<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for felix</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-25779f88" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/felix/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 08:40:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Family Pack Pricing: The only Windows 7 price I care about</title><link>http://www.winextra.com/index.php/2009/07/31/family-pack-pricing-the-only-windows-7-price-i-care-about/#comment-13832526</link><description>Steve, don't you understand? Those DVDs are a limited resource, Microsoft can't just make as many as they want of them. Jeez.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 08:40:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chris Anderson gives interview &amp;ndash; proves he&amp;rsquo;s a dickwad</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/07/29/chris-anderson-gives-interview-proves-hes-a-dickwad/#comment-13553488</link><description>Other people's stuff isn't worth money... my stuff on the other hand, you gotta pay for that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:03:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: From iPhone 3G to 3GS</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/06/22/from-iphone-3g-to-3gs/#comment-11579847</link><description>That's a good point - "Pro" could turn the mainstream off from buying an iPhone although I would be curious to see what impact it has on the macbook line. I hadn't thought of that and I can see how it might be a concern. Still, I think 3GS is a silly naming scheme and it seems like a very odd place for Apple to drop their typically very consumer friendly naming habits on their what is currently their most important mass market consumer product line.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:59:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breakfast Links: Biting Steel, Snake Charming School &amp;#038; One Million Giraffes</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/06/17/breakfast-links-biting-steel-snake-charming-school-one-million-giraffes/#comment-11449112</link><description>Harsh! Come on. No one expects a dude w/out huge metal teeth to be able to bite through steel bars.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:24:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On the WWDC. Apple, AT&amp;#038;T and iPhones oh my!</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/06/09/on-the-wwdc-apple-att-and-iphones-oh-my/#comment-10654433</link><description>Yeah - I think Apple's with AT&amp;T because they got them to provide a massive subsidy. Dunno, I mean, it's not like T-mob's going to be much better. People hate AT&amp;T and talk about all the other options, but really the only one that'd be an improvement would be Verizon, but that'd be not GSM. Bleeach. I wish Apple would use their leverage to get some better plans and what not, but I guess someone must have their reasons. I'd think, though, if the exclusiveness were coming up, AT&amp;T would have gone to extra measures to make nice with their iPhone customers so they didn't all flood to another carrier.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apple is definitely in it to win it - just read Steve Gillmore's surprisingly good post &lt;a href="http://www.techcrunchit.com/2009/06/08/why-apple-wins-every-time/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.techcrunchit.com/2009/06/08/why-appl...&lt;/a&gt; - I don't normally love his posts but this one was a good 'un.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:56:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Web 3.0? 2010 Web? How about just&amp;#8230; the Web?</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/06/03/web-30-2010-web-how-about-just-the-web/#comment-10563480</link><description>Why, I've been right here. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 10:26:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My take on the Pre - Palm&amp;#8217;s salvation.</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/06/05/my-take-on-the-pre-palms-salvation/#comment-10538900</link><description>Brand power is why no one is going to unseat Apple for 1st place. But the fight for 2nd place is on. :) I believe further, that it will be much easier for Palm to develop a brand around the Pre than it will be for Google to do around Android - given that it's going to be in tons of diff't handsets with diff't capabilities, diff't makers, diff't cost and diff't quality. Palm's going to concentrate its brand in a select few well designed phones. I mean, just compare the G1 physically to the Pre. Even from pictures you can see which one is sexier.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:18:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My take on the Pre - Palm&amp;#8217;s salvation.</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/06/05/my-take-on-the-pre-palms-salvation/#comment-10533615</link><description>I will believe 18-20 Android phones in the next 6 months when I see it. If there's 3 on the market, I'll be surprised. It'd be great, though. I'm super curious to see how the Android Marketplace copes with multiple handsets.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, on "The Microsoft Way" I have to strenuously disagree. That way has worked exactly once in history. Look what happened to Apple when it tried to go licensing - it almost collapsed the company. Or look at what happened to Palm when it tried that. Heck, look at what happened to Microsoft when it tried Plays-for-sure - it's dropped that for the Apple Way and Zune (which while not a success, is a raging success when compared to plays-for-sure). Or look at the lack of success for WinMob. Successful companies like RIM, Apple, Danger (to a degree) and even Palm of old (as well as of new :) control everything.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I agree with your point that Google is in a unique position with Android (and Chrome, too on the web side) to not really be too worried if Android doesn't rule the world. Although, they'd certainly like it to be in order to have a greater say in the evolution of the smartphone (and browser). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nevertheless, Android's committee of enemies seems like it will be ever more burdensome the more successful the product is as each member strives to cram in that which will help it the most and block that which will help it's competitors. I think '09 and '10 will see a bunch of Android phones hit the market, but I'll be curious to see if it doesn't achieve mainstream brand awareness what will happen in '11.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:40:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My take on the Pre - Palm&amp;#8217;s salvation.</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/06/05/my-take-on-the-pre-palms-salvation/#comment-10529434</link><description>Yes, no one is going to unseat Apple in the foreseeable future. No one's even going to sit on the same bench. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you really think that Android has any chance to get in the way of the iPhone juggernaut in the foreseeable future? I suppose it's because I don't see the need for netbooks in general, but I even ever more so don't see the advantage of Android on netbooks. And if it does get on netbooks, what advantage does it have for Android as a platform? It will require completely different apps - given the difference in screen size, processor, input... so it will actually serve, I believe to confuse the Android Marketplace.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've been thinking alot about this in general - what does Android gain from being an open, embedded system in relation to its fight for smartphones? Does it gain anything for getting used on digital frames? Embedded in a toaster? It certainly isn't bad, but I'm not clear that it is all that good. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm going to stand by my thought that the medium term battle for second will come down to Android and WebOS after RIM starts it's nosedive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:45:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wolfram Alpha, kinda cool, kinda like a big almanac&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/05/18/wolfram-alpha-kinda-cool-kinda-like-a-big-almanac/#comment-9531868</link><description>It will definitely be interesting to see if they can make a paid model work. I suppose access to a wide variety of structured data is interesting, kinda like a automated FreeBase I guess. Sort of like a one stop shop for a huge variety of information. I'm definitely not convinced, though, unless they've got something up their sleeve that we haven't seen yet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 07:42:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Book ownership a story to tell our grandkids</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/24133/book-ownership-a-story-to-tell-our-grandkids/#comment-9465695</link><description>Steve, I think you're conflating DRM and electronic media... I don't think in terms of electronic DRM free music that there's any confusion over ownership. You own and do it as you please, the MPAA may not like that you lend it out, but that's not qualitatively different then the fact that they're opposed to bootlegs or sharing of tapes. It would be the same with DRM free e-books. Just that at this point, there's not a whole lot of that going around.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To me, electronic music *definitely* does sound better than buying CDs. I suspect as the catalog of available e-books grows and hopefully as the DRM trend falls away, that will also sound increasingly good. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 00:27:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Review: Star Trek</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/05/12/movie-review-star-trek/#comment-9345697</link><description>I read somewhere that the choice of Sabotage was a reference to Kirk's inability to pronounce the word in the original series. Heh... But it really was so perfect.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I am with you on Bones. He was easily my least favourite of the bunch - his acting just seemed so forced. I feel like he didn't make it his own, he just tried to act like someone acting like old Bones and that seemed pretty weak to me, a little jarring even.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good call on the Winona/Slater connection. Pump up the volume! :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 21:12:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 8 Movies I&amp;#8217;m looking forward to, Summer 2009 Edition</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/05/13/8-movies-im-looking-forward-to-summer-2009-edition/#comment-9329874</link><description>Yeah, I dunno, I'm not too interested in Up. I dunno. Same with Cloudy with a chance of Meatballs - although that does have the benefit of 3D, which might lure me back in. PE and HP, are both on my list and I'm excited for them. As for Inglourious Basterds... I dunno, I hate Tarantino so much, but I like Brad and the movie looks funnyish... I'm conflicted on that one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:37:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 8 Movies I&amp;#8217;m looking forward to, Summer 2009 Edition</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/05/13/8-movies-im-looking-forward-to-summer-2009-edition/#comment-9329786</link><description>Crap! I totally forgot about District 9. Wait were you the person that emailed that around? Yeah, I definitely want to see that, too. Man, it's going to be a good summer. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:34:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 8 Movies I&amp;#8217;m looking forward to, Summer 2009 Edition</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/05/13/8-movies-im-looking-forward-to-summer-2009-edition/#comment-9288468</link><description>re: Funny People, oh yeah! I forgot about that one, yeah I'm going to see it. The trailer makes me a little worried... I'm not sure how I feel about Apatow and Sandler together, although I kinda like that Jason Schwartzman is in it. It seems a little too, I need to win an oscar'y from the trailer. We'll see, he hasn't let me down yet. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for 1, 2 and 6... we'll see what you see.... :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:11:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s the point of smartphone OS&amp;#8217;s on Netbooks?</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/05/07/whats-the-point-of-smartphone-oss-on-netbooks/#comment-9204618</link><description>I agree, although if that interface really expects a much larger screen it may be inappropriate. I think, to some degree that's why WinMob suffers so much, it doesn't do enough to customize the desktop experience for the smaller interface. I think that for netbooks, though, that it's closer to a laptop then a smartphone and so, as you say, the more familiar experience will win out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 10:16:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I like the Kindle DX, doesn&amp;#8217;t fundamentally change the game</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/05/06/i-like-the-kindle-dx-doesnt-fundamentally-change-the-game/#comment-9101412</link><description>I sort of agree with both you characters. But I think I agree more with Michael. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Amazon should not be trying to make money on selling the Kindle - the play is not the same as Apple's iTunes Store. Amazon wants to make the e-book distribution model their profit center - as such they need to get Kindles into widespread use. While everyone may not buy as many books as the current early(ish) adopters many certainly would. I think, that the iTunes store proves that most people will buy their media if it is convenient to do so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In some ways, I think what's going on right now is that Amazon is looking at everything so far as a big beta for usage patterns - in particular as to how the 3G usage will go. Before they try and make a power play on the device they want to make sure they aren't going to take a bath on chargebacks to Sprint. Hence their newly rolled out 3G charges.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also completely agree about your (rob's) view on additive subsidies in your comment below. It makes sense and is something the periodical world is somewhat used to in terms of offering big benefits for subscriptions.I have a blog post brewing here, need to gel some more thoughts. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 13:46:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I like the Kindle DX, doesn&amp;#8217;t fundamentally change the game</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/05/06/i-like-the-kindle-dx-doesnt-fundamentally-change-the-game/#comment-9095439</link><description>I think you underestimate the usefulness of having electronic copies of texts. I know I am personally really excited about the notion of having all my computer texts on Kindle. Search alone is going to be awesome - no more dealing with crappy, crappy indices. Highlighting and being able to look through just those highlights, again, much more useful - possibly even searching only highlighted areas? I think there's huge potential here, for serious.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 12:00:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Dollhouse, Whedon&amp;#8217;s most grownup show</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/05/04/on-dollhouse-whedons-most-grownup-show/#comment-9000628</link><description>OMG. Michael. I've totally been saying Walsh this whole time. I feel like a faux fanboy now! Thanks for the correction! :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 21:43:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The beginings of the Netbook backlash?</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/04/27/netbook-backlash/#comment-8809023</link><description>Yeah, I agree - I think it's got a niche but it's smaller than this initial burst of love for it seems to indicate. Much smaller. As the novelty wears off and the economy improves, I suspect we'll see this market trailing off.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think I remember someone starting to look into the telco's subsidizing netbooks with 3G here, too. We'll see...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:50:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The beginings of the Netbook backlash?</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/04/27/netbook-backlash/#comment-8777209</link><description>Huh! See, I guess it's diff't strokes for diff't folks. Still, I stand by the notion that small screen netbooks will prove to be a non-mainstream product. For me, for example, it's kinda worse web browsing on that screen than it is on my iPhone - there's no touch scrolling or anything, just fidgety mouse substitutes. Still, since I'm wrong about all this stuff all the time, I'm sure netbooks will continue to fly off the shelves. Heh!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:35:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://comments.deasil.com/2009/04/27/afternoon-awesome-a-pizza-wit-nuuuttin/</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/04/27/afternoon-awesome-a-pizza-wit-nuuuttin/#comment-8770164</link><description>Wow! I totally forgot about Mickey, come over for a potty!! I had some good laughs about that... you know.... because he says party like potty! POTTY! Gosh. I was like what, 18? ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:37:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The beginings of the Netbook backlash?</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/04/27/netbook-backlash/#comment-8744952</link><description>Yeah, I been hearing about those 10" touchscreens. I just don't know. I can't think of a device that the world wants that has that. Maybe that's why I'm not Steve Jobs? Hmm...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also curious, how much time, in aggregate do you think you spend working at your hackintosh over the course of a typical work day?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:18:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On the Oracle/Sun deal</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/04/21/on-the-oraclesun-deal/#comment-8581615</link><description>Ken - yeah, Sun's got some neat nicknacks in their bag 'o tricks, dtrace too and what not. But none of that comes close to $7.4 billion dollars worth of nicknacks. :) I'm curious to see what comes of all these things - but my guess is that it doesn't end well for most. Sigh.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:20:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breakfast Links: Turbulence, Seasick Fish &amp;#038; Leisure Suit Larry</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/04/22/breakfast-links-turbulence-seasick-fish-leisure-suit-larry/#comment-8569820</link><description>Yes. You were the cause of my ill spent youth.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:23:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>