<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for btocher</title><link>https://disqus.com/by/btocher/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://disqus.com/btocher/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:36:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Origin of the phrase “Roger that” in English</title><link>https://jakubmarian.com/origin-of-the-phrase-roger-that-in-english/#comment-2904884476</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It still did here in the UK into the 1980s, though I haven't heard it used since back then.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:36:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ModeAudio Giveaway: Win 1 of 3 sound packs of your choice</title><link>http://rekkerd.org/modeaudio-giveaway-win-1-of-3-sound-packs-of-your-choice/#comment-2698265524</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice! Pour Ambient Sounds looks interesting :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 09:39:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows startup sounds transformed into amazing ambient music</title><link>http://cdm.link/2015/08/windows-startup-sounds-transformed-amazing-ambient-music/#comment-2239124859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Brian Eno is best known among the startup sound composers, for his contribution to Windows 95" is the correct quote.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2015 11:42:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Win a FREE Ableton Live course from I Make Jams!</title><link>http://www.ableton-live-expert.com/articles/win-a-free-ableton-live-course-from-i-make-jams/#comment-2156477821</link><description>&lt;p&gt;(B) Simpler&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2015 12:30:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Love Spotify and Think You Should Too</title><link>http://pansentient.com/2014/07/why-i-love-spotify-and-think-you-should-too/#comment-1470839288</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice post. A wee correction, though - Radiohead are on Spotify. It's Yorke's newer stuff that's been pulled.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 12:28:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Use Spotify Outside UK and US</title><link>http://www.guidingtech.com/14094/use-spotify-outside-us-uk/#comment-1051932780</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's an odd presumption. I have nearly 56Gb of legally freely downloaded music from netlabels alone here, excluding music I've paid for.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:06:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Strangest Driving Laws On Earth [infographic]</title><link>http://dailyinfographic.com/the-strangest-driving-laws-on-earth-infographic#comment-1046485579</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Hackney cabs one appears to be fiction: &lt;a href="http://www.morrlaw.com/news/uk-s-strangest-laws-fact-or-fiction" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.morrlaw.com/news/uk-s-strangest-laws-fact-or-fiction"&gt;http://www.morrlaw.com/news...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 07:52:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Photo App Giveaway: Monokrom</title><link>http://lifeinlofi.com/2013/09/07/photo-app-giveaway-monokrom/#comment-1034127336</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really like the look of this app, and need to do some stuff in black and white.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2013 06:17:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Still Have KitCam? All Premium Packs are Now Free! UPDATE</title><link>http://lifeinlofi.com/2013/08/02/still-have-kitcam-all-premium-packs-are-now-free/#comment-991738994</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks - got all three packs free a few minutes ago from the UK App Store.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 14:11:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How a squirrel sent a journalist around the world to uncover the Internet’s physical infrastructure</title><link>http://thenextweb.com/video/2013/04/25/andrew-blum-talks-about-how-he-discovered-the-physical-infrastructure-behind-the-internet-video/#comment-875342886</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm getting an error message on the second video: "This video is private".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:50:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Reasons I Picked Feedly to Replace Google Reader</title><link>https://michaelhyatt.com/feedly-to-replace-google-reader.html#comment-830405841</link><description>&lt;p&gt;feedly can add any blog if it has an RSS feed. If your blog has one, anyone can add it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:04:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Instagram, Pinterest, Aviary: The Social Photo Feud Heats Up</title><link>http://www.entrepreneur.com/blog/225293#comment-743025875</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The phrase "making it impossible to embed Instagram photos in tweets" is incorrect. Users can continue to embed Instagram links, just like any others. The ability of Instagram photos to be shown as Twitter Cards has been removed *on the &lt;a href="http://twitter.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="twitter.com"&gt;twitter.com&lt;/a&gt; website*, but not everywhere else. And even for those that insist on using &lt;a href="http://twitter.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="twitter.com"&gt;twitter.com&lt;/a&gt;, there are ways to replace this functionality. For example, on the Chrome browser, the InstaTwit addon brings the the Cards back in a heartbeat: &lt;a href="https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/instatwit/hhalcamddihdpdgdjkjbgikgobnbbpif" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/instatwit/hhalcamddihdpdgdjkjbgikgobnbbpif"&gt;https://chrome.google.com/w...&lt;/a&gt; There may be others - I haven't checked. But this one works just fine here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:26:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hope: In Piano Gestures and Glitches, a Gorgeous Free Compilation from Japan</title><link>/2012/11/hope-in-piano-gestures-and-glitches-a-gorgeous-free-compilation-from-japan/#comment-722791017</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gorgeous, moving, and perfect. Thanks for sharing this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:09:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Play YouTube Videos and Playlists in VLC Media Player</title><link>http://www.labnol.org/software/youtube-videos-in-vlc-player/26829/#comment-720411909</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This works well, thanks. Do you know if there's any way to get the VLC player to automatically show YouTube videos in their highest available resolution?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:25:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The cookie law is dead, you’re welcome</title><link>http://blog.silktide.com/2012/09/the-cookie-law-is-dead-youre-welcome/#comment-646615726</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm really confused about what you're saying you've achieved here. The shift to "implied consent" hours before the law came into force meant that the ICO wouldn't take any action. And... they're not taking any action. Am I missing the point somehow?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:04:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Facebook Next for the Twitter Service Chop?</title><link>http://www.thesocialpenguinblog.com/2012/08/02/is-facebook-next-for-the-twitter-service-chop/#comment-607686778</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with what you say - the two networks are very different, and should normally be kept separate, But I wonder how Twitter will be able to prevent the Selective Tweets app on Facebook from reading a user's Twitter output and posting it, when nominated, to FB. It does have value in making the user consider tweets carefully before crossposting them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:30:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook&amp;#8217;s Silent Email Switch</title><link>http://yarddigital.com/facebooks-silent-email-switch/#comment-568821926</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It did change my primary address to the Facebook one, and I wasn't happy about that at all. It's not as if @facebook.com is really email, but even if it were, I'd still have been angry.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 07:39:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome to the new bitly!</title><link>http://blog.bitly.com/post/23998132587#comment-542044354</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can't you move it back, then?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 13:16:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.forthone.com/news/daffy-duck-says-no-second-question/</title><link>http://www.forthone.com/news/daffy-duck-says-no-second-question/#comment-526461643</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Childish behaviour like this from the Labour party will not endear them to potential voters.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 12:37:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Own an iPod? Then you're suing Apple </title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/10/tech/gaming-gadgets/apple-ipod-lawsuit/index.html#comment-525726551</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I commented because the headline is completely misleading.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 16:09:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Own an iPod? Then you're suing Apple </title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/10/tech/gaming-gadgets/apple-ipod-lawsuit/index.html#comment-525716922</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My MP3 files aren't blocked in any way. I'm happy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 15:57:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Own an iPod? Then you're suing Apple </title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/10/tech/gaming-gadgets/apple-ipod-lawsuit/index.html#comment-525716310</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I sure did read it. I don't live in the US, so it doesn't apply.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 15:56:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Own an iPod? Then you're suing Apple </title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/10/tech/gaming-gadgets/apple-ipod-lawsuit/index.html#comment-525714430</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you have to use iTunes for that? You don't on Windows, though I can't vouch for Macs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 15:54:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Own an iPod? Then you're suing Apple </title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/10/tech/gaming-gadgets/apple-ipod-lawsuit/index.html#comment-525705583</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't understand your comment. I use an iPod, and I don't use iTunes, to put the music that I bought from eMusic, onto it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 15:42:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Own an iPod? Then you're suing Apple </title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/10/tech/gaming-gadgets/apple-ipod-lawsuit/index.html#comment-525699064</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm suing Apple? "All persons or entities in the United States..." Hmm. I'm *not* suing Apple. [EDIT: To clarify: I don't live in the USA, so I'm legally outside the conditions of the suit. And I can't buy from the iTunes USA store anyhow, so even if I was eligible (which I'm not), a $5 coupon isn't worth the electrons it's printed on...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Baxter Tocher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 15:33:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>