<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for cgerrish</title><link>https://disqus.com/by/cgerrish/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://disqus.com/cgerrish/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:11:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Phil Windley's Technometria</title><link>http://www.windley.com/archives/2012/12/when_services_die.shtml#comment-732540154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd suggest printing them all out and putting them in a shoebox. It's a technique that's stood the test of time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:11:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Domination Isn't Inevitable—It's Not Even Likely </title><link>http://www.windley.com/archives/2012/05/facebook_domination_isnt_inevitableits_not_even_likely.shtml#comment-534639035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Decentralization on a network can also look like a power law curve with some large nodes benefitting from preferential attachment (The rich get richer through the Network effect). Everyone is on Facebook, because everyone is on Facebook. The opposing force is articulated by Yogi Berra: "nobody goes there any more, it's too crowded."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A centralized network would mean that the vendor *is* the network. AOL functioned in this way-- there is no outside. The Web provided an "outside" to AOL. There's already an outside to Facebook, but not an outside that provides equivalent switchboard power. So in that sense, Facebook already operates within a decentralized Network and makes use of its protocols.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Scripting the barter between silos on a network may well create a higher level experience that emerges as a personal cloud. +1 level of indirection...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:02:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Checking for a Pulse</title><link>http://www.bittermancircle.com/?p=1412#comment-372256285</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Aron, have you listened to Wolves in the Throne Room? They're a variant of black metal created by some former Earth First dudes. I'm enjoying their latest...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:13:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Time of Pattern Recognition</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=4168#comment-298173111</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's an interesting question, once a public gesture is recorded and patterned, can a person recall the data? Can one pre-recall the data? In essence it's anonymity, invisibility in public. Baudelaire is eloquent on the advent of urban anonymity, it wasn't alway something we enjoyed. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:44:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Politics of the Message and the File</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=4162#comment-293749425</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Once the individual platforms have sufficient scale to create positive economics, there's little motivation to federate with other platforms. Email seemed to mimic the telephone network, the new platforms look back to AOL, the bulletin board on steroids. It may require an architectural innovation like a P2P messaging network to create change. P2P originally rode on the back of the MP3 and popular music to establish network scale. Since that time, the central platforms have managed to blacken the name of the P2P architectural form.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:55:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Ring Cycle For The Anthropocene</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=4020#comment-245232948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the kind words. I'm very familiar with Anna Russell, she's a good antidote when things get too stuffy in Wagner-world. Summarizing the Ring is a bit like Monty Python's 'summarize Proust' bit. And while I'm a big proponent of taking large-scale art seriously, part of that has to be seeing the humor in it. Even the humor in taking it seriously. Cheers. cmg&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:42:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sleepers Awake: Grains of Sand</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3958#comment-224608171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unequivocal but not serious. We feel uncomfortable at the margins, so we make jokes. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 01:54:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sleepers Awake: Grains of Sand</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3958#comment-224597000</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The form of exploration consisting of a question that has a true or false answer has an oddly narrow range.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 01:28:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sleepers Awake: Grains of Sand</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3958#comment-224585109</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting that Wolfram weighs in on metaphysical questions. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:52:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Contra Optimization: 4th Time Around</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3879#comment-201270170</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Duplication that isn't duplication, a net for catching errors, listening for signal in the noise. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 01:31:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screen and Cloud: Wrong Way Round</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3819#comment-184211149</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kurtz's last words in 'Heart of Darkness' or 'Apocalypse Now' -- "the horror, the horror." It's always on, whether the power switch is on or not. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:56:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A World of Infinite Info: Flattening the Curvature of the Earth</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3588#comment-132926431</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The road back from the infinite to the finite involves creating some limitations. I've described it as drawing a new horizon line. But another way to describe it would be the drawing of circles, and how my circle connects to and harvests the resonances and differences of your circle.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We also describe these kinds of limitations as lists and portfolios. In the curation model, we seek to hire portfolio managers to find the most productive set of people to follow.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Notice in this model, it's not pages or feeds from pages that are being followed but people.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 11:14:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A World of Infinite Info: Flattening the Curvature of the Earth</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3588#comment-130093921</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Crowd-based 'intelligence' may simply cause conforming views -- generally, what's popular is not what's most interesting. Track no longer exists in a real-time form -- and this gets to the point of whether or not an infinite tool is possible. Most of the tools out there draw horizon lines, they create a finite set to process. This is done through keyword, identity, affinity group, etc. Ev seems to suggest there's a possibility of a tool that can draw a circle around infinity. That's where the question begins to become interesting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:35:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PLATO: The Seed Of The Social Computing Fabric</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=2416#comment-121782402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hope you were able to attend the PLATO rewind at the Computer History Museum. They played all the hits.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 09:26:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PDX Principles</title><link>http://www.windley.com/archives/2010/09/pdx_principles.shtml#comment-77588184</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your comparison to the liquidity and portability of cash needs more context. While cash is liquid and portable, not all investments are. Bonds, commodities, equities, private investments -- these have varying degrees of liquidity and there can be a loss or gain on transfer from here to there. Identity assets are similar, they can be moved easily, or there's a cost to moving them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:35:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poindexter, Jonas and The Birth of Real-Time Dot Connecting</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3271#comment-75752594</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The interesting bit is that everyone has the same problem, it's cheap and easy to collect dots-- but it's expensive and hard to connect them. If the pattern holds, we should expect that technology to come from DARPA or In-Q-Tel rather than the Silicon Valley.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:43:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gluttony: Total Information Awareness, Personal Edition</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3231#comment-70953776</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll definitely take a look. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:41:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gluttony: Total Information Awareness, Personal Edition</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3231#comment-70655784</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems like contextual information is the *only* possible thing. It's how language works.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:05:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gluttony: Total Information Awareness, Personal Edition</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3231#comment-70655698</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd wait to see if you hear about these concepts from a few other people. The post itself is only a container for the ideas.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:04:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gluttony: Total Information Awareness, Personal Edition</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3231#comment-70655502</link><description>&lt;p&gt;HAMM:&lt;br&gt;I love the old questions.&lt;br&gt;(With fervour.)&lt;br&gt;Ah the old questions, the old answers, there's nothing like them!&lt;br&gt;(Pause.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.samuel-beckett.net/endgame.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.samuel-beckett.net/endgame.html"&gt;http://www.samuel-beckett.n...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:02:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Permanent Markers: Memory And Forgiveness</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3135#comment-64750326</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mutation is one of the ways language works. Lera Boroditsky has done some interesting work on how language shapes thought: &lt;a href="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/boroditsky09/boroditsky09_index.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/boroditsky09/boroditsky09_index.html"&gt;http://www.edge.org/3rd_cul...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:10:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Machines May Think&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3069#comment-62983208</link><description>&lt;p&gt;'Machines that think' or 'machines who think.' The difference in those two phrases encapsulates the problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:28:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Machines May Think&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3069#comment-62450432</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps we should call it 'intelligent design.'&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:51:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Machines May Think&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3069#comment-62420032</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd prefer to leave out the words "artificial" and "intelligence." Can't we just say that "better" is better than worse?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:57:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Banks, Walled Gardens And Metaphors of Place</title><link>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3044#comment-61944780</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Banks don't stop at national borders, although their regulation does. Financial instruments, excessive and otherwise, have an international circulation. But I'll grant you that American banks do have an excess of creativity.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:01:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>