<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for faithx5</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-3bffcf69" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/faithx5/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:44:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Discuss: Would You Buy More DVDs If Rentals Were Delayed Four Weeks?</title><link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-would-you-buy-more-dvds-if-rentals-were-delayed-four-weeks-robhr.php#comment-21273920</link><description>I never rent things when they come out anyway. Just throw it in my Netflix queue and when it gets to me, it gets to me. If I'm in a hurry to see something, I'll see it in theatres. This idea seems more likely to encourage piracy than anything else.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:44:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The biggest difference between Twitter and Facebook</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/24/the-biggest-difference-between-twitter-and-facebook/#comment-20948136</link><description>That's not true. I'm far from a celebrity, and while I get more interaction on Friendfeed (because I'm more active there), it's not that difficult to get good interaction on Twitter. Maybe if you didn't change your account so often and made it easier for people to find and follow you (and followed more people yourself), you wouldn't find it useless. If you'd prefer to use it like an RSS reader, that's fine, but don't make it sound like Twitter's fault that you don't find interaction there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:30:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The biggest difference between Twitter and Facebook</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/24/the-biggest-difference-between-twitter-and-facebook/#comment-20940340</link><description>Wait, hold on - I've been able to see other people's comments on my friends' FB items since comments came out. That's not new is it? Also, what would the alternative be? Hide their comments and show just my friends' comments? But that would lead to lots of out-of-context comments as friends respond to non-friends in the comment stream (kind of like when you have someone blocked on FF, I guess)...how would that be better?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The thing that would finally make Facebook more useful for me is enabling discovery. It's very difficult to find new people or content on Facebook - showing other people's comments on my friends' items seems obvious to me. When are they going to show me items from non-friends that friends comment on? It seems that everyone's concerned about getting less content. I want more content, or at least the option to get more content when I want it. Things that are more limited (and limited by people who are not me) are not more valuable to me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:05:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hippie Hippie Shake (preview screening)</title><link>http://frame.the-frame.com/2009/09/21/hippie-hippie-shake-preview-screening/#comment-19835884</link><description>Thanks for the comment! That's good to know; there's a lot to like about the film.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 02:32:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Film on TV: September 28-October 4</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/blog/2009/09/28/film-on-tv-september-28-october-4/#comment-17851075</link><description>That would be awesome, but I'd rather you link to the version on Row Three (&lt;a href="http://www.rowthree.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.rowthree.com&lt;/a&gt; - the most recent Film on TV is here: &lt;a href="http://www.rowthree.com/2009/09/27/film-on-tv-september-28-october-4/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.rowthree.com/2009/09/27/film-on-tv-s...&lt;/a&gt;). I crosspost here so friends and family don't miss it, but I'd prefer any links to go to Row Three. I usually post them late Sunday night.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:42:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jandy's Clippings</title><link>http://tumblr.the-frame.com/post/198663033#comment-17701647</link><description>I guess I saw it more as the author's perspective on writing - if they don't have that kind of emotional connection to their writing, whether or not it means the writing itself is that emotional, then don't do it. I'm not sure I wholly agree anyway, because a lot of writing that's still worthwhile is kind of mundane during the writing process itself. But I liked the quote.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:52:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fall TV is Upon Us Again</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/blog/2009/09/24/fall-tv-is-upon-us-again/#comment-17357970</link><description>Oh, no worries! I told everyone I know they have to watch it. :) How about if I watch it, DVR it, play it again, and then play it on hulu as well?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:00:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joffi's Stuff - Lauren Bacall (via truity1967)</title><link>http://joffi.tumblr.com/post/167351763#comment-15182652</link><description>Now this is classic, right here.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:25:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jandy's Clippings</title><link>http://tumblr.the-frame.com/post/164032071#comment-14901460</link><description>It's pretty freaking adorable, isn't it?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 04:09:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jandy's Clippings</title><link>http://tumblr.the-frame.com/post/163725608#comment-14894564</link><description>Thanks, it might be &lt;a href="http://jennylewis.tumblr.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;jennylewis.tumblr.com&lt;/a&gt;. Wish the emilyhaines one had comments installed so I could just ask the mod there. :/</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:47:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Crossovers (Hint: They&amp;#8217;re Bad)</title><link>http://www.jonathan-hardesty.com/2009/08/11/on-crossovers-hint-theyre-bad/#comment-14699769</link><description>Exactly. Crossovers work for spinoffs because they allow characters who used to be on the same show to reconnect.  With unconnected shows, it seems so much like fanfic to me. I haven't watched Lie to Me at all, though, so I can't comment on whether it would work with Bones. It might work with some shows that are similar in tone, but I think it would still seem gimmicky.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 02:54:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Crossovers (Hint: They&amp;#8217;re Bad)</title><link>http://www.jonathan-hardesty.com/2009/08/11/on-crossovers-hint-theyre-bad/#comment-14699219</link><description>Buffy/Angel crossovers worked decently. Though, okay, yeah, they still seemed contrived most of the time. (Aside from the Faith redemption arc, which was awesome, but basically only Faith crossed over.) Crossovers for unrelated shows? I gotta think that's a bad idea.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 02:14:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yeah Yeah Yeahs Replace B-Boys at Lolla</title><link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/07/yeah-yeah-yeahs-replace-b-boys-at-lolla/#comment-13088719</link><description>I was very excited to hear this. :) I'm not a fan of the Beastie Boys, and I'm becoming a big fan of the YYYs. I was bummed to miss them at Coachella, so I'm gonna do my damnedest not to miss them again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And this short is whacked out. Just gotta say.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:25:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jandy's Clippings</title><link>http://tumblr.the-frame.com/post/144047358#comment-12894055</link><description>Yep! Or, I think, a FuckYeahAmyMillan image, if there is such a thing. Must be from the recent fully-staffed Broken Social Scene concert. Actually, I think it was originally reblogged from a Feist tumblr. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 21:09:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TONIGHT on Cinemax</title><link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/07/tonight-on-cinemax/#comment-12531183</link><description>Three tracks from Horehound are also coming out for Rock Band next Tuesday. Still deciding whether to get them. I can't figure out if I really like them, or if I just think they're interesting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 02:29:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Cleveland Show Looks Beyond Ridiculous</title><link>http://www.dcfemella.com/reviews/2009/07/10/the-cleveland-show-looks-beyond-ridiculous/#comment-12520395</link><description>I hope it ends up being better than this looks. :/ One of my friends is an animator on it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:13:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 975 (107). &lt;i&gt;The Far Country&lt;/i&gt; (1955, Anthony Mann)</title><link>http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/2009/07/975-107-the-far-country-1955-anthony-mann/#comment-12464010</link><description>I recently watched the Mann/Stewart collaboration &lt;i&gt;The Man from Laramie&lt;/i&gt;, and enjoyed it a lot. It's been a long time since I've seen the others, including &lt;i&gt;The Far Country&lt;/i&gt;. Might be time to revisit. Thanks, as always, for the great collection of criticism.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:47:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone Apps For Movie Geeks</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/07/07/iphone-apps-for-movie-geeks/#comment-12412001</link><description>I've got both Now Playing and Flixster, but Now Playing doesn't seem to be updating showtimes properly anymore. Looking at the Movies tab doesn't list anything that came out in the past couple of weeks, and I just searched for Public Enemies directly, and it just spins and won't find theatres. If I look at the theatres tab and pull up a major multiplex near me, it says it hasn't reported showtimes since like June 27th (not true, because Flixster pulled it up immediately). Anyone else have this issue?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:40:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Online Music and Book Logging</title><link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/01/online-music-and-book-logging/#comment-12174431</link><description>Main differences between last.fm and Pandora:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Last.fm is built around tracking the music you listen to on your computer or iPod and building your musical profile around that. Pandora has no equivalent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) Pandora is a radio station site first, a social/info site second. Last.fm is the opposite.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3) Pandora builds its stations by using a musical similarity algorithm - if you add a song to a station, it will add other songs based on how similar they are in musical tone, structure, instrumentation, vocals, etc. Last.fm builds its stations based on aggregated listener data. If you start a station with a song or artist, it will figure out what you're likely to enjoy based on what other people who like that song or artist like.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I generally tend to find that Pandora is better at finding music I don't know about but like, and last.fm is better at everything else. So I tend to only use Pandora when I'm in music-discovery mode.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 12:42:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joffi's Stuff - I just wanted to post her Jenny avatar - via...</title><link>http://joffi.tumblr.com/post/132087626#comment-11936281</link><description>You has a point. I've been meaning to change my last.fm avatar forever (it's like five years old). There's also some Zooey ones in that post. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:31:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Image of the Day: 022</title><link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/06/image-of-the-day-022/#comment-11926139</link><description>So I just figured out today that the house where Michael Jackson grew up on Hayvenhurst Ave in Encino? Is a block and a half away from my apartment. Which explains the road blockage and massive numbers of media vehicles that have been there since Friday.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:46:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joffi's Stuff - I just wanted to post her Jenny avatar - via...</title><link>http://joffi.tumblr.com/post/132087626#comment-11925856</link><description>If I were still on Livejournal, that would totally be my new default. I sort of want to grab it and upload it to my dormant account JUST BECAUSE.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:26:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music Video: White Rabbits - Percussion Gun</title><link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/06/music-video-white-rabbits-percussion-gun/#comment-11887761</link><description>Thanks for posting this, Jonathan. I've been hearing a lot of buzz around White Rabbits, but hadn't actually gotten around to listening to anything. Will probably check out the album now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:44:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Speechless</title><link>http://morepop.rowthree.com/2009/06/speechless/#comment-11450854</link><description>To expand the dollar store argument - if you steal from the dollar store, you've stolen product that they then can't sell. Tangible loss. If you steal music by downloading, there's no tangible loss. There's potential loss of a purchase that you may or may not have made, as well as potential gain of purchases that you may make in the future (I've spent way more money on concerts and CDs of bands I found out about by downloading than I ever did before I started downloading).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:08:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joffi's Stuff - Sad Zooey is sad. She needs me *sagenod* (via...</title><link>http://joffi.tumblr.com/post/124420175#comment-11022317</link><description>Awwww. Poor sad Zooey.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">faithx5</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:31:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>