<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for loupaglia</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-6537295d" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/loupaglia/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:48:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Tracked.com</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/trackedcom.html#comment-20786961</link><description>This has huge potential.  Will they go only B2B against the likes of Hoover's, D&amp;B, DJ and other players like Yahoo! Finance and Google Finance.  There is a real compelling possibility where they could integrate the likes of Gist capability.  I'm still not a believer in "enterprise" tracking and "personal" tracking.  I want one universal dashboard that I can segment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:48:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Business Model Jujutsu</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/business-model-jujutsu.html#comment-19656220</link><description>This is a nice approach and one of those that seems "obvious" but is not b/c that is not often how companies think.  The typical approach is "we built this API, they should thank us" when the real goal is "use" and a lift to overall engagement, whatever that may be.  Very smart of have the developer community "participate" in the revenue model, it is a win-win incentive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As David says below, it is like what Apple and FB does for apps.  I'm not sure with the business model of Twitter's API, but as revenue models gear up there, it will be interesting to see if this type of model takes hold and develops diverse set of revenue models on the communication stack.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:38:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The NY Startup Scene</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/09/the-ny-startup-scene.html#comment-15720985</link><description>Max:  Matt and Toni have built a company in Automattic that is pretty remarkable that it builds such great stuff and is basically completely virtual.  The have engineers all around the world.  They have an office in SF which is normally empty except for socials and I think the last I heard their highest employee count in any one city was four.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:55:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus V3</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/08/disqus-v3.html#comment-15062279</link><description>will it replace BackType.  still haven't really figured out how to use that service since it is standalone except for routing all of my comments across the web to a widget on my blog.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:55:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Want My MTV</title><link>http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2009/07/16/i-want-my-mtv/#comment-14434760</link><description>Thanks!  Much appreciated.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 11:42:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Want My MTV</title><link>http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2009/07/16/i-want-my-mtv/#comment-12741914</link><description>Glenn, long time.  Yes, we have entire domains for it too &lt;a href="http://www.mtvmusic.com;" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.mtvmusic.com;&lt;/a&gt;  I know you like to read the music though because it faster than listening to it. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:14:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Visiting Building 43</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/06/visiting-building-43.html#comment-10937218</link><description>yes, I know you are running the mac mini in the living room if I remember correctly.  i am regretting going with Apple TV, I'm not that much of a fan of the syncing features anyway so going with Mac Mini would have been a much better decision in retrospect.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:14:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Visiting Building 43</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/06/visiting-building-43.html#comment-10905343</link><description>I've tried several times today.  I can't get the videos from boxqueue to play back on my apple tv.  I've tried two Revision3 videos and ironically, also tried to pull up a couple of building43 videos including your interview with Scoble.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All I get is the first screen of the video when trying to play it back and nothing.  No audio, no video even though the boxee counter keeps incrementing as if it was playing it back.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've had a lot of problems with Boxee on the AppleTV, I wish I went the route of the Mac Mini, think it just needs more horsepower.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:46:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Visiting Building 43</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/06/visiting-building-43.html#comment-10847890</link><description>okay, be honest, did you know about this before you said it on the video? ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:16:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Visiting Building 43</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/06/visiting-building-43.html#comment-10815548</link><description>The technology out of BBN that EveryZing uses does this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:16:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Visiting Building 43</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/06/visiting-building-43.html#comment-10810526</link><description>Fred:  Would be a lot easier with the video bookmarking, queue to your TV functionality that you discussed. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:54:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Analogy of Status Updates</title><link>http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2009/06/05/analogy-of-status-updates/#comment-10661011</link><description>Thanks for the comment Jim.  First, what is I interesting is your use cases for Twitter and Facebook are very close to the opposite on my usage patterns.  My Facebook exchanges are much more informal with friends and family and while Twitter is sometimes informal, I also have a larger amount of content coverage regarding business and technology topics.  I rarely get into those types of conversations in Facebook.  In face, I recently stopped auto-posting all of my Tweets into Facebook because many of my friends were saying that they were confusing.  Building on that, I've often considered removing business relationships out of Facebook entirely and keeping it for my closer network of friends and family.  I haven't done it yet, however, because I think Facebook is going to have to find a way with more clear permissioning to create effective sub-groups.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To your questions, I think you are spot on.  First, I think we would be remiss if we didn't say there is a certain "noob" effect on FB.  And that I think is where a lot of my analogy comes from.  Many of the users on Facebook aren't in the tech community, so they are venturing out and trying all the new platforms like Twitter and Friendfeed.  So often, like with AOL, when you use FB constantly, the natural response you build is "why would you do x, y, z elsewhere when you can do it in Facebook".  The concept of the open web isn't something a lot of people think about, very much like people in the AOL of the 90s didn't think about what I guess we could call "the larger web".  So with that in mind, the open nature of the web and also the ongoing existence of closed-networks drives a lot of the information asymmetry as well. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The concept of the status feature was where it really jumps out to me in an obvious manner.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:32:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media - What Needs To Be In The Cloud?</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/05/social-media-what-needs-to-be-in-the-cloud.html#comment-9857489</link><description>I think cloud will take hold first as it is already but as costs stabilize, it will be a solid combination of both.  There is no reason, your social experience and related media can't sit in the cloud with pointers to either the media locations at third party storage services or if you are set up with local storage (say in-house NAS type equipment), that those same pointers can't point back to hardware at your house but connected to the web.  For example, we see already a logical movement of where people are going to be able to hook their own hardware and storage space to be available and leverage-able to cloud-based services.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again, this will simply be a balance of the costs of bandwidth (both up and down) and the cost of storage overall.  I just don't see how there won't be a healthy combination of both.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 12:12:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Boxee App Dev Challenge</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/05/the-boxee-app-dev-challenge.html#comment-9054881</link><description>touche!  you are absolutely right.  now only if it hasn't been years since I coded "hello world" in Perl. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;any Python developers out there reading this interested in partnering up to come up with something cool, give me a shout.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 10:01:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Boxee App Dev Challenge</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/05/the-boxee-app-dev-challenge.html#comment-9054258</link><description>Love Boxee, wishful thinking here but I wish there was a way for it to not get blown away with the AppleTV update.  But they definitely continue to signal where the digital home is going and with outside developers building apps for it, we'll see the same progressions as in web apps (not that the line between it and the web isn't already indistinguishable).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;btw, hadn't seen Dropos before, fantastic looking device.  A bit steep for consumer back-up needs but still finding myself wanting one, especially if I go the RAID back-up route.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 09:50:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Project to Root For</title><link>http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2009/04/08/a-project-to-root-for/#comment-8787157</link><description>Thanks Ron.  As far as the FriendFeed widget, just part of the template I am using and then using the width to get the FF widget to go across.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:46:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Can't Solve Problems With Money</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/04/you-cant-solve-problems-with-money.html#comment-8168411</link><description>classic response Fred. LOL  i'm surprised you didn't just delete the comment.  so unproductive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:40:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Live In Public</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/04/we-live-in-public.html#comment-7934262</link><description>wow.  can't wait to see the film.  i remember distinctly when Josh's "everything is online, nothing is private" efforts were going on but at the time, it seemed so outlandish that I never got engaged enough to follow-it.  now, it is clear how close Josh predictions were on how people would move their lives online, all to varying degrees and different comfort levels.  you look at Kyte, Blip and particularly Justin.tv, and you realize many are quite comfortable living their lives very much in the public domain.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:10:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It takes practice</title><link>http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2009/03/18/it-takes-practice/#comment-7320381</link><description>but video can me so much more entertaining. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:56:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Proof That The iPhone Is A Killer Living Room Remote</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/03/more-proof-that-the-iphone-is-a-killer-living-room-remote.html#comment-7306058</link><description>great feature, gesture mode is nice, I do wonder if it is natural or a bit different than typical navigation.  However, this is a big step forward from the AppleTV remote that I am using to navigate Boxee.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:29:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Rising Power Of Social Media As A Traffic Driver</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/03/the-rising-power-of-social-media-as-a-traffic-driver.html#comment-7167070</link><description>Looks like Jason C.'s putting a price to the Twitter recommended following path is onto something.  Very consistent with this referral growth.  There will be a new pricing market emerging (perhaps based on ad words) for social media link traffic, already seeing strong signs of social media affiliate linking.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:35:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mail from my 5-year-old nephew - Tom Stocky's blog</title><link>http://www.tomstocky.com/blog/mail-from-nephew#comment-7090474</link><description>Tom:  What are you doing?  You have your nephew using the postal system!?! :)  C'mon, get the kid on email and show him how to use a scanner.  :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hope all is well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:19:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Creativity and New Ideas</title><link>http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2009/02/05/creativity/#comment-6925063</link><description>Thanks Mark.  Always appreciate a re-tweet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:31:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trust in the Cloud</title><link>http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2009/02/01/trust-in-the-cloud/#comment-5759606</link><description>Thanks Eric.  Good thing you can't buy Tesla's in the cloud.  I'll take eating $250 for phone service than eating six figures on a car that will potentially never be delivered to me. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:38:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Apple might be better off without Steve</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/01/22/why-apple-might-be-better-off-without-steve/#comment-5489464</link><description>Peter, great points.  However, Apple must be doing something right and that something is they are innovating and building superior products.  Many of the 'soldering iron' complaints are coming from the technologically astute and while that demo is a large demo for Apple, it is not everyone.  Does everyone (and the typical consumer) want to increase their memory?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps there is something to Apple not building their products with everyone's input that is a critical driver for their success to putting superior products in the marketplace.  And it certainly is having a positive swing that shows in their revenues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I cannot remember a more recent example of a company that (at least anecdotally) has households with multiple devices and making repeat purchases that the way Apple prices and distributes its products.  The upgrade path that they set consumers on (while many don't like it) is really impressive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:19:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>