<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for joshchandler</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/joshchandler/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:57:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Next Great Experiment</title><link>http://thelostjacket.disqus.com/the_next_great_experiment/#comment-21821160</link><description>Just fill out the content form on the TNGG site Josh :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stuartfoster</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:57:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Next Great Experiment</title><link>http://thelostjacket.disqus.com/the_next_great_experiment/#comment-21805079</link><description>I would love to help out, if that sounds good to you guys?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:41:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Twitter &amp;#8220;Lists&amp;#8221; Change Everything</title><link>http://davetroy.disqus.com/why_twitter_8220lists8221_change_everything/#comment-21537489</link><description>@thedrake - Vanity is a perfect word to use for Twitter lists. We can use services such as Twitter in a very egoistical way at times.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I.E those who are concerned about getting more followers aren't really valuing those who already do so. The addition of lists increases these select users ego, and gives them the impression that they are gaining more popularity, when realistically the user could place them under "annoyingpeopleonTwitter" :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:31:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As teens, do we have universal control of our digital media yet?</title><link>http://tomorrowsweb.disqus.com/as_teens_do_we_have_universal_control_of_our_digital_media_yet/#comment-20720560</link><description>Susie,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Firstly thanks so much for the positive feedback on my writing. I learn a little every day, and it really boosts my confidence seeing positive comments such as yours :).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Secondly, on the matter of "drawing attention" from your teens, I personally don't see the issue as becoming "part of their crowd". They have established friends and connections via these social networks, and if you provided input into that "circle of friends" it may be seen as "trying to cramp their style" (unintentional, I know :) ).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it's important to take time to understand how and why they use these sites, it's not so much that you can't have authority or influence over their habits, but moreso that you take time to see things from their perspective.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Teens use social networking to connect and discuss. I've often found my own actions far more influenced from discussions in social networking sites then I have from listening to my parents, it's about providing them with the freedom and also committing them to set boundaries.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think generational gaps between the "web gen" and the "non web gen" have caused unnatural divides in opinion over who is right, and who is not. For those who aren't involved actively in social networks, they are seen as the "uncool mom" or grandparent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's no easy feat, but I am not convinced becoming their friend on Facebook or following them via Twitter is going to be all that much help to giving them the "mom lecture" in a more acceptable format.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best of luck though, be sure to keep me informed on how you solve the issue (I may feature it in a post sometime soon!) :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Josh</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:44:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: About</title><link>http://joshchandlerblog.disqus.com/about_48/#comment-20066234</link><description>Kill 'em w/ kindness... love it.  Nicolema sounds like a d-bag! No where in your "About" section did I read where you were asking for writing critiques!   People can be lame !</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johnhaden</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:37:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cambridge Geek Day. Developers. Developers. Developers.</title><link>http://tomorrowsweb.disqus.com/cambridge_geek_day_developers_developers_developers/#comment-19453994</link><description>got to love the Balmer "Developers,Developers, Developers" video. Makes me laugh out loud every time. By the way, looking forward to this event (really hoping I can make it!). Best of luck with it if I don't manage :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:23:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Starting Your Social Media Case</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/starting_your_social_media_case/#comment-19453870</link><description>ha, I have seen brands really getting stuck in-between being more personable and being resourceful and valuable to followers. Some really struggle to strike a good balance, and I think Chris has certainly helped to guide their thinking through his step-by step guide!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:21:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Starting Your Social Media Case</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/starting_your_social_media_case/#comment-19453776</link><description>Jesse, I have never quite seen social media as directly solving problems. It contributes to being more aware of company mentions, and being a great conversation starter for consumer to consumer discussions on brand. I would interested to hear what you mean by "solving problems".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:19:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Starting Your Social Media Case</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/starting_your_social_media_case/#comment-19453684</link><description>Best of luck with that. I like the sound of local social media initiatives. Someone who is a guiding thought leader for small local business is an incredibly important asset for a community!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:17:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Companies are still failing to understand that influence should equal trust in new marketing</title><link>http://tomorrowsweb.disqus.com/companies_are_still_failing_to_understand_that_influence_should_equal_trust_in_new_marketing/#comment-19140911</link><description>Thanks Grant. Glad you enjoyed it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 11:15:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enough With The Social Media Guru Attacks</title><link>http://socialmediaexplorer.disqus.com/enough_with_the_social_media_guru_attacks/#comment-19068422</link><description>Dan, it's a sad state of affairs true. But, which blogger out there who is involved in using social media for their business or blog truly views the work of "Guru's" in a positive way. It's not an overdrawn conversation in my opinion, it's an active call to get those who are "in the know" on social media to get out of the game.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These people are using their "skills" to help unaware companies implement a "successful" social media campaign which never works (and these guru's still get the money for their work!). It's not a good thing in my opinion and I would hate to think that we are turning into a blogosphere which views the negative mentions of "social media guru's" as a "waste of time". Ha, give me a break :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:28:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Should You Use Your Own Language</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/when_should_you_use_your_own_language/#comment-17880925</link><description>Yes, I like that analogy Amber :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:17:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Should You Use Your Own Language</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/when_should_you_use_your_own_language/#comment-17872397</link><description>Josh is right. However, I think before you can add value or "made up words" to any language, you must first speak it fluently.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AmberWhitener</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:55:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Should You Use Your Own Language</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/when_should_you_use_your_own_language/#comment-17871919</link><description>Isn't this all really about web presence, and link-baiting online? Mentions of reputable brands bring attention and engagement from online users BUT doesn't equal authenticity and value. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean, there was a time when Chris Brogan himself has said to tap into the "Google Trends Page" for a new audience (&lt;a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/40-ways-to-deliver-killer-blog-content/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.chrisbrogan.com/40-ways-to-deliver-k...&lt;/a&gt;), isn't this in itself NOT using your own language??</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:46:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ustream Broadcasters Can Now Make Money With Google Ads</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/ustream_broadcasters_can_now_make_money_with_google_ads/#comment-17870227</link><description>Everyone has illegal stuff.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nblufire12</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:20:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ustream Broadcasters Can Now Make Money With Google Ads</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/ustream_broadcasters_can_now_make_money_with_google_ads/#comment-17854894</link><description>Shelly, uStream has had exactly the same content copyright issues. But they benefit from the better quality broadcasts and back-end technology!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:51:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Feeling the Community</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/feeling_the_community/#comment-17396099</link><description>Does the use of hashtags on Twitter cause a slightly disjointed conversation? I mean, the sharing in the thoughts and opinions of camera users via "X Hashtag" can become such a dispersed matter. There is certainly no easy way for companies to latch on to active discussions and "feel the community". You really tend to only get them from more targeted single-focussed communities on blogs. Right?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:26:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: I Don't Want To Hear About Distributed Conversations Any More</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_i_dont_want_to_hear_about_distributed_conversations_any_more_29/#comment-17310934</link><description>Louis, it's certainly a great point you make on "real-time" moving fast. It makes me realise just how much we progressed to a real-time way of thinking way before the technologies of Friendfeed and JS-Kit Echo were in place on blogs!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:42:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MyOnePage.com Review &amp;#8211; Been there, done that, the service is nothing special!</title><link>http://joshchandlerblog.disqus.com/myonepagecom_review_8211_been_there_done_that_the_service_is_nothing_special/#comment-17302130</link><description>Oo, thanks for stopping by to check out the review!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, there are multiple points you make which just don't quite make sense at times. One is that you don't "want to be another social network", and would rather be a "point of contact". I am pretty sure if this user is smart enough to know how to operate a blog then they can make a much richer engaging experience with added contact information.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, the way you put that OnePage "shows all the places online a user is on", you are reverting back to becoming much like Friendfeed but without the content (and people need that as a judgement call for that user).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the issue of Realtime data flow, if you as a startup don't enter the real-time data market soon your idea will not work, simple as. People choose to consume content at a much rapid pace then they used to, and seeing that your service only offers static data flow is a huge letdown.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And yes, congrats on the "View a Random OnePage", very well-though through, and obviously inspired by the great Stumbleupon.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I look forward to seeing how this service develops, but take my advice with a pinch of salt and listen closely to your user feedback BEFORE mine (I'm overly opinionated, and I know it  :P)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Josh</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:25:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook- Please at least PRETEND to Care</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/facebook_please_at_least_pretend_to_care/#comment-17300939</link><description>Tim, but MySpace didn't own nearly as much data as Facebook now seems too. There''s a key difference in the two platforms!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:17:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook- Please at least PRETEND to Care</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/facebook_please_at_least_pretend_to_care/#comment-17300888</link><description>Anthony, the one thing I despise of the Facebook "filtering tool" is the hassle. I don't want to click and select from a list of options every single time I click the "X". It makes me much less bothered about assisting Facebook to "improve" on already irrelevant advertising.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:16:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook- Please at least PRETEND to Care</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/facebook_please_at_least_pretend_to_care/#comment-17300810</link><description>Micheal, don't be so downbeat on contextual advertising. Online companies such as Google have "harnessed" user's data to great affect on the advertising front. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's a matter of tuning those algothirms to be just right, and certainly although Facebook have been publicly shamed for doing such a poor job, it's not to say there isn't some magic switch which could enable a much more relevant and enriched experience with advertisements on Facebook in the near future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, there are continued reports that Facebook is now making a profit, so these ads aren't always likely to be as poorly targeted as Mr.Brogan himself experienced!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:15:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Frameworks Improve Your Business Thinking</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/how_frameworks_improve_your_business_thinking/#comment-17217472</link><description>I certainly think "why" is the imperative word out of your comment I take the most value from. I mean, people's assumptions of using social media is that "it's what everyone else is doing, so I will too" but if they can't understand "why they want it" for their business, or their own personal brand. They fail!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:32:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Frameworks Improve Your Business Thinking</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/how_frameworks_improve_your_business_thinking/#comment-17217325</link><description>Simon, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your quote on how "Simple is beautiful, any business idea has to come from a framework that could eventually take many forms." It's amazing on how much of the efforts we put into our work often amounts from a simple starting point, and if we don't push it too fast we will be more more effective and succeed far more rapidly!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great wording on that section :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:29:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts on Tomorrow&amp;#8217;s Web, and my first blog post at the site!</title><link>http://joshchandlerblog.disqus.com/thoughts_on_tomorrow8217s_web_and_my_first_blog_post_at_the_site/#comment-17144729</link><description>:), my pleasure Grant. I think the website is truly a great testament to you and Rob. I can't believe the amount of video response on Youtube you generated for a first time conference, mainly from your target market! Very inspiring to watch :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshchandler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:51:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>