<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jerhoyet</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-5449d189" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/jerhoyet/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:07:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: dm fail! - dm gblock call me later sweetie. wait till your...</title><link>http://dmfail.com/post/67097948#comment-4675898</link><description>oh my god.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:07:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friendfeed Is Going To Kill Google Reader, Not Twitter</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2008/05/friendfeed-is-g.html#comment-535810</link><description>I'm not sure what you mean.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:00:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Twitter charge high-spew users? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/05/26/shouldTwitterChargeHighspe.html#comment-535795</link><description>You're right, but there are other ways from Twitter to make money without taxing their users. For instance, Twitter receives a large amount of Traffic every day, one small, well-placed ad could provide a very valuable source of income. (&lt;a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/twitter.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_detai...&lt;/a&gt;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 11:58:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: tumblwds</title><link>http://afhill.tumblr.com/post/36142212#comment-532628</link><description>Lol! Nice, I need one of those.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 20:45:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Twitter charge high-spew users? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/05/26/shouldTwitterChargeHighspe.html#comment-532281</link><description>"Right now Twitter doesn't need more money."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Exactly! I'm not sure why people keep saying Twitter should start charging for service (in one way or another), it's not going to fix their problems.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 19:12:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friendfeed Is Going To Kill Google Reader, Not Twitter</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2008/05/friendfeed-is-g.html#comment-531312</link><description>FriendFeed isn't going to kill anything, it depends on all these services for it's content. Without the services providing the content, there would be no FriendFeed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 15:02:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Comments WordPress Plugin</title><link>http://blog.slaven.net.au/wordpress-plugins/friendfeed-comments-wordpress-plugin/#comment-530603</link><description>Thanks! This plugin will come in handy!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 11:37:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Data flow and creating electricity</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/25/data-flow-and-creating-electricity/#comment-528848</link><description>I had no idea you could do that either, great tip!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 21:03:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed kill Twitter? Not going to happen</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/24/friendfeed-kill-twitter-not-going-to-happen/#comment-524758</link><description>Do you think if FriendFeed had a simpler interface and added a "Twitter-like" feature, it could take a chunk of Twitter's audience?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 15:26:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>