<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for faithx5</title><link>https://disqus.com/by/faithx5/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://disqus.com/faithx5/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2017 16:31:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: My Top Tens: 1990s</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/watching/films-ive-seen/my-top-tens-1990s/#comment-3665597983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Now those are both films I’ve seen and don’t like very much. *shrug*&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2017 16:31:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Top Tens: 2010s</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/watching/films-ive-seen/my-top-tens-2010s/#comment-3665596865</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s an omission in my viewing! My time got way more limited in 2013, and I’ve prioritized classics, so all the lists from 2013 on suffer from far fewer viewings per year.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2017 16:29:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 47: The Ghost and Mrs. Muir</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/12/challenge-week-47-the-ghost-and-mrs-muir/#comment-3070084493</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree! I think that was one of my major reservations about it.  It's actually strange how the film treats all this as normal, even desirable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 16:36:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 43: True Stories</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/11/challenge-week-43-true-stories/#comment-3013687452</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I definitely think I'll like it more on a rewatch, when I know what to expect. Usually I like going in blind, but sometimes knowing more helps. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 16:17:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 43: The Collector</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/11/challenge-week-43-the-collector/#comment-3012571998</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I remember you mentioning about the Code approval, but obviously you didn't tell me exactly what the issue was. I assumed the suggestions of nudity in the bathroom scene, but you're right, the ending isn't compliant either. But the ending is perfect.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 00:50:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 42: Millennium Actress</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/11/challenge-week-42-millennium-actress/#comment-3007972475</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I already can't wait to watch it again. This time enthralled me, but I can definitely see digging deeper being rewarding.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The chaos in Paprika turned me off a little. I know it's supposed to be a dream world or something, but it just got to be a little much. I would like to see it again. Tokyo Godfathers is really good. And Perfect Blue I've seen, but I really don't remember a thing about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:57:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 27: Birdemic: Shock and Terror</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/07/challenge-week-27-birdemic-shock-and-terror/#comment-2776351862</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Right?! And that scene goes on forever, too! It was like they got the musician to be in the movie for free as long as he could perform a song in its entirety. Actually, that's probably exactly what happened, heh.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:15:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 18: Fail-Safe</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/05/challenge-week-18-fail-safe/#comment-2668271210</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Huh, you are correct. The plots are so identical I assumed they were based on the same thing. Looks like it was contentious back in the day, too, as George sued Burdick &amp;amp; Wheeler for plagiarism (and Kubrick also sued the producers of Fail-Safe when the films were in production, succeeding in having Dr. Strangelove released several months earlier).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fail-Safe_(novel)#Lawsuit" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fail-Safe_(novel)#Lawsuit"&gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 10:19:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TCM Film Festival 2016: My Plans</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/04/tcm-film-festival-2016-my-plans/#comment-2645641660</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can't wait to see you at some great films. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:10:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TCM Film Festival 2016: My Plans</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/04/tcm-film-festival-2016-my-plans/#comment-2645640852</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would if I thought I could stay awake!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:09:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 8: Mr. Nobody</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/02/challenge-week-8-mr-nobody/#comment-2537390566</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just looked back through your and Andrew's reviews/posts, which are excellent. I tried to read the comments, but reading other people pooh-poohing my transcendent experiences is no longer my bag. I don't think I could make it through the podcast.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:13:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 8: Mr. Nobody</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/02/challenge-week-8-mr-nobody/#comment-2537380972</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There were too many parts I really dug to mention them all. The science programs sections WERE great. I also loved the story-within-the-story of the trip to Mars and how it kind of "belonged" to multiple layers of the narrative.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I still need to see Stories We Tell. Badly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've described Cloud Atlas as an everything movie, too. "What is that movie about," people ask. "Everything. It's about everything." The Tree of Life is like this, too, actually. Love it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:12:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 6 Illustrations That Show What It’s Like in an Introvert’s Head</title><link>https://www.quietrev.com/6-illustrations-that-show-what-its-like-in-an-introverts-head/#comment-2526165341</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is really interesting. I'm very much an introvert, and I do sometimes need to articulate what I'm thinking to really get a handle on it, too, but I can't do that by talking - I do it by writing. But I guess it's still more of an inward-focused process? I rarely share that writing with anyone. I wonder if that's something different than other introverts and if there's a name for it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I guess I can sometimes talk things out with like that is my husband (also an introvert), but he's the only one, and those conversations often take weeks as we mull over our previous discussions, think of new insights or perspectives, and then bounce them off each other.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2016 01:54:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 5: Lone Star</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/02/challenge-week-5-lone-star/#comment-2497919902</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're not the first one to say that! I had one set of follow-up recommendations (from Ben, who recommended this one) that's right in line with your top three, and from a friend on Twitter who suggested Limbo, Lianna, and Brother from Another Planet. Sounds like he's got a pretty wide range to choose from!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 12:27:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top Ten: Judy Garland Films</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2013/06/top-ten-judy-garland-films/#comment-2480249511</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, thanks for the comment! For Me and My Gal is a favorite for a lot of people, I know. It's not that high on my list, but it's been a while since I saw it. Maybe I'd like it better now!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 01:07:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 1: Babette&amp;#8217;s Feast</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/01/challenge-week-1-babettes-feast/#comment-2450724019</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the Catholics may have a better understanding of feasting than Protestants - one thing Protestants were protesting was the profligacy and extravagance of the Catholic Church, and they often overcompensated in ways like pietism. Not that Catholicism doesn't have ascetic sects or individuals, but I think (not an expert on Catholicism by any means!) that it's generally considered a special calling for individuals or monks/nuns rather than a recommended way of life for everyone. The Catholic church year is full of feast days in honor of various saints.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(My Protestant denomination restores a lot of traditional liturgy and doctrine, and we think of every Sunday as being a mini-feast day - you'll find us gathered almost every week after church feasting at someone's house.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2016 20:29:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2015: The Year in Movies</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/01/2015-the-year-in-movies/#comment-2439193540</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I only made it to about 75 new-to-me films this year myself! Obviously if I complete the Challenge, I'll have at least 104 new ones next year. :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Steve McQueen was pretty unbelievable as a teenager. His parents were like "go to your room," and I was like, really? You're going to give Steve McQueen a curfew?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:34:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 2016 Movie Challenge: A Preview</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/01/the-2016-movie-challenge-a-preview/#comment-2438088770</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've had enough people rave about Babette's Feast that I'm sure it's much better than its logline indicates, but I'd be lying if that logline did anything for me on its own.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for A Man for All Seasons, my expectations may be suffering by my apathy toward Becket, which seems like a similar story and which I forgot almost instantly after watching it. I'm definitely hoping they're both better than my ignorant impressions of them!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2016 18:11:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 2016 Movie Watching Challenge</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2015/11/the-2016-movie-watching-challenge/#comment-2388288032</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool! Shall I add you to the group on Facebook, and you can add your choices there when you have them?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:07:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 2016 Movie Watching Challenge</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2015/11/the-2016-movie-watching-challenge/#comment-2387598373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice! I was hoping someone would give me Harakiri, and Nausicaa's been on my list for a while, just needed a push.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 14:46:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 2016 Movie Watching Challenge</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2015/11/the-2016-movie-watching-challenge/#comment-2385369228</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool! I know you'll have some great recommendations.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:17:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 2016 Movie Watching Challenge</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2015/11/the-2016-movie-watching-challenge/#comment-2384790008</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great, Dan! I was hoping you'd come on board. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:53:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 2016 Movie Watching Challenge</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2015/11/the-2016-movie-watching-challenge/#comment-2384400595</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome! But you can just come up with two. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2015 16:34:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Against Evaluative Criticism: A Personal Manifesto</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2014/09/against-evaluative-criticism-a-personal-manifesto/#comment-2297765056</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Note: I am not always successful at exercising it, as evaluation is pretty ingrained.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:31:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Against Evaluative Criticism: A Personal Manifesto</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2014/09/against-evaluative-criticism-a-personal-manifesto/#comment-2297764375</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Useless for whom?" - Useless for me. The hierarchy among things I like (which is most films I see) is meaningless. Right now the top film on my loosely ranked Letterboxd list of films I saw in 2015 is Stranger on the Third Floor, and the reason it's up there is because I was so enamored with the dream sequence and the bits with Peter Lorre. I don't know that I really liked the movie AS A WHOLE more than everything else I saw this year. It's the drive to give an overall rating the I'm rebelling against.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My point is I'd rather talk about the elements I liked (which, yes, is to some degree evaluative) and not try to tally all those element into a single judgement that's somehow supposed to apply to the entire film. "Well, I liked the dream sequence 5 stars, but the courtroom scene is only 2 stars, and the acting is kind of like 2.5 stars, but the cinematography is 5 stars, so I guess that's like 3.75 stars overall." Except that's not really representative. Some sites I've seen do break everything into elements like that (well, not individual scenes, but like acting, cinematography, story, etc.), but how stressful that would be!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Really, the underlying assumption is that if I'm writing about it, it's good. Otherwise, I wouldn't care about it enough to bother. So therefore, there's no need to discuss whether it's good or not, hence no need to foreground evaluation. That could never work if writing reviews, because working reviewers have to review things they don't like. That's a luxury I have, and I intend to exercise it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:30:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>