<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jobol</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-05a80862" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/jobol/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:01:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Friends and Neighbors</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/08/friends-and-nei.html#comment-2102867</link><description>Neighbors, kind of generated, automatic "friends", seems like an interesting idea with lots of possibilities for sites with a community of people. &lt;a href="http://impl.emented.com/2008/09/02/google-in-the-limelight-with-chrome-and-android/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Highlighted here&lt;/a&gt;. [TrackBack]</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:01:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Twitter Implements Threaded Comments, Sort Of</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/08/twitter-implements-threaded-comments.html#comment-1654319</link><description>Seems like a useful feature (understatemently).&lt;br&gt;Highlighted in this &lt;a href="http://impl.emented.com/2008/08/18/restful-programming-explained-drm-leads-to-piracy/" rel="nofollow"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:24:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dare left something out (and it's important) (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/08/17/dareLeftSomethingOutAndIts.html#comment-1604165</link><description>An argument often put forward against using XML for serializing data is the overhead caused by the verbosity of the language. As a document description language however it is well suited, imho. Anyway, &lt;a href="http://impl.emented.com/2008/08/18/restful-programming-explained-drm-leads-to-piracy/" rel="nofollow"&gt;XML-RPC featured in  this week's highlights&lt;/a&gt; :-).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:09:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could Vista fail? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/08/08/couldVistaFail.html#comment-1166912</link><description>My first disqus comment. As I mentioned on FriendFeed, I agree that there really is no need for new OSes. Linux is a good example, it has just a version number that keeps incrementing. It'll probably always be called Linux. An exception might be if MS makes a complete rewrite, perhaps a windows-less OS, is it &lt;a href="http://impl.emented.com/2008/08/11/vista-security-is-broken-midori-coming-to-the-rescue/" rel="nofollow"&gt;the promise of Midori&lt;/a&gt;?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jobol</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:16:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>