<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jerhoyet</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/jerhoyet/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:07:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: dm fail! - dm gblock call me later sweetie. wait till your...</title><link>http://dmfail.disqus.com/dm_fail_dm_gblock_call_me_later_sweetie_wait_till_your/#comment-4675898</link><description>oh my god.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:07:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Twitter charge high-spew users? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/should_twitter_charge_high_spew_users_scripting_news/#comment-535858</link><description>Advertising is a form of charging for service - it's just hidden from the consumer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianbetteridge</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:08:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friendfeed Is Going To Kill Google Reader, Not Twitter</title><link>http://loiclemeur.disqus.com/friendfeed_is_going_to_kill_google_reader_not_twitter/#comment-535810</link><description>I'm not sure what you mean.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:00:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Twitter charge high-spew users? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/should_twitter_charge_high_spew_users_scripting_news/#comment-535795</link><description>You're right, but there are other ways from Twitter to make money without taxing their users. For instance, Twitter receives a large amount of Traffic every day, one small, well-placed ad could provide a very valuable source of income. (&lt;a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/twitter.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_detai...&lt;/a&gt;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 11:58:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friendfeed Is Going To Kill Google Reader, Not Twitter</title><link>http://loiclemeur.disqus.com/friendfeed_is_going_to_kill_google_reader_not_twitter/#comment-535542</link><description>Sure, but it's certainly marginalizing them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan_Lanier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 11:15:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Twitter charge high-spew users? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/should_twitter_charge_high_spew_users_scripting_news/#comment-534426</link><description>Perhaps because a service with no income stream won't remain in business forever.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianbetteridge</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 07:21:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: tumblwds</title><link>http://afhill.disqus.com/tumblwds_35/#comment-532628</link><description>Lol! Nice, I need one of those.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 20:45:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Twitter charge high-spew users? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/should_twitter_charge_high_spew_users_scripting_news/#comment-532281</link><description>"Right now Twitter doesn't need more money."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Exactly! I'm not sure why people keep saying Twitter should start charging for service (in one way or another), it's not going to fix their problems.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 19:12:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friendfeed Is Going To Kill Google Reader, Not Twitter</title><link>http://loiclemeur.disqus.com/friendfeed_is_going_to_kill_google_reader_not_twitter/#comment-531312</link><description>FriendFeed isn't going to kill anything, it depends on all these services for it's content. Without the services providing the content, there would be no FriendFeed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 15:02:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Comments WordPress Plugin</title><link>http://slaven.disqus.com/friendfeed_comments_wordpress_plugin/#comment-530603</link><description>Thanks! This plugin will come in handy!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 11:37:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Few Reasons &amp;#8220;Twitter Pro&amp;#8221; is a Bad Idea</title><link>http://jerhoyet.disqus.com/a_few_reasons_8220twitter_pro8221_is_a_bad_idea/#comment-528870</link><description>Testing out the new Disqus plugin.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 21:13:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Data flow and creating electricity</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/data_flow_and_creating_electricity_08/#comment-528848</link><description>I had no idea you could do that either, great tip!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 21:03:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed kill Twitter? Not going to happen</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/friendfeed_kill_twitter_not_going_to_happen/#comment-525212</link><description>I think if FriendFeed added a chat-style feature, it might be able to&lt;br&gt;take a certain subsection of Twitter's user base away -- but I still&lt;br&gt;think there are benefits to Twitter as a standalone app, and the&lt;br&gt;primary one is that it only does one thing.  FriendFeed is about&lt;br&gt;comments on links and other content, but Twitter is just about short&lt;br&gt;messages and IM-style chat.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:55:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed kill Twitter? Not going to happen</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/friendfeed_kill_twitter_not_going_to_happen/#comment-524758</link><description>Do you think if FriendFeed had a simpler interface and added a "Twitter-like" feature, it could take a chunk of Twitter's audience?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerhoyet</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 15:26:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>