<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for chrisrechtsteiner</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/chrisrechtsteiner/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:41:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: I want to divorce my iPhone (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/i_want_to_divorce_my_iphone_scripting_news/#comment-17233954</link><description>Android.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisrechtsteiner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:41:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fred Wilson Dot VC</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/fred_wilson_dot_vc_64706/#comment-15376680</link><description>i can carry them in one hand!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:58:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fred Wilson Dot VC</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/fred_wilson_dot_vc_64706/#comment-15372479</link><description>Do you have a sherpa on staff to carry all of that stuff for you? Wow.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisrechtsteiner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:45:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question&amp;#8230;Is Tweeting Your Trades Pumping Stocks?</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/question8230is_tweeting_your_trades_pumping_stocks/#comment-13527952</link><description>By this logic Bloomberg (with its proprietary messaging platform), AIM (b/c it's on every trader's desk), mobile phones (b/c, afterall, you can text more than on person at a time), blogs, etc. are all pumping stocks as they enable individuals trading stocks to reach out to multiple people with a single communication.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisrechtsteiner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:51:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sun Tzu - The Art of Community</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/sun_tzu_the_art_of_community/#comment-11844805</link><description>There are really two distinct SPAM issues as it relates to Twitter. The first is pretty simple - one-to-one relationships. If you don't follow people, they can't get to you.  Problem solved.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, when looking at a community like StockTwits, well, it's not that easy b/c people want the collective knowledge with and without following. Years (and years) ago, whenever we put into place self-service web apps the most important role was that of moderator. These individuals were tasked with keeping order and, quite frankly, tossing people out when they abused the system.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sadly, this seems to still be the best way to manage such situations ... at least until the algorithms can catch up to real-time threads &amp; their relation to other comments in the thread for relevance. That doesn't appear to be too close, at least from my vantage point.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisrechtsteiner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 22:41:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Good Morning Stocktwits TV</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/good_morning_stocktwits_tv/#comment-10986400</link><description>Good poiont</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:33:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Good Morning Stocktwits TV</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/good_morning_stocktwits_tv/#comment-10985203</link><description>Remember to occasionally focus on those losing. Sometimes the best education, insight and analysis results from the loss column.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisrechtsteiner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:15:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gametruck&amp;#8230;There is ALWAYS a Market for Great Ideas</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/gametruck8230there_is_always_a_market_for_great_ideas/#comment-9205178</link><description>My teenage boys tell me the reason that they prefer Xbox is because Xbox online is far better than any competitive service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m kagan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 10:31:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gametruck&amp;#8230;There is ALWAYS a Market for Great Ideas</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/gametruck8230there_is_always_a_market_for_great_ideas/#comment-9204070</link><description>They wouldn't survive without $MSFT.  The XBox division has lost billions of dollars.  Great console (except the hardware problems - my 360 has the dreaded ring of death), but a terrible business model, and especially so for premium gaming consoles in a deep recession.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why is NTDOY such a dog?  The same reason C is trading at 3.84 despite EPS of -5.51.  The market is bouncing from extremely oversold conditions, not rewarding companies in good financial position alongside an economic recovery.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Busigin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 09:52:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gametruck&amp;#8230;There is ALWAYS a Market for Great Ideas</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/gametruck8230there_is_always_a_market_for_great_ideas/#comment-9157193</link><description>It is. We have everything here - DS, DSi, PSP, PS2, Xbox 360, Wii ... and, without a doubt, the Xbox gets used the most. Not even close. DS &amp; DSI's get action when we are going out &amp; the boys take them in the car / restaurant / plane / etc. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's why I wish Xbox was its own company b/c they aren't enough of $MSFT to justify owning the stock right now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisrechtsteiner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 10:10:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gametruck&amp;#8230;There is ALWAYS a Market for Great Ideas</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/gametruck8230there_is_always_a_market_for_great_ideas/#comment-9157127</link><description>amazing the dichotomy between what you read and what you see and experience</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 10:06:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gametruck&amp;#8230;There is ALWAYS a Market for Great Ideas</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/gametruck8230there_is_always_a_market_for_great_ideas/#comment-9157061</link><description>The issue w/ the Xbox at that age is realism. The games are more real. The cars get dented (Grid, PGR), the jersey's blow in the wind (MLB) and the crowd screams (pick a game). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Wii / DS is a cartoon-style gaming experience. It is outstanding, don't get me wrong, but at this age they are always trying to be older, not younger, and the realism of the Xbox.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Xbox had a mobile platform, they could dominate ... but, alas, they haven't been able to figure that out yet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisrechtsteiner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 10:01:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stocktwits Launches a Premium Blog Network</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/stocktwits_launches_a_premium_blog_network/#comment-8421496</link><description>This is a brilliant idea ... one that will resonate deeply w/in a static, tired and boring industry - financial news.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can't wait to see StockTwits, the network, broadcasting 24x7 and finally putting a a stake into the heart of horrible financial TV.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisrechtsteiner</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:42:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StockTwits Updates</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/stocktwits_updates/#comment-8198989</link><description>Yep.  We are doing heavy blocking and tackling at the poiunt of entry</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:16:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: StockTwits Updates</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/stocktwits_updates/#comment-8198794</link><description>The precedent being set by Stocktwits re: SPAM and protection of a tweet stream is one of its greatest assets. A public pronouncement (really, continued public pronouncements) supporting the quality and integrity of the stream could be one of the best values added to the Twitter ecosystem ... if people are smart enough to pay attention.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisrechtsteiner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:08:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Marketing Bullshit Bingo &amp;raquo; raena.net</title><link>http://socialmarketingbullshitbingo.disqus.com/social_marketing_bullshit_bingo_raquo_raenanet/#comment-6626452</link><description>Outstanding. Simply outstanding. Bravo!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisrechtsteiner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:05:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deep Market Thoughts&amp;#8230;Could we Crash?</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/deep_market_thoughts8230could_we_crash/#comment-6473061</link><description>what else is the market *but* mood, a cross-section snapshop of the moment's collective psychology? ... at least among the minds of those in the game? ...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregorylent</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:33:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deep Market Thoughts&amp;#8230;Could we Crash?</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/deep_market_thoughts8230could_we_crash/#comment-6437292</link><description>There are ALWAYS debts to be paid that are settled in the most painful way possible. Nationalization or not? Totally agree a decision is better than being an armadillo. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does anyone have the stones to make those calls right now? That, for me, is the larger problem.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Decisive action is necessary b/c MOTR inaction is furthering and propagating instability that isn't necessary or warranted right now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisrechtsteiner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:15:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deep Market Thoughts&amp;#8230;Could we Crash?</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/deep_market_thoughts8230could_we_crash/#comment-6432727</link><description>Oh, they're working on supply and demand, all right.  What you've got to realize is that irrational, inconsistent, and just plain silly moods have ALWAYS been a part of the market.  ALWAYS.  Mood ALWAYS rules the day, and it's expressed through dollars in a bid/ask.  What we've got going on is wilder than most, but at heart it's not different.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indecision on the part of gubmint is poisoning a lot of the market.  Who gets saved?  Nationalized or not?  Moral arguments aside, an outright seizure and nationalization would be better for stabilizing the market than indecision has been.  So, too, would a clear-cut statement that NO nationalization would take place.  The only thing in the middle of the road is a yellow stripe and dead armadillos. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Banks are where they are, despite being valid ongoing businesses (in some cases) on a DCF basis, because nobody knows whether the discounted cash flow future value of those businesses will accrue to the current equity holders!  Clarity on that would help the situation.  Go ahead and wipe 'em the fuck out, or make it clear that you won't!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder, if they had kept Lehman alive, would the house of cards still be standing?  I think so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also wonder if letting Lehman go was just payback for a certain company not helping out in a previous bailout done years ago ... yes, such a payback would be petty and stupid, but look who was in a position to influence that decision!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">psuedonym</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:24:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deep Market Thoughts&amp;#8230;Could we Crash?</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/deep_market_thoughts8230could_we_crash/#comment-6432478</link><description>I am not sure the markets are working on supply/demand anymore. They may be, to a lesser extent, but it sure seems to me that everything is based upon mood. Irrational. Inconsistent. Sometimes just plain silly. When mood is ruling the day, nothing good can come from it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is there a mashup of cloudy days in NY/CHI and the stock market's performance? If so, please post a link b/c I am pretty sure there is a very unfortunate correlation of late.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sad. Probably true, too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisrechtsteiner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:13:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thinking about the future of Windows Mobile</title><link>http://bijanblog.disqus.com/thinking_about_the_future_of_windows_mobile/#comment-5871677</link><description>Agreed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bijan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:47:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thinking about the future of Windows Mobile</title><link>http://bijanblog.disqus.com/thinking_about_the_future_of_windows_mobile/#comment-5871531</link><description>RIM needs to work w/ Firefox to get a new browser based upon what they are doing w/ their new mobile project. That would be a home run for both in competing against MSFT, APPL and GOOG (Mozilla &amp; RIM that is).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisrechtsteiner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:40:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey Howard&amp;#8230;Stick Your Bank Charter Up Your Ass!</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/hey_howard8230stick_your_bank_charter_up_your_ass/#comment-5477295</link><description>Sad. Exactly</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:26:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey Howard&amp;#8230;Stick Your Bank Charter Up Your Ass!</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/hey_howard8230stick_your_bank_charter_up_your_ass/#comment-5465194</link><description>Sad but not surprising. The fastest way to fix something so fundamentally broken and corrupt is to begin, again, from the outside in. Let people w/ new ideas, new morals and new perspectives compete. Truly sad.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisrechtsteiner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:04:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Obama Crash</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/the_obama_crash/#comment-5434281</link><description>Disagree here Howard. We are nation of SPENDERS and BUYERS not sellers. That is the problem. We are too interested in consumption to actually see what is going on at a macro level. All $CC going out of business means is that people will got to $BBY to purchase their flat screen TV's not question the rampant and illogical consumption that has marked the past two generations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's ugly, no question, and it is going to take far longer and far more than a 'bail-out' to alter the underlying social consumption DNA and re-establish a more sustainable social &amp; economic environment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrisrechtsteiner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:00:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>