<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jdtalley</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/jdtalley/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 19:36:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Crasher No More</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/crasher_no_more/#comment-10573810</link><description>I was thinking of the same quote, Nicky. Great post and I agree 100%.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 19:36:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Name is Nick and I *AM* a Sports Fan</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/my_name_is_nick_and_i_am_a_sports_fan/#comment-9211433</link><description>Glad to have you here posting Nick. My friend, huh? ha!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:32:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Somalia: Libertarian Paradise?</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/somalia_libertarian_paradise/#comment-9075851</link><description>I didn't mean that all Rothbardians are mouth-foaming, but some might seem that way to your average person.  Especially, the particular variant encountered in college, full of youthful exuberance and uncompromising ideals.  A potent combination that oftentimes leads to the alienation of the audience.  It has also been my experience that people carry that experience with them coloring their perception of all Libertarians.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seesh, is someone feeling a little defensive today?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nillo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:54:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Somalia: Libertarian Paradise?</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/somalia_libertarian_paradise/#comment-9075589</link><description>So if you don't support government you're mouth-foaming? Show me a government that stays limited and you might have a stronger argument. Until then I'm hoping for a society that doesn't feel the need to control one another.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:41:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Libertarianism, Electoral Politics, and the Gene Healy Standard.</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/libertarianism_electoral_politics_and_the_gene_healy_standard/#comment-7172842</link><description>The best case I know of for a "real libertarian" running for Congress as a Democrat is Frank Gonzalez in Florida CD 21.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In 2004, he picked up 27.2% running as a Libertarian in a two-way race.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In 2006, he picked up 41% of the votes in the district running as a Democrat.  I've heard this set a Democratic record for the district.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Gordon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:22:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Libertarianism, Electoral Politics, and the Gene Healy Standard.</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/libertarianism_electoral_politics_and_the_gene_healy_standard/#comment-7164952</link><description>You were totally right! Thanks, the picture makes the post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 06:45:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Libertarianism, Electoral Politics, and the Gene Healy Standard.</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/libertarianism_electoral_politics_and_the_gene_healy_standard/#comment-7162945</link><description>I win!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:09:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Libertarianism, Electoral Politics, and the Gene Healy Standard.</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/libertarianism_electoral_politics_and_the_gene_healy_standard/#comment-7162850</link><description>As for the part about poor people, I always suggest as a solution that we should "stop making so many poor people.  give each person their tax money back, and then there will be a lot more people in a position to help the remaining few people who are genuinely poor."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to the latter part of your comment, I absolutely agree.  I think many in the movement are extreme individualists who dismiss the value of communities.  I actually have a lot of sympathy with socialist / communitarian goals, but differ with them in that I believe communities should be voluntary and spontaneous, not enforced at gunpoint.  An example of a voluntary community is the free software movement, which probably produced much of the software which powers this web site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And with that, I am dropping out of the who-can-stay-up-later contest.  Good night, sir.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Derrick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:00:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Libertarianism, Electoral Politics, and the Gene Healy Standard.</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/libertarianism_electoral_politics_and_the_gene_healy_standard/#comment-7161998</link><description>libertarians have called the political class out for minimum wage laws but nobody cares what we have to say. It's sad but the reality is that the Democrats are the party of the poor people (in the minds of most). Therefor I think that Greg is on to something with having a candidate spring up from the left. Libertarianism needs to be more people centered anyway. We suggest that in a free society we'll all take care of each other in the absence of government. Maybe but I don't see the freedom movement breaking their necks to directly help their fellow man or woman. And I think this may be the next front to advance libertarian ideas. Lets bring back the mutual aid societies.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:51:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Libertarianism, Electoral Politics, and the Gene Healy Standard.</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/libertarianism_electoral_politics_and_the_gene_healy_standard/#comment-7161005</link><description>BTW - I picked that photo of Gene for your post because I think it's the dreamiest.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:43:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Libertarianism, Electoral Politics, and the Gene Healy Standard.</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/libertarianism_electoral_politics_and_the_gene_healy_standard/#comment-7160981</link><description>Good stuff and quick too. It'll take me a while to post the case for not voting. No, I think the prospects of government doing something good are bleak so I say we scrap the entire thing and let people live in a voluntary society. If they want to live under a government, go for it but people will need to agree to it, none of this social contract nonsense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The USA was a good and noble effort but it failed. Pulling that voting lever down is more a vote for a majority to continue bulling the minority than for some asshole candidate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:41:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s the outrage from the left?</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/where8217s_the_outrage_from_the_left/#comment-7158596</link><description>Obama seems to be governing as a neo-conservative... so I'd hope that there would be more leftist outrage. John Stewart nails it:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=220241&amp;title=mess-opotamia-the-iraq-war-is" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?v...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:39:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where&amp;#8217;s the outrage from the left?</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/where8217s_the_outrage_from_the_left/#comment-7158531</link><description>I think there is a case to be made that Obama is governing like a neo-conservative. And as such Gordon's point that there should be outrage on the left is valid. John Stewart nails it:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=220241&amp;title=mess-opotamia-the-iraq-war-is" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?v...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:36:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The &amp;#8220;Female Combover Pioneer&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/the_8220female_combover_pioneer8221/#comment-7158471</link><description>That clip was fantastic. Nice find.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;None of these pundits who promote "Going Going" are people I've taken seriously. They generally don't give a shit about personal liberty but if you look at economic liberty the wrong way you'll be in for one severe hissy fit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:32:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 2012 pick drops the Zimbabwe bomb.</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/my_2012_pick_drops_the_zimbabwe_bomb/#comment-7158293</link><description>This brings up an area that we haven't covered here: electoral government as a way to bring about freedom. I think it's a widely considered solution with lots of resources put into it for little gain. I've given up on it but some libertarians I respect like Paul, Sanford, Flake, etc. Is there anyone else out there that looks good? The danger of course is that any politician can pull a Reagan and increase the government while decreasing civil liberties.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:23:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reader Requests: Libertarianism, the five-minute version</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/reader_requests_libertarianism_the_five_minute_version/#comment-7117163</link><description>I usually just tell people that I don't like being told what to do. But these days I focus on the moral argument, that government is violence and is in conflict with my moral code. So I can't endorse it by voting for it or fund it by paying taxes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This normally raises eyebrows and jumpstarts a nice conversation which ends with me yelling STATIST! at them as they run away. Ok, that isn't always the case.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:04:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: About me&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/about_me8230/#comment-7116762</link><description>On one hand I'm really glad you're here. On the other I'm sad that I'm no longer the most handsome person who blogs at FR33 Agents.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:46:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News from the Fringe</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/news_from_the_fringe/#comment-6999309</link><description>Call me kooky but I also believe that "government licenses, taxes and currency are invalid," in a sense. Like currency, government is only possible if people have confidence in it so I would rather if people just stopped believing in it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No doubt this is the fringe but I don't put my faith in a news article based on a press release by the feds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great to have you posting here, Greg.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:16:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tucker Carlson: Dancing with the Libertarians</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/tucker_carlson_dancing_with_the_libertarians/#comment-6704472</link><description>Sorry Derrick, I should have been more clear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I appreciated your comments. The term "crap" was slung at the 9-11 "truthers."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:34:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tucker Carlson: Dancing with the Libertarians</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/tucker_carlson_dancing_with_the_libertarians/#comment-6698823</link><description>I don't get it.  Which crap?  The 9/11-truth stuff, my anti-911-truth stuff, or just negative scrapping in general?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Derrick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:28:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tucker Carlson: Dancing with the Libertarians</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/tucker_carlson_dancing_with_the_libertarians/#comment-6557204</link><description>Uggh. This crap has reached the sacred ixles of FR33 Agents. Boo!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:44:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jerry Brito - 100 days, 100 songs, 100 locations, 100 dances....</title><link>http://jerrybrito.disqus.com/jerry_brito_100_days_100_songs_100_locations_100_dances/#comment-6368866</link><description>My new hero.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:35:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TALLEY</title><link>http://jdtalley.disqus.com/talley_673/#comment-6361916</link><description>Test</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:52:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Create your own government, or don&amp;#8217;t</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/create_your_own_government_or_don8217t/#comment-6336113</link><description>I'll one up Xaq: I just proposed using abandoned oil rigs as a way to fast track Patri's vision. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://thinkfree.freedomblogging.com/2009/02/17/seasteading-on-steroids/283/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://thinkfree.freedomblogging.com/2009/02/17...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Check it. The pictures are priceless.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thinkfree</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:23:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Phelps saga continues</title><link>http://fr33agents.disqus.com/phelps_saga_continues/#comment-6175884</link><description>We should compile all the various projects people are starting to boycott Kellogg's. I think that's the real free agents hook here. Although I'd much rather see people boycott their governments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great video find, Tom.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jdtalley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:37:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>