  &lt;br&gt;Ethan!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only other thing I'll add is to mention this growing feeling that  &lt;br&gt;buying or developing for the sexy iThingy du jour is done in spite of  &lt;br&gt;those actions signaling you are supporting or opting into a closed,  &lt;br&gt;some argue monopolistic system. The sentiment seems to be, "if I could find other products (or app platforms) that look and work as well, I would choose not to buy Apple and instead support an open alternative...but..."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Incidentally, while I was typing this comment, Calacanis' latest mailing list rant entitled "The Case Against Apple--in Five Parts" popped up in my inbox!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanlanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 18:39:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music, Technology, Art, Economy</title><link>http://ethan.disqus.com/music_technology_art_economy_808/#comment-14002287</link><description>addendum: aapl's discipline ("obsession with secrecy") amazes me.&lt;br&gt;this article is great, but i'm sure there's quite a bit more to it:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/23/technology/23apple.html?_r=2" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/23/technology/23...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;clearly they invest a ton in these elaborate schemes.  does it pay&lt;br&gt;off?  seems like it does to me.  is it sustainable?  probably, for a&lt;br&gt;while.  the CIA does a pretty good job, and the total US gov't&lt;br&gt;intelligence budget, of which the CIA is just a part, is allegedly&lt;br&gt;only $26B in 1998 dollars.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EthanBauley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:58:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music, Technology, Art, Economy</title><link>http://ethan.disqus.com/music_technology_art_economy_808/#comment-13999518</link><description>ya the aapl blowback intrigues me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;frankly i don't think it's material, for a variety of reasons, but&lt;br&gt;principally because their hardware is discontinuously better than the&lt;br&gt;competition's.  as long as they don't re-sign with at&amp;t (which they&lt;br&gt;won't), they will have killed off the carriers with the iphone and&lt;br&gt;they're only going to get more powerful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the "competition" with other handset makers is a sideshow, b/c it's&lt;br&gt;all about the carriers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;is apple's mgmt of their developer community concerning?  hugely.  esp&lt;br&gt;these kinds of moves:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/08/03/apple-bans-app-stores-3rd-most-prolific-developer/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/08/03/apple-ba...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;now, i don't want to say "community mgmt isn't in apple's dna" but it&lt;br&gt;sure seems like it.  bryan you can probably weigh in on this, but it's&lt;br&gt;tough to reconcile rampant fanboyism with some annoyance and have it&lt;br&gt;net out as a catastrophic for aapl. the dev confs always seem like&lt;br&gt;pure nirvana for devs.  so lots going on there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(i.e. a move from 99% positive sentiment to 98% is a "doubling of&lt;br&gt;negative sentiment"...but it's still 98% positive.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;no question that they get the economics of an open platform.  itunes,&lt;br&gt;app store, os x are all open platforms...not relative to linux, for&lt;br&gt;example, but *massively* open relative to ATT circa 2005.  or tower&lt;br&gt;records circa 2001.  they have moved the software platform/network&lt;br&gt;ethos laterally into other vertical markets, which is what is&lt;br&gt;disruptive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;anyways it seems like a browser that connects with the hardware api's&lt;br&gt;isn't that big of a stretch.  if that happens, then they won't have to&lt;br&gt;manage anything.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;sorry for all the disconnected thoughts...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;tac anderson had an interesting post the other day re: aapl comm's strategy:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newcommbiz.com/will-apple-finally-have-to-embrace-social-media/#disqus_thread" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.newcommbiz.com/will-apple-finally-ha...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;he made the point earlier that if you make incredible products + cust&lt;br&gt;svc, no one cares about anything else (which i agree with).  also made&lt;br&gt;some points about the "mainstream" distrusting large scale orgs.  he&lt;br&gt;advocates for their participation in soc media.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;my first point on that is that you don't have to participate in sm at&lt;br&gt;all to be transparent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;frankly i could argue either way, but all i can say is to repeat:&lt;br&gt;their execution of product + svc + retail is SO RIDICULOUSLY GOOD that&lt;br&gt;none of that other stuff matters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;to that point i think aapl leverages soc media BY FAR the best of any&lt;br&gt;company out there.  they invest exactly zero in it: pure unadulterated&lt;br&gt;WOM, at scale.  as the surfers say: "sick, brah."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;tac says "consumers don't trust size" but i think that conflates&lt;br&gt;"size" and "evil".  they're highly correlated, but size doesn't cause&lt;br&gt;distrust.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;it may very well be tac's point that "we don't really know, because&lt;br&gt;they're not being transparent", which is a great angle.  goog instills&lt;br&gt;trust with their comms and their stated goals.  is aapl's user&lt;br&gt;friendliness + advertising an elaborate facade, masking evil ?  i&lt;br&gt;don't know.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;evil is in the dna:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bubblegeneration.com/2007/11/research-note-facebooks-evil-is-in-dna.cfm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.bubblegeneration.com/2007/11/researc...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EthanBauley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:17:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music, Technology, Art, Economy</title><link>http://ethan.disqus.com/music_technology_art_economy_808/#comment-13968672</link><description>It makes sense for AT&amp;T, but does it make sense for developers and users? I'm not sure everyone's on board with trusting that Apple will ever be good at anything resembling and open system. I should mention that while on the treadmill today, I listened to the latest TWiT podcast, which featured a lot of Apple hating.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanlanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 04:06:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music, Technology, Art, Economy</title><link>http://ethan.disqus.com/music_technology_art_economy_413/#comment-12988476</link><description>Don't assume that every call have an ad, or the ads would necessarily be played at the beginning, or that it's even meant for consumers; granted, mobile operators' prior tests of advert-supported calling (granting free minutes if users accept mobile advertising) have been pretty unsuccessful, I would argue that the execution has been pretty poor.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;example of a test (from 2006): &lt;a href="http://mobilitytoday.com/news/006530/free_calls_ads" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://mobilitytoday.com/news/006530/free_calls...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tdavidson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:54:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music, Technology, Art, Economy</title><link>http://ethan.disqus.com/music_technology_art_economy_413/#comment-12988143</link><description>Worst idea ever. When I make phone calls, I spend that time preparing my thoughts and emotions for the communication that's about to happen. Imagine a being bombarded with ads before a job interview or announcing the death of a family member. There are some times when distractions are unwelcome, and for me, this proposed ad time one of those.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just got my Google Voice account and I'm really looking forward to playing with the features. I hope this one gets booed off the stage.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanlanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:35:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Day 1 @ Mark O&amp;#8217;Connor&amp;#8217;s Fiddle Camp</title><link>http://caseydriessen.disqus.com/day_1_mark_o8217connor8217s_fiddle_camp/#comment-11633296</link><description>@caseydriessen blogs fiddle camp! truly a man of our time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanlanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:20:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m looking for a challenge (and here&amp;#8217;s how you can help).</title><link>http://taylordavidson.disqus.com/i8217m_looking_for_a_challenge_and_here8217s_how_you_can_help/#comment-10534899</link><description>Very brave and proactive!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To others reading this: this is a huge opportunity to work with an intelligent, prolific content creator who has fully qualified credentials in the financial space as well as numerous other talents. Take him up on this offer!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanlanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:26:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://bryanlanders.com/thoughts/2009/may/21/lesson-in-defraggregation-deru/</title><link>http://socialthinking.disqus.com/thread_95/#comment-9780490</link><description>Thanks, Nate! It's a wild ux. Kind of like purposefully overgrowing your lawn.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanlanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 23:34:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Casey Driessen&amp;#8217;s Full Spectrum Music Giveaway</title><link>http://caseydriessen.disqus.com/casey_driessen8217s_full_spectrum_music_giveaway/#comment-9191282</link><description>Great idea! Drooling over the prizes :P</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanlanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 19:22:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://bryanlanders.com/thoughts/2009/mar/2/free-prius-parking-la-ends/</title><link>http://socialthinking.disqus.com/thread_300/#comment-8285876</link><description>Nice. Hadn't seen holamun2. Looks cool. What did you do there?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Walking to meetup somewhere with friends is something I think I'm looking for in "home", which makes me think I won't be in LA forever. If only I could draw kickass, moody illustrations like you to express myself :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanlanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:20:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://bryanlanders.com/thoughts/2009/mar/2/free-prius-parking-la-ends/</title><link>http://socialthinking.disqus.com/thread_300/#comment-8282828</link><description>I'm jealous! Riding a bike + bus here as the only means of transportation seems far too scary/unfun. I've come to the realization that the hour + long drive to get anywhere in this city is the root cause of people's lack of initiative to get together.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Question for you: do you miss anything about LA?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanlanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:38:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Thinking...</title><link>http://socialthinking.disqus.com/social_thinking_138/#comment-8117834</link><description>Hadn't seen &lt;a href="http://simplifythis.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;simplifythis.com&lt;/a&gt;, so thanks for the mention. My needs are fairly simple, but I have a lot of clients (lots of one-time as well as recurring invoices), so I quickly get into higher price plans. Your prices look good. I'll check it out...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanlanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:29:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This is SO ten months ago...</title><link>http://ethan.disqus.com/this_is_so_ten_months_ago/#comment-7533311</link><description>oh, i've been quite patient over the last couple years ;-)  reading&lt;br&gt;frommer's comment just made me think of my own thing, that's all.  i&lt;br&gt;like my comment...which is obviously a total hagel/haque ripoff</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EthanBauley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:12:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This is SO ten months ago...</title><link>http://ethan.disqus.com/this_is_so_ten_months_ago/#comment-7532190</link><description>Sure. Seems to me, the deeper your knowledge gets, the more you'll have to grin and bear the chatter around topics like this...caffeine or no caffeine... ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanlanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:30:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This is SO ten months ago...</title><link>http://ethan.disqus.com/this_is_so_ten_months_ago/#comment-7528024</link><description>ya i don't know what it is but i feel more impatient lately&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;possibly it's because i'm traveling a lot and drinking a cappuccino&lt;br&gt;every morning, which i NEVER do...very sensitive to caffeine</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EthanBauley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:01:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This is SO ten months ago...</title><link>http://ethan.disqus.com/this_is_so_ten_months_ago/#comment-7519063</link><description>I'm liking this new edgy tone...feels appropriate here. Dumb pipes shall inherit the web!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanlanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:31:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://bryanlanders.com/thoughts/2009/feb/7/social-media-vs-gtd/</title><link>http://socialthinking.disqus.com/thread_89/#comment-7430095</link><description>Update - from Mr. GTD himself: &lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/managing/content/mar2009/ca20090310_589525.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.businessweek.com/managing/content/ma...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanlanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 03:41:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://bryanlanders.com/thoughts/2009/mar/2/free-prius-parking-la-ends/</title><link>http://socialthinking.disqus.com/thread_300/#comment-7115819</link><description>Hello, The DMV! Thanks for your comment. Sure, as I said, it was wonderful while the incentive lasted. That's a really interesting point you've raised though. One could say that incentives and regulations are two ways of encouraging vehicles with better gas mileage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do wonder, however, what the psychological effect of one vs the other has on people. Do they react better to positive tactics like incentives or negative tactics (no matter how necessary and valid) like regulations? For me, one was a gift, and the other is a chore.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a DMV representative, can you offer and info on parking in Santa Monica? Is metered parking still free for Prius owners there?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bryanlanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:00:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>