<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for filosnet</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/filosnet/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:14:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: My Mac OSX essential apps I could not live without</title><link>http://loiclemeur.disqus.com/my_mac_osx_essential_apps_i_could_not_live_without/#comment-21761420</link><description>...and, LittleSnapper looks more PRO than Skitch... I use it regularly to upload screenshots to my blog... it does everything automatically and also gives me the HTML code to embed the image just uploaded.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:14:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Mac OSX essential apps I could not live without</title><link>http://loiclemeur.disqus.com/my_mac_osx_essential_apps_i_could_not_live_without/#comment-21760985</link><description>QuickSilver is great and you can do much more than just launching apps, but if launching apps is the only purpose, I would recommend Namely. Very (very) light and does its job very well. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://amarsagoo.info/namely/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://amarsagoo.info/namely/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:06:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The French Issue</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/the_french_issue/#comment-21661243</link><description>You will never see this stop sign in France. It's purely Canadian.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">twitter-6513952</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:19:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The French Issue</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/the_french_issue/#comment-21656841</link><description>yes, that image has been chosen on purpose... :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:17:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The French Issue</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/the_french_issue/#comment-21655230</link><description>Interesting point. I thought it was more a French-Italy issue...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 05:35:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three Ways To Thank People for A Retweet</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/three_ways_to_thank_people_for_a_retweet/#comment-21253018</link><description>Definitely. With Disqus, you can even login through Twitter. Thanks for stopping by!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:03:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 of the Best Social Media Tools for Entrepreneurs</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/10_of_the_best_social_media_tools_for_entrepreneurs/#comment-21104042</link><description>Just wanted to stress that MailChimp is definitely a great tool... I discovered it a few weeks ago and now I love it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:04:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WOW: iPhone Reaches 100,000 Approved Apps</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/wow_iphone_reaches_100000_approved_apps/#comment-21103541</link><description>This is a big slap to the blackberry community. As a BB user, the main downside of those devices is memory. On an iPhone, you can play with a lot of apps all together, on a BB you must make choices... Not great.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:54:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three Ways To Thank People for A Retweet</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/three_ways_to_thank_people_for_a_retweet/#comment-21030190</link><description>Cum laude :-)&lt;br&gt;Sent from my BlackBerry®</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:39:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why FriendFeed Is Dead (But With A Pocket Full Of Money)</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/why_friendfeed_is_dead_but_with_a_pocket_full_of_money/#comment-20915791</link><description>Yes, it is new... Cool right? :-)&lt;br&gt;Sent from my BlackBerry®</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 02:58:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three Ways To Thank People for A Retweet</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/three_ways_to_thank_people_for_a_retweet/#comment-20895065</link><description>Kim,  you are a master in "Twitter etiquette". Can't but learn from you! :-)&lt;br&gt;Btw, that picture of Linus is great!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:05:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three Ways To Thank People for A Retweet</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/three_ways_to_thank_people_for_a_retweet/#comment-20864513</link><description>Sorry I missed that Luca. Glad to hear you agree. Thanks for taking the time to share this post with us. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">glennhilton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:13:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three Ways To Thank People for A Retweet</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/three_ways_to_thank_people_for_a_retweet/#comment-20862170</link><description>Well, I actually say "retweet one of his tweets you think COULD be interesting for your followers". There could be a case when you can't do anything of the three things mentioned in my post. Well, in that case the best is just doing nothing (IMHO).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:32:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three Ways To Thank People for A Retweet</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/three_ways_to_thank_people_for_a_retweet/#comment-20862063</link><description>Kim, &lt;br&gt;you are a master in "Twitter etiquette". Can't but learn from you! :-) Btw, that picture of Linus is great!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:30:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Waveboard: Google Wave Client for Mac and iPhone is Coming</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/waveboard_google_wave_client_for_mac_and_iphone_is_coming/#comment-20478523</link><description>well, it looks like nothing more than Google Wave working on a fluid instance... will tak a better look anyway</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:03:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Connect Google Voice to Skype</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/how_to_connect_google_voice_to_skype/#comment-20395045</link><description>&amp;lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;html&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;head&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;  &amp;lt;meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;/head&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;font face="Lucida Grande"&amp;gt;Approve&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:22:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hi, I&amp;#8217;m a Twitter Translator!</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/hi_i8217m_a_twitter_translator/#comment-20186073</link><description>&amp;lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;html&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;head&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;  &amp;lt;meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;/head&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;font face="Lucida Grande"&amp;gt;Approve&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:24:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hi, I&amp;#8217;m a Twitter Translator!</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/hi_i8217m_a_twitter_translator/#comment-20184364</link><description>Well, this just shows that your company forgot to check the fields of expertise of the hired translators. I have been working as a professional translator for about 9 years, but I would never dare to translate e.g. legal texts, because I am no expert when it comes to jurisdiction. When it comes to fish keeping though, or virtual worlds and communities and social networking, or market surveys, I am more than experienced. So if your company hired me for a legal text, the result would be unusable as you say - but if it hired me for the translation of the manual of a proteine skimmer, chances are high the result is pretty good. This means, for a good result you do not only need a professional translator, but also one who is familiar with the field the text comes from, [quot] not a multitude of options [quot] ;-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julienne</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:27:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hi, I&amp;#8217;m a Twitter Translator!</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/hi_i8217m_a_twitter_translator/#comment-20100360</link><description>Sorry but I disagree with you. I can't remember how many times my company hired pro translators to make translations of internet services / tech documents in various languages and most of the time the result was almost unusable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In this case, Twitter made the best possible choice: 25 fluent english speaking italian passionate Twitter users. There is also a forum where we are discussing the best terms to translate some phrases or words. Twitter made a very good move, imho. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sent from my BlackBerry®</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:26:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Growth in Europe is Impressive, And Italy is #2. Good Or Bad?</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/facebook_growth_in_europe_is_impressive_and_italy_is_2_good_or_bad/#comment-19696937</link><description>Hi Eric,&lt;br&gt;thanks for dropping by and for sharing that useful information. I mean nothing special. You say "Turkey, assuming one considers it part of Europe (we do, for these purposes), grew the most.". Most poeple in Europe tend to consider Turkey a European country already and it is also among the three countries candidates to become part of the UE. So, I'm just saying that it makes a lot of sense to consider Turkey a European country, for this kind of stats as well as for other purposes.&lt;br&gt;Best&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Luca</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:04:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Introducing Tweerank, The Definitive Engagement Score for Twitter</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/introducing_tweerank_the_definitive_engagement_score_for_twitter/#comment-19313324</link><description>Thank you so much, Luca. Your article is dead on, and articulates many things I have been thinking about Twitter.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray Beckerman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 11:20:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Introducing Tweerank, The Definitive Engagement Score for Twitter</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/introducing_tweerank_the_definitive_engagement_score_for_twitter/#comment-19307484</link><description>Hi Ray, thanks for stopping by. Your case is and excellent example of a non social-media/techie/web guy who is leveraging Twitter at its best. Congrats!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 11:15:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Introducing Tweerank, The Definitive Engagement Score for Twitter</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/introducing_tweerank_the_definitive_engagement_score_for_twitter/#comment-19254240</link><description>Noisy and not engaging = stuff like this: "RT @somehandle RT @someotherhandle RT @anotherhandle Good morning!" or "#WhyBecauseWeLikeYou @somehandle @someotherhandle @anotherhandle ..." which are types of posts that are quite common among the Tweerank top 12.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:20:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Introducing Tweerank, The Definitive Engagement Score for Twitter</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/introducing_tweerank_the_definitive_engagement_score_for_twitter/#comment-19251520</link><description>It depends on how we define "noisy". People who share a lot of info on Twitter as well as people who reply a lot and engage conversations with other users are rewarded against soliloquist and "ego" kind of people.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:57:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Introducing Tweerank, The Definitive Engagement Score for Twitter</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/introducing_tweerank_the_definitive_engagement_score_for_twitter/#comment-19250956</link><description>It makes sense. From my post:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also wanted to point out that many other “famous” people in the tech industry are not necessarily influential/engaging/active on Twitter. Look at the Twitter founders: @ev has rank 61.72 and @biz has rank 54.93. Not much, if compared with less “popular” tweeps who are using Twitter way better. Well, it just reflects ther actual activity. Just 4600+ tweets since the launch of Twitter and @biz has over 1000 less. So, despite they are undoubtely VIPs in the field of technology, internet and microblogging, they don’t use Twitter in a way their followers can enjoy it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">filosnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:56:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>