<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ericrice</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/ericrice/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:51:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Editorial:  Comment section reflects the good and the bad</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_editorial_comment_section_reflects_the_good_and_the_bad/#comment-21808306</link><description>The comments on the op-ed about comments' quality is ironically delicious.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:51:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Letters: Socialized health care is the only real rational solution</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_letters_socialized_health_care_is_the_only_real_rational_solution/#comment-20641233</link><description>I love the irony in how actual socialists view the current gov't views as too right-wing and, slippery slope arguments notwithstanding, not socialist.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:27:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Gilroy police briefs: Man attacked in predawn hours, 'childhood dispute' settled in park</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_gilroy_police_briefs_man_attacked_in_predawn_hours_childhood_dispute_settled_in_p/#comment-20152443</link><description>It's because you are displaying a type of logical fallacy called 'hasty generalization'. When you misuse the 'data' the way you've been doing, it's an inductive generalization. This data can be rearranged to note that the police blotter is filled with all MALES or all YOUNG people or ROMAN CATHOLICS (if we estimate 80-90% of Mexicans being Roman Catholic). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That, and perhaps the *way* you are doing it. on. every. post. What exactly are you trying to gain? A ballot measure to just start rounding up all brown-looking people JUST IN CASE? Awesome sci-fi movie material.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But heck, you called me a -douche-, so I expect any type of reasonable discourse is out of the question. It operates on the principle that much internet discussion is based upon: anonymous vitriol. No need  to worry about having accountability for words. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's why you're in the wilderness.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:19:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Possible Gilroy gang stabbing continues weekend violence</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_possible_gilroy_gang_stabbing_continues_weekend_violence/#comment-19667310</link><description>Eric Rice, you're a douche. This has nothing to do with side A and side B. This is just Mexicans behaving like Mexicans. Are you blind? Do you read the crime report in the Morgan Hill Times?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Realist</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:18:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Possible Gilroy gang stabbing continues weekend violence</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_possible_gilroy_gang_stabbing_continues_weekend_violence/#comment-19592966</link><description>Any military industrial complex can explain this. Out-number. Out-gun. Especially when side A needs to defeat side B. That is all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:10:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Update: No arrests in Friday homicide</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_update_no_arrests_in_friday_homicide/#comment-19450189</link><description>Thanks for your comments, Norm. It drives me up the wall seeing the snark in the comments that devolve the whole gang situation as "buncha punks we gotta git 'em deport 'em shoot 'em", without any regard to the massive, MASSIVE infrastructure and organization that is North American gangs. It loops from the streets to prisons to the respective home countries and back. But hey, we live in the Twitter world now. It's soundbites or nothin'.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:19:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Third Street construction plans for local businesses poorly executed</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_third_street_construction_plans_for_local_businesses_poorly_executed/#comment-16700325</link><description>The promenade is nice, but too large for our small downtown.&lt;br&gt;We have limited space downtown... why gobble up so much for parkway/walkway?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Shouldn't 1st priority be retail.&lt;br&gt;2nd should be parking.&lt;br&gt;3rd should be a scaled down 3rd street promenade.&lt;br&gt;Or do we simply want a very expensive taxpayers'  "Promenade to NO-where".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and why the wasteful parallel parking ? we'd get twice the parking spaces if they were perpendicualar to the street, instead of parallel.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tina</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:33:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Decisions about downtown leave a lot to be desired</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_decisions_about_downtown_leave_a_lot_to_be_desired/#comment-16696249</link><description>I think it's a Constitutional Right to have vast landscapes of parking to prevent the slightest bit of exercise or interaction with fellow citizens. /sarc</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:53:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Morgan Hill Welcomes Wal-Mart</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_morgan_hill_welcomes_wal_mart_62/#comment-16484582</link><description>If I recall, it was an issue of density (or lack thereof). MH wanted Whole Foods, but they didn't want MH. Not enough population with a certain area to justify.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:37:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Third Street construction plans for local businesses poorly executed</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_third_street_construction_plans_for_local_businesses_poorly_executed/#comment-14694941</link><description>Thanks Eric, that's amazing what is being done. I think we can put up with the mess in exchange for a beautiful street. It droped my jaw.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blueblazer68</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:42:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Third Street construction plans for local businesses poorly executed</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_third_street_construction_plans_for_local_businesses_poorly_executed/#comment-14656227</link><description>Blue, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See &lt;a href="http://www.morganhillrda.ca.gov/thirdstreet.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.morganhillrda.ca.gov/thirdstreet.html&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.morganhillrda.ca.gov/images/3rd_St_Site_Plan.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.morganhillrda.ca.gov/images/3rd_St_S...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:56:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Red Phone: New directional signs: Who and why?</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_red_phone_new_directional_signs_who_and_why/#comment-13911744</link><description>Love the signs. They call out attractions and points of interests that might have gone unnoticed. They also give MH a bit of a 'there's stuff to do here' vibe while attempting to promote some sort of city character and soul (which some might consider to be either lacking or non-existent).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:52:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Police blotter: 11-year-old accused of residential burglary</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_police_blotter_11_year_old_accused_of_residential_burglary/#comment-13772439</link><description>Yeah, this law was enacted the same time as the mandatory handsfree-in-car rule for mobile phones. Jan 1, 2009, I believe.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 00:26:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Socialized health care is not the answer</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_socialized_health_care_is_not_the_answer/#comment-13734245</link><description>I can wake up in the morning and see a conclusive story that OMG socialized healthcare is the devil and by the time I go to bed, I see a conclusive story that OMG no big deal, it's fine. Lather, rinse, repeat.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Besides, if America's the best thing since the invention of the solar system, wouldn't *we* be able to do socialized health care better than the *rest* of the world? I mean, come on, we're AMERICA, we can do no wrong, right? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We're almost the best in the world at arrogance, but I think China has us beat. Go fig.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:23:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Twittering leads to twubble</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_twittering_leads_to_twubble/#comment-13485660</link><description>I'm in my late 30s and currently behind the helm of five twitter accounts, one of which is @morganhill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The short-form publishing format of Twitter and other services has history in SMS messaging-- limited by 160 characters worldwide. Twitter allows for 140 characters (reduced from 160 for extra administrative overhead). The medium itself requires the abbreviation of common words. For example 'you' and 'too' become 'u' and '2'. "Before" becomes 'b4'. This short form real estate is dictated by brevity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A deeper problem is the brevity of information. For those of us that lament the headline-driven soundbite-obsessed media culture of America, the short form of Twitter brings the publishing of the almighty headline within reach of the common man.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've found that even I'm aware of this, limiting my tweets length to accommodate 're-tweeting', the act of re-broadcasting a short update, or 'tweet'. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For example, I've tweeted this very op-ed and it occupies all but 35 characters, so anyone who receives my @morganhill update can re-post it with automatic attribution.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A 're-tweet' would look like: "RT @morganhill Robert Mitchell has an op-ed in MH Times about Twittering leading to Twubble (groan) &lt;a href="http://rez.to/ymftra%22" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://rez.to/ymftra"&lt;/a&gt; with 20 characters remaining.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The do-it-yourself soundbite culture is the bigger concern. Imagine in 20-30 years when those raised in today's climate start crafting legislation. Is it any surprise that 1000 pages of proposed legislation in our government isn't being read? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our DNA is changing, and that's where our attention should be.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:58:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The AP Puts A Gun To Its Head. And A Grenade. And A Rocket Launcher.</title><link>http://parislemon.disqus.com/the_ap_puts_a_gun_to_its_head_and_a_grenade_and_a_rocket_launcher/#comment-13259256</link><description>Would love to see contrasts between AP vs. other orgs like Reuters etc. Who gets it right, who fails, etc. I tend to have good experiences with Reuters for some reason.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:06:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Council to mull skate park user fee, staffing</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_council_to_mull_skate_park_user_fee_staffing/#comment-13193090</link><description>Why do the profanity citation dispensers from the three seashells scene in the movie 'Demolition Man' suddenly come to mind?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:59:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Council to mull skate park user fee, staffing</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_council_to_mull_skate_park_user_fee_staffing/#comment-13192223</link><description>Well put, sir/ma'am.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:48:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Video: Helmetless at the Skate Park</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_video_helmetless_at_the_skate_park_73/#comment-12976758</link><description>FIRST OFF I NEVER SIAD THAT THEY DONT DO ANY GOOD.. LEARN TO READ BEFORE YOU TRY TO GO ON THE ATTACK SMART GUY. MY POINT IS THAT KIDS AND ADULTS ALIKE WILL GET HURT NO MATTER WHAT WE DO. WE ARE CLUMSEY... THATS LIFE. SO MR INDEPENDANT FUNDAMENTAL, HERE IS AN IDEA NEXT TIME YOUR KIDS GO OUT SIDE (ASSUMING YOU HAVE ATLEAST ONE.) WHY DONT YOU GO AHEAD AND WRAP THEM UP IN BLANKETS AND MAKE SURE YOU USE TWO LAYERS OF BUBBLE WRAP AND DUCT TAPE THEM UP TIGHT... BECAUSE YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT OBSCURE THINGS MAY HAPPEN.. OR HERE IS AN IDEA. I AM AT THIS PARK ALMOST EVERY NIGHT, WHY DONT YOU AND THE REST OF YOU COMPLAINERS COME DOWN TONIGHT AND WATCH WHAT THEASE KIDS CAN DO... THIS IS NOT A PRO PARK, ITS NOT THAT BIG AND MOST OF THE KIDS HERE ARE WAY TOO SCARED TO TRY ANYTHING SUPER BIG.. THEY ARE MOSTLY JUST SKATING AROUND AND WATCHING.. EVERYONE I RIDE WITH IS 23 AND OLDER. EXCEPT MY SON.. AND WE ARE THE ONLY ONES THERE THAT ARE GOING BIG ENUGH TO DO ANY DAMAGE...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bmadsen5150</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:13:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Video: Helmetless at the Skate Park</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_video_helmetless_at_the_skate_park_73/#comment-12938245</link><description>You had me at "Suburbs simply aren't built for renaissance."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:37:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | City to spend $310K on Granada</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_city_to_spend_310k_on_granada/#comment-12923532</link><description>Good point, Eric.  If that's the case, if indies won't fly, we DO NOT need a theatre in downtown. The city should SAVE their ONE THIRD OF A MILLION DOLLARS. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is the purpose of MH City/taxpayers spending 310k+ just so people can watch a movie downtown instead of at Tennant station?&lt;br&gt;Tax payers Costs = 310k +&lt;br&gt;Benifit = ? you tell me.  &lt;br&gt;Do the benifits Really outway the cost of spending 1/3 MILLION dollars?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“The Morgan Hill Redevelopment Agency will spend $310,000 to renovate the Granada Theater to a level suitable for INTERIM cinema use.”   Isn’t 310k a little excessive for an interim project ?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;btw - Sure, Gunksy is all for it. The money is not coming out of his pocket. Easy for him to want all the nice new amenities.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">reality check</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 13:59:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | City to spend $310K on Granada</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_city_to_spend_310k_on_granada/#comment-12901257</link><description>Going back to the earlier point you made about 'if a downtown theater would fly in MH', I can't even imagine those MOVIES flying here.  Indie flicks, art flicks, documentaries and foreign films with subtitles? Really?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 02:43:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Anarchy at the CRC</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_anarchy_at_the_crc/#comment-12901019</link><description>No preachy adult here, but keep this in mind. You can shred your leg, maybe it will get infected, maybe amputated-- but hey, they got cool cyborg legs you can snap on. No biggie. Brain transplants? Not so much. So, it'll happen, but probably not to you. It'll happen to one of your friends. Which one?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You don't get to pick.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 02:15:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Anarchy at the CRC: Skaters without helmets</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_anarchy_at_the_crc_skaters_without_helmets/#comment-12718432</link><description>ahahahaha, seriously, we should start writing the comments now for when graffiti inevitably shows up, so we can continue the 'needs more parking' story arc (because of the creative ways the lines are being drawn).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:28:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MorganHillTimes.com | Courthouse fails to deliver � so far</title><link>http://morganhill.disqus.com/morganhilltimescom_courthouse_fails_to_deliver_so_far/#comment-11996100</link><description>Oh, neat, a fat guy joke. Almost makes you credible with your grievances!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericrice</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:20:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>