<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of btocher</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/btocher/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:46:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hedge Fund Resume Writing Tips</title><link>http://hedgefundjoblist.com/blog/job-tips/write-effective-hedge-fund-resume/#comment-8879482</link><description>Glad you liked it, Michael!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:46:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Someone isn't happy about Obama making nice with Hillary</title><link>http://www.americablog.com/2008/11/someone-isnt-happy-about-obama-making.html#comment-3901869</link><description>Then I guess that's what's wrong with politics...when lies, manipulation, and fearmongering are "just politics", we are on a poor road. We should demand a higher ethics from our leaders than ourselves because of the power they wield, not a lesser one. I wouldn't hire someone I knew was a liar and manipulator who will drop any pretense of ethics when it suits their agenda to sweep my floor, much less help govern a nation. Why are our ethical demands of our leaders less than those of average people?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:36:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter is the new weblog | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/11/15/the-easiest-blog-to-maintain-ever/#comment-3789449</link><description>Oh, of course, and I do get involved in the community, I am a chatter, not just a microblogger. I use it for both. But I understand the people who just use it like a blog, without the chatting and back-and-forth. I'm just not one of them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 09:03:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You are not a personal brand – you are a character | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/11/10/you-are-not-a-personal-brand-%e2%80%93-you-are-a-character/#comment-3661549</link><description>It has been my name since I was 18...and I am a huge nerd. :p</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:58:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You are not a personal brand – you are a character | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/11/10/you-are-not-a-personal-brand-%e2%80%93-you-are-a-character/#comment-3661489</link><description>Yup, he was a member of Alpha Flight, Canada's answer to the X-Men. I prefer the version from Gargoyles, voiced by Brent Spiner. The Puck was also a character in Neil Gaiman's Sandman series. I have some great namesakes :p</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:46:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do you think blogging is dying? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/11/08/do-you-think-blogging-is-dying/#comment-3627429</link><description>Well, yeah, I mean how can individual bloggers create content at the rate HuffPo or Techcrunch do? Other than Chris Pirillo, of course, who could make a new internet just with what he produces. And the ads and affiliates are getting out of hand, IMO. I took ads of off all my sites except for the Social Media Philosophy Project, because that needs to somehow pay for itself. I am also not accepting approaches from advertisers, because it just got spammy. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I think individuals are able to build a different kind of following as well...people read HuffPo, but A-listers like Scoble or Darren have influence in a way that the big newspaper-style blogs don't. At least IMO they do. HuffPo I may or may not agree with or be interested in depending on the writer, but I am almost always interested in what Graywolf has to say.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:08:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zemanta</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/09/zemanta.html#comment-2379060</link><description>I have been using Zemanta at the Social Media Philosophy Project for awhile. Timelady and I, who primarily run the site, both like it a great deal. We replaced Tagaroo with it, which while it gets more pics, does not really do anything else as well. I also hung out with the community manager while I was at Wordcamp, and he was very helpful. Overall, it seems like a definite winner in the long term. I think the main competition, OpenCalais (Tagaroo) is too all over the place to provide any one thing well enough. (just my opinion as of right now, OpenCalais folks, no offense).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thePuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:02:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>