<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for kingsley2</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-f7faacec" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/kingsley2/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:50:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Age (and ARPPU) ain&amp;#8217;t nothing but a number: Data on how age impacts social gaming monetization</title><link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2009/09/22/age-and-arppu-aint-nothing-but-a-number-data-on-how-age-impacts-social-gaming-monetization/#comment-17131375</link><description>I'd love to see what the ARPU or ARPPU curve looks like. I suspect from anecdotal evidence and some conversations with industry insiders that a few outliers skew averages tremendously. Depending on if that's true, you'd want to go in for a customer nurturing strategy vs a casting a wide net strategy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:50:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-15486675</link><description>The end result is the same. What am I missing?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:11:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kingsley 2.0 &amp;bull; via kobold.loud.nl</title><link>http://kingsley2.com/post/165158324#comment-15031002</link><description>I think the graphic tries to make a point about sharp economic disparity and strongly protected borders. Taiwan probably has a tightly protected border, but not for that reason?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:34:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just happened</title><link>http://rhad.tumblr.com/post/163036430#comment-14854569</link><description>thats a whole bucket of wtf!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:54:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Redhead Against Discrimination | And now my blog is open to the Peanut gallery,...</title><link>http://rhad.tumblr.com/post/160662782#comment-14654665</link><description>Inquiring minds have been dying to know - did Octy survive the flashy?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:19:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: bitquabit - Zombie Operating Systems and ASP.NET MVC</title><link>http://blog.bitquabit.com/2009/06/12/zombie-operating-systems-and-aspnet-mvc/#comment-10819291</link><description>Technology may not be immune from the stubbornness of standards that no one feels inclined to change:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.snopes.com/history/american/gauge.asp" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.snopes.com/history/american/gauge.asp&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:36:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s in store for the Future of Social Media Marketing?</title><link>http://www.jmorganmarketing.com/future-social-media-marketing/#comment-2356403</link><description>Yes Jacob, companies will still have to work on building a relationship. A relationship always means taking something above the average. The average corporation now does not remember you, asks *you* to tell *them* about your relationship and never shows up for dinner. So any enterprise that does better than that is now revolutionary. This will not do in the future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In spite of knowing every single thing that you've ever said about them, the Nikes of the world will still have to work hard to create a relationship with *you*. That's what they'll need to do to differentiate themselves from everyone else who knows almost the same things about you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 01:35:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kingsley 2.0</title><link>http://kingsley2.com/post/35857502#comment-535961</link><description>here you go - it's in private sharing, and I make no guarantees: &lt;a href="http://is.gd/l5c" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://is.gd/l5c&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:23:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kingsley 2.0</title><link>http://kingsley2.com/post/34749386#comment-462413</link><description>What? nooo, don't kill Booth! Now I have to watch part 2.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:07:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kingsley 2.0</title><link>http://kingsley2.com/post/34473516#comment-451591</link><description>was this the lamest movie evar! should be called "pointless break"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:05:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kingsley 2.0</title><link>http://kingsley2.com/post/33588308#comment-411802</link><description>That's exactly what D said too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 16:48:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kingsley 2.0</title><link>http://kingsley2.com/post/33581522#comment-411796</link><description>I'll write up a blog post shortly. The short answer is that I use a custom Yahoo! Pipe that I developed to drive all updates. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://pipes.yahoo.com/update_maker/kingsleys_lifestream" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://pipes.yahoo.com/update_maker/kingsleys_l...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 16:45:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kingsley 2.0 - &amp;quot;Follow Better&amp;quot; Bookmarklet for Twitter</title><link>http://kingsley2.com/post/33165167#comment-390454</link><description>You don't *have* to wait for the stats though. That said, i just left it running on my desktop for a bit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:13:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kingsley 2.0 - Test post</title><link>http://kingsley2.com/post/32488635#comment-363581</link><description>test comment</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:20:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kingsley 2.0</title><link>http://kingsley2.com/post/32482549#comment-363486</link><description>I &amp;lt;3 the Beautiful South</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:04:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kingsley 2.0</title><link>http://kingsley2.com/post/32465570#comment-363456</link><description>it was a close call between this and the groovy shades. I was secretly rooting for the shades.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:48:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kingsley 2.0</title><link>http://kingsley2.com/post/31898970#comment-363453</link><description>that, btw is my fabulous new bay view.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:45:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google-Salesforce deal: Somehow the significance is lost on me</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/04/google-salesforce-deal-somehow.html#comment-333789</link><description>Despite your awesomeness in general, you don't get the cloud, fake Steve. Salesforce.com's services could be run by leprechauns making knots in Rapunzel's hair, and it wouldn't matter one bit, as long as it was fast, reliable and available as a service. 150M transactions/day @0.2sec average = nothing to sneeze at.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Disclosure: I work for &lt;a href="http://salesforce.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;salesforce.com&lt;/a&gt;, but this doesn't necessarily reflect the opinions of my employer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kingsley2</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:10:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>