<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for djuggler</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-ad4f1856" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/djuggler/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:31:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: To All Teabaggers, You didn’t get mad…</title><link>http://progressivenation.us/2009/08/15/teabaggers-you-didnt-get-mad/#comment-14908558</link><description>I really liked you post! But everything starting with "f*ck" totally knocks the wind out of it. Consider ending your post after the ellipsis "..."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:31:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE; 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/12/facebook-usernames-live/#comment-10841533</link><description>&lt;a href="http://facebook.com/djuggler" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://facebook.com/djuggler&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:53:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: twdsc.us: @davewiner. "A friend is launching a site that says: &amp;quot;Only contributors can log in because we don't care what anonymous Internet commenters think.&amp;quot; :-)"</title><link>http://twdsc.us/95.html#comment-10390808</link><description>That is an interesting concept. Isn't that a bit similar to Facebook's roots?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:54:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: twdsc.us: @davewiner. "A friend is launching a site that says: &amp;quot;Only contributors can log in because we don't care what anonymous Internet commenters think.&amp;quot; :-)"</title><link>http://twdsc.us/95.html#comment-10315627</link><description>First, anonymity on the Internet is an illusion for most people. The common Internet user is not skilled enough to be anonymous.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I enjoy comments from people who identify themselves as well as people who choose to be anonymous. Granted, I do give more weight, more value, to a commenter who identifies themselves over an anonymous commenter. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What about people behind monikers? I use djuggler because no one can spell McCaughan. djuggler and Doug McCaughan are synonymous but a nickname can be used for anonymity as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;False accounts. Creating a temporary email address to create a "non-anonymous" account is fairly easy. A motivated anonymous commenter will get around the system. Is the overhead of policing worth it? Locks keep honest people honest. So is his "contributors" anyone that can create an account with valid credentials or are contributors person connects being allowed accounts? Two different scenarios.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 10:56:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Delicious 2.0: Who bookmarks any more?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/31/delicious-20-who-bookmarks-any-more/#comment-9949960</link><description>I still use Delicious daily (even find myself typing del.icio.us). I'm at 8785 bookmarks and I use it as a research tool. I find that I reference it rather regularly. For instance, someone was looking for a different mind mapping tool and although they could search Google and find similar results, my delicious marks are pre-filtered to only show stuff that I consider valuable. For me, Delicious is like subsetting the large search engines. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I am researching, I can collect articles and websites without having to thoroughly analyze them. I simply tag them appropriately then after I've collected my sources, I can easily return to them in Delicious to more closely examine them and write my conclusion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have asked the same questions. Of the 8785 bookmarks, many of the older ones are dead links (I wish Delicious would hide those. I don't want them removed because I can use them as a way to find the information in the wayback machine). Of the 8785 in all honesty, most of them I never return to give another look. But those few that I do, make the service and the habit well worth while to me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 09:03:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40 Web Developers to Follow on Twitter</title><link>http://thinkvitamin.com/dev/40-web-developers-to-follow-on-twitter/#comment-6791018</link><description>Doug McCaughan @djuggler is a totally rockin' web developer for PHP/MySQL CF/MSSQL &amp; up on social applications &amp; trends and should definitely be followed! (of course, I may be a little biased..well, a lot biased)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:47:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Do You Handle Twitter Overload?</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2008/12/04/how-do-you-handle-twitter-overload/#comment-4222186</link><description>I tihnk it depends on your goals with Twitter. If you want to be able to know the ins and outs of some people's lives, and not miss a single thing, then reduce your numbers greatly and follow only those few people. Personally, I use two Twitter accounts and have them both open at the same time using &lt;a href="http://twhirl.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twhirl.org&lt;/a&gt; One is 654 people and the other is following 9. I also supplement this with occasional searches on &lt;a href="http://search.twitter.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://search.twitter.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Next, use a service to watch who quits following you. Each time someone quits, check and see if they look like a spammer. I've found that most of the people quitting me do look like spammers. &lt;a href="http://realityme.net/2008/10/17/who-quit-following-you-on-twitter/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://realityme.net/2008/10/17/who-quit-follow...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I contend high numbers are how you get a feeling for the news on a particular topic. If you follow a few people ina particular subject area you will get a couple of opinions that may or may not reflect the community's true feelings. If you follow hundreds on that subject area you are likely to get a better picture of the real story. &lt;a href="http://realityme.net/2008/08/21/can-you-rely-on-twitter-for-breaking-news/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://realityme.net/2008/08/21/can-you-rely-on...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:41:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Critter&amp;#8217;s Krib  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; At least I have my health!</title><link>http://critz.org/2008/10/17/at-least-i-have-my-health/#comment-3402745</link><description>That picture is fake! It's all abs and no ink! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Listen to your heart and the money will follow. Of course, if you go consultant, be sure to vote Obama because you're really going to want that Universal Health Care! As for money in the bank, it disappears really quickly anyway :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You've got RTP. Surely there's a company there that would suck you up quickly. I've got one in email that's a bit of a venture but I'll pass it your way. If you don't have it tomorrow, nudge me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:45:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Calling All Mommies</title><link>http://tedmurphy.org/post/52891068#comment-2819395</link><description>Since beer is organic, you might try &lt;a href="http://realityme.net/2008/08/20/how-to-express-discontent/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Pet Odor and Stain Eliminator Remover&lt;/a&gt; by Unique. I get it from &lt;a href="http://www.petsuppliesplus.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Pet Supplies Plus&lt;/a&gt; in a gallon size concentrate (be sure to mix with water in a spray bottle per instructions). Since it is an enzyme that eats organic material, I would think that it would go after the beer the way it goes after urine. Of course, I've never seen drunk enzymes before so you may get some unexpected results!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:28:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is It Time To Say Goodbye To FeedBurner For Good?</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/2008/08/13/is-it-time-to-say-goodbye-to-feedburner-for-good/#comment-1384844</link><description>I've been asking the same question. I see no advantage to using Feedburner. As a matter of fact, it delays my feed distribution unless I manually ping it. I'm done with Feedburner.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:00:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Humble Pie and Twitter&amp;#8217;s Value to Enterprise</title><link>http://www.purplecar.net/2008/05/05/humble-pie-and-twitters-value-to-enterprise/#comment-4823648</link><description>Chris Brogan (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/chrisbrogan" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/chrisbrogan&lt;/a&gt;) often &lt;a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/some-differences-between-pitching-mainstream-press-and-bloggers/" rel="nofollow"&gt;posts twitter conversations like this&lt;/a&gt;. I think Darren Rouse at &lt;a href="http://problogger.net/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://problogger.net/&lt;/a&gt; has done this also but I can't find an example right now. Perhaps it was Tim at &lt;a href="http://www.spyjournal.biz/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.spyjournal.biz/&lt;/a&gt; but I can't find an example there either. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ok. I'll stick with @chrisbrogan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's effective!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 13:47:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some Differences Between Pitching Mainstream Press and Bloggers</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/some-differences-between-pitching-mainstream-press-and-bloggers/#comment-8518403</link><description>I should have added that as a blogger, if you want me to talk about your product, put it in my hands. If you send me a demo or a sample, I will use it and I will write about it. I will be honest and not always favorable. I just used a product that completely failed to live up to its marketing and I'm going to say just that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/z11" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/z11&lt;/a&gt; believes that courting bloggers is far more affective than main stream media.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:54:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When not talking about Twitter, what do you do in life?</title><link>http://www.ericrice.com/blog/2008/04/22/when-not-talking-about-twitter-what-do-you-do-in-life/#comment-366405</link><description>Um. Drawing a blank here man.. Uh. Wait a minute! It's meetings at school; meetings at support groups; cooking food (seems constant but centers around dinner); when not cooking food, buying food; D&amp;D and horse riding lessons for the 17 year old; flag practice and other school activities for the 14 year old; scout leader for the 17 year old and 14 year old which means meeting, meeting, camping, spending, spending, spending, and training; karate for the 14 year old; girl scouts and birthday parties for the 5 year old; every waking moment to the over energized 2 year old; HoneyDos for the wife including painting, grass cutting, plumbing, auto maintenance, drywalling, squirrel catching, etc etc etc; wait a minute, this sounds like stuff other people do...but I am their taxi cab driver! Oh. And I juggle!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:39:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling Twitter accounts &amp;#8211; what&amp;#8217;s this b.s.?</title><link>http://rickmahn.com/2008/04/15/selling-twitter-accounts-whats-this-bs/#comment-14017757</link><description>&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/sethgodin" rel="nofollow"&gt;Seth Godin&lt;/a&gt; has 3392 followers and follows 0 because it's not him. &lt;a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2008/02/not-seth-godin.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Seth Godin doesn't use Twitter&lt;/a&gt;. It looks like in some cases it &lt;a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/02/02/when-seth-godin-isnt-seth-godin/" rel="nofollow"&gt;has hurt Seth Godin's reputation&lt;/a&gt; so perhaps the same will happen to Andrew Baron's..um..does he have a good reputation?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:56:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Suffering From Socialnetworkitis?</title><link>http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2007/10/are_you_suffering_from_socialnetworkitis.php#comment-1746221</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I post mini-updates and pictures throughout my day&lt;/blockquote&gt;How do you post pictures through Twitter?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 05:13:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hitchhiker's Guide to Twitter (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/01/27/hitchhikersGuideToTwitter.html#comment-104960</link><description>Replying @[username] does not imply that [username] will see your message. Depending on whether or not they follow you, how they have their preferences setup, and how closely they watch their Twitter account, they may never see the message. Do not be offended! If you want to be sure they saw your message, you can always email the link to the message which may encourage them to follow you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:27:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hitchhiker's Guide to Twitter (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/01/27/hitchhikersGuideToTwitter.html#comment-104955</link><description>Yes. Many people live vicariously through others. They are the lurkers and nothing is wrong with that. I do think many people fear exposing themselves to potential ridicule. They are the voyeurs (perhaps introverted).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I see bloggers frequently get frustrated and say "no one comments! why do I do this?" Lack of comments and interaction do not imply lack of audience. Commenting, or replying, takes effort and commitment. Reading and absorbing information is far more passive and safe.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:24:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hitchhiker's Guide to Twitter (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/01/27/hitchhikersGuideToTwitter.html#comment-104532</link><description>Follow @redcross My reasons noted at &lt;a href="http://realityme.net/2007/10/26/put-redcross-in-your-twitter/" rel="nofollow"&gt;RealityMe.net&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are 3 types of Twitters:&lt;br&gt;1) Exhibitionists, Voyeurs, Gossips&lt;br&gt;2) News feeds&lt;br&gt;3) Topic Specific&lt;br&gt;(a 4th would be Spammers/Friend collectors but you should unfollow those quickly)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The type of information or seek or produce (1,2 or 3 above) will determine how many followers you can effectively have. Twitter is far different when following 40 people than it is following 250 than it is following 7000. If you are following a low number you can be intimate with your followers and really stay abreast of each other. If you are following something in the hundreds then you are getting a wealth of information but you will miss messages that allow you to build intimate bonds with the people you are following. If you are following thousands then you likely are using Twitter as a means of driving traffic to your website or as a means of pushing information out to an already loyal audience that really wants your info (or you are a friend collector).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Link from above (incase comments don't allow links): &lt;a href="http://realityme.net/2007/10/26/put-redcross-in-your-twitter/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://realityme.net/2007/10/26/put-redcross-in...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:09:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10000 Tweets on Twitter</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/10000-tweets-on-twitter/#comment-8514252</link><description>When Twitter first hit the scene I signed up but didn't get it. I could send a message to my blog from my cell phone where I had control over the content and could search it and edit it anyway I liked. Relying on Twitter felt like relying on any 3rd party solution (same reasons I dislike Blogger).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am not sure what convinced me to change my view on Twitter but I gave a chance and realized that although I could post to my blog from my phone that people commenting on my blog didn't come back to me so Twitter offered a complete conversation that otherwise I'd miss.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Twitter has connected me to people that otherwise would remain mystical names in the headlines. Now I joke with our local newspaper's editor when in the past I would have just been a name on a letter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I use Twitter to keep short posts off my blog. I use Twitter to solicit input and get suggestions. I use Twitter to feel connected to the world while working independently from my basement. I use Twitter for laughs. I use Twitter to stay informed! And I use Twitter to inform.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I forget who said it but I read some describing Twitter as IRC 2.0. Almost fits the bill!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:06:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Casting in late 2007 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/29/castingInLate2007.html#comment-22342</link><description>&lt;a href="http://Flickr.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Flickr.com&lt;/a&gt; offers rss feeds for pictures and a separate feed for comments on pictures.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:55:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will videoblogs be outlawed because of California&amp;#8217;s accessibility laws?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2007/10/14/will-videoblogs-be-outlawed-because-of-californias-accessibility-laws/#comment-9692108</link><description>ProejectReadon could be the answer &lt;a href="http://www.projectreadon.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.projectreadon.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:39:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What the RIAA Judgment Means to Me</title><link>http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/10/05/what-the-riaa-judgment-means-to-me/#comment-1348020</link><description>To put this in perspective, she is billed $222,000 for making songs available breaking copyright (and if I read the judgment correctly it was "for making them available" not actually distributing anything---that's like arresting me for possibly providing beer to children because I have a 6 pack in the fridge and people under 21 walk through my house) BUT a school bus driver gets busted for drinking on the job and is fined $482 &lt;a href="http://www.twincities.com/ci_7094916?nclick_check=1" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.twincities.com/ci_7094916?nclick_che...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Glenn Reynolds (&lt;a href="http://instapundit.com/archives2/010264.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://instapundit.com/archives2/010264.php&lt;/a&gt;) sums it up "One offends a powerful interest group. The other just puts kids at risk." while summarizing James Lileks: &lt;a href="http://buzz.mn/?q=node/2693" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://buzz.mn/?q=node/2693&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:11:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Delurk, Delurk, Wherever You Are</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2007/01/08/delurk-delurk-wherever-you-are/#comment-3778273</link><description>Checkin in.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djuggler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:57:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>