<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for earwood</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-a6e8508c" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/earwood/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:40:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Today Can Be Special</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2009/11/04/today-can-be-special/#comment-21890966</link><description>Leigh - Agreed, each day is worth a lot and I love that you remembered the "iceberg".  :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:40:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Today Can Be Special</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2009/11/04/today-can-be-special/#comment-21880654</link><description>Kevin - I appreciate that.  Great people make great business, so come join us! :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:57:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Today Can Be Special</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2009/11/04/today-can-be-special/#comment-21880456</link><description>Deryl - Thanks!  Tuesday sounds like a great reason, right?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:56:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Round Capital, NYC, and Our “Born Again” Startup</title><link>http://www.thisisgoingtobebig.com/2009/10/first-round-capital-nyc-and-our-born-again-startup.html#comment-17928917</link><description>Congratulations Charlie!  Sounds like everyone wins on this deal.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:43:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Private Investment:  Member Minded</title><link>http://andyswan.com/blog/2009/09/10/new-private-investment-member-minded/#comment-16318170</link><description>Mark - Andy's politely saying I'm not short on words, which is very true.  Our Member Minded team is excited about Andy's involvement.  It's a great fit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:56:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Doing Less Not More (Get in free)</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2009/08/19/doing-less-not-more-get-in-free/#comment-15128835</link><description>Thanks Deryl.  I'm really looking forward to this one.  The crowd will be sizable so the networking will be great, I just have keep up my end of the deal.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:09:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Wow For Less than $3.00</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2009/05/27/how-to-wow-for-less-than-300/#comment-10262791</link><description>Gregg - I'm not a AL junkie, but here's the best pitch I can give... sites like Yelp or City Search allow anonymous reviews (i.e. - your username could be gwstar19 and I wouldn't really know who you are.  AL at least posts who I am so a user can see that I actually live in Louisville.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another BIG selling point to me is... paying money keeps out trolls and hinders those gaming the system.  While a business could buy 10 friends a membership to go say nice things, I believe most won't because it look so odd in the context of Angie's List.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I prefer to ask folks that I know for a referral, but I think Angie's List is the next best step if you can't find a person you know.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Todd</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:33:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Asus Eee PC 1000HE Netbook Review: Benefits Galore</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2009/05/01/asus-eee-pc-1000he-netbook-review-benefits-galore/#comment-9978070</link><description>Mike - Thank you very much for the update and I'm happy to hear OsX worked (especially with wifi).  How come the Verizon card was a headache?  I thought that would be easy and please keep me updated with your progress.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:54:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Asus Eee PC 1000HE Netbook Review: Benefits Galore</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2009/05/01/asus-eee-pc-1000he-netbook-review-benefits-galore/#comment-9129962</link><description>I haven't installed osX86 yet.  Still playing with XP for now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 11:25:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Do You Create Urgency?</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2009/04/20/how-do-you-create-urgency/#comment-8486718</link><description>Leigh - Great one!  Definitely another way to turn the discussion is opportunity cost or damage.  Love it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:25:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Do You Create Urgency?</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2009/04/20/how-do-you-create-urgency/#comment-8484829</link><description>Matt - Thanks for the comment.  I agree deadlines many times (just like sales offers) do seem arbitrary.  Motivation or understanding of a larger picture could definitely help.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:16:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Business Effects of 9/11</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2007/09/11/the-business-effects-of-911/#comment-7786556</link><description>Of course, I'm glad to give credit.  Thanks for commenting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:37:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zappos&amp;#8217; Amazing Return Policy</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2009/03/24/zappos-amazing-return-policy/#comment-7493546</link><description>Deryl - I agree.  It's really hard NOT to like Zappos.  I'm just impressed that they don't have to play the cheapest, "always on sale" game.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:54:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The great depression&amp;#8230;.</title><link>http://andyswan.com/blog/?p=163#comment-7137176</link><description>Someeccards are getting funnier by the day.  This is a great one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:49:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;raquo; Top 5 Overused Business Cliches | Todd Earwood</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2009/02/27/top-5-overused-business-cliches/#comment-6812557</link><description>Bill - I think you're speaking startup blasphemy with the first couple and I love the "its the economy" one.  We all know it's terrible, but it seems many have found their scapegoat.  :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:11:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;raquo; Top 5 Overused Business Cliches | Todd Earwood</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2009/02/27/top-5-overused-business-cliches/#comment-6724251</link><description>I haven't heard "wrestle the bull", but I'm guilty of saying CMS (not the full name).  Does that count as the same?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:28:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;raquo; Top 5 Overused Business Cliches | Todd Earwood</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2009/02/27/top-5-overused-business-cliches/#comment-6710325</link><description>Mark - I'm guilty of using the word leverage, but I haven't been leveraging our synergies. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:06:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;raquo; Top 5 Overused Business Cliches | Todd Earwood</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2009/02/27/top-5-overused-business-cliches/#comment-6710305</link><description>Katy - I love your list.  How in the world did I forget "out of the box"???  Possibly worse than synergy!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:05:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t Pick Gene</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2009/01/22/dont-pick-gene/#comment-5700241</link><description>Since I don't know who you are or your background, I have to make some assumptions.. 1) you haven't owned a business, 2) you've never worked with a quality salesperson and 3) you work in the scientific/tech area.  I agree that some salespeople just talk, but I know many others that provide real value to the company.  Obviously without sales, a great idea from any source never reaches the market.  Overall, I just view it as the team approach.  HR, Accounting, IT and Sales have to work together or no one has a job.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for your point about giving revenue, I'm unclear on why an employee would get a large amount of revenue?  The shareholders of the company won't find that prudent as they've taken the risk for the company.  I don't see it as an issue of confidence at all.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I work for someone and they pay my salary and benefits, I really don't have much risk.  I believe those who join in the risk should share in the reward.  That's not to say, an employee shouldn't receive monetary compensation for innovation or a quality idea, but if I save the company $250,0000 with an idea, do I deserve half of that amount?  I believe the answer is no as I'm still going to get paid each pay period while the shareholders may not get a return on their investment (i.e. - risk).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that to make it big, you must do it on your own.  But that extends to folks far beyond the scientific area.  It's just a trade-off, being on your own is super hard and I think it's even hard starting by yourself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lastly, I'd ask you type your real name. My blog isn't to be controversial and I'm not attempting to garner large amounts of traffic, but when there's a discussion I think all folks involved would prefer to know we're talking with a real person.  I don't like making assumptions about people, but I don't know how to reply to you without some context.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:05:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t Pick Gene</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2009/01/22/dont-pick-gene/#comment-5622468</link><description>Thomas - you make several great points and  I think you've just given me another post on how the business creates more Gene-types.  My favorites are not firing people and structured bonuses are demotivating.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think to avoid becoming a Gene, a business has to personalize our work structure (why not four 10-hour days?), environment (why always in the office?) and match upward growth opps or financial incentives to us individually.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:52:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t Pick Gene</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2009/01/22/dont-pick-gene/#comment-5621009</link><description>I'm not sure giving up cash motivates Gene, does it?  Not everyone is motivated by money.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:09:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 650 Days of Twitter</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2008/12/15/650-days-of-twitter/#comment-4434779</link><description>Guilty as charged.  &amp;lt;/pimping&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:32:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Christmas Time&amp;#8230;.and yes, it&amp;#8217;s up!</title><link>http://andyswan.com/blog/?p=124#comment-4251649</link><description>This is so strong, I propose it deserves its own domain... &lt;a href="http://SwanYuletide.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;SwanYuletide.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:46:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Do You Handle Twitter Overload?</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2008/12/04/how-do-you-handle-twitter-overload/#comment-4227243</link><description>Lawson - great to see your name pop up here.  Tim Ferriss for sure has a unique Twitter approach, but he's also very, very focused on self-promotion.  I think you've hit it on the head... it must be low maintenance.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:14:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Do You Handle Twitter Overload?</title><link>http://www.toddearwood.com/2008/12/04/how-do-you-handle-twitter-overload/#comment-4227217</link><description>Jeff - I agree, Twitter can be good for organic marketing and is a good place for newbies to start (per your video).  I don't think following back everyone works for me.  While I want to participate in many conversations, we all have our separate groups we wish to closely track (friend, industry thought leaders, etc).  From the previous comments TweetDeck may be the fix for my twitter use.  Thanks for the comment and video link.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">earwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:12:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>