<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for lph</title><link>https://disqus.com/by/lph/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://disqus.com/lph/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 01:47:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Catch Up with Todoist for Windows 10</title><link>https://blog.todoist.com/?p=4213&amp;preview=true#comment-3336550517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. This is one feature that I use extensively in Trello. Indenting sort of works in Todoist.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, I look forward to better syncing. My lists are constantly messed up bouncing between Windows 10 and iPad. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 01:47:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Navigation Menu</title><link>https://laracasts.com/series/learn-flexbox-through-examples/episodes/2#comment-3201273232</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What is being used to automatically refresh the chrome browser? I see some extensions but which one is being used?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2017 23:16:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: XenWord Development in June 2016</title><link>http://www.tuxreports.com/technology/xenword/2016/06/04/xenword-development-in-june-2016-28160/#comment-2712648084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Decided to enable Disqus on the site through the Super Socializer Plugin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://wordpress.org/plugins/super-socializer/screenshots/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://wordpress.org/plugins/super-socializer/screenshots/"&gt;https://wordpress.org/plugi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 22:25:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Test Post</title><link>http://lph/2016/04/22/test-post/#comment-2638285652</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Test post on development server to see if writes to XenForo.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 23:35:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bernie Sanders Releases Eye-Popping Campaign Fundraising Numbers for March</title><link>http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=38074417#comment-2600563245</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Clinton is 30-50 pts over Sanders in polls in NY. Will her outburst yesterday to Greenpeace bother voters or has she become another Teflon President Reagan and Candidate Trump in which she can do no wrong?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 09:57:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP pins hopes of dismantling ObamaCare on the courts</title><link>http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/226197-gop-pins-hopes-of-dismantling-obamacare-on-the-courts#comment-1732784063</link><description>&lt;p&gt;1. The oversimplification of section 1251 is causing you grief. You tend to shift around in your posts to avoid the obvious that your hyperbole is only hyperbole.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2.  The ACA law is not the same as private insurance companies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. Ad hominem attacks are not proving your point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. I pointed to Section 1251. You tried to avoid the text. The definition in "e' uses the phrase grandfather because that is the idea ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(a) To oversimplify "if you have a plan then you can keep the plan" &lt;br&gt;(b) To simplify "if you have a plan that meets the minimum requirements then you can keep the plan."&lt;br&gt;(c) Actual text - read section 1251(a)(2).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here is a link to the text:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr3590/text" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr3590/text"&gt;https://www.govtrack.us/con...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cancelations of plans were those not meeting minimum requirements -- as clarified in the ACA text.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:42:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP pins hopes of dismantling ObamaCare on the courts</title><link>http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/226197-gop-pins-hopes-of-dismantling-obamacare-on-the-courts#comment-1732766299</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your post is an attempt to use logical fallacies to support what you have posted earlier. Attacking someone is not proving your point. You need to post specifics from the ACA text and stop writing that you've read it then go to interpretations of the law and claim your cherry picking is "the" interpretation." Sadly, you are clouding the ACA law with private insurance companies. Companies are determining costs, policy coverage, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:19:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP pins hopes of dismantling ObamaCare on the courts</title><link>http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/226197-gop-pins-hopes-of-dismantling-obamacare-on-the-courts#comment-1732596431</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've waited for this talking point. After reading all your posts (to this point) on this thread - it was only a matter of time before you post your nonsense.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read section 1251 of the ACA. What is that title again?  In case you cannot find the text ... it's "preservation of right to maintain existing coverage."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Politicians chose to simplify it - and the republicans ran with the oversimplification as a means to distort what happened.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Insurance companies made decisions to go against this provision and you are trying to tie it to a political party. Silly logical fallacy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 21:25:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Launches Inbox. Here Is How to Request an Invite</title><link>http://www.pocketmeta.com/google-launches-inbox-request-invite-13867/#comment-1654699161</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wish Google would provide a timeframe for when an invite will be sent. Simply saying thank you for requesting the invite is nice but a timeframe would be even better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2014 14:01:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Factors to Consider in WordPress eCommerce Plugins</title><link>http://code.tutsplus.com/articles/factors-to-consider-in-wordpress-ecommerce-plugins--cms-21113#comment-1633525519</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm in the middle of moving from WooCommerce to EDD. There were too many issues with a 502 bad gateway. Sadly WC needs a better way to export orders. It's almost a feeling of being trapped if you choose a shop plugin and want to change. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 12:39:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who was worse, Nixon or Reagan? | Tux Reports Network Community Connect</title><link>http://www.tuxreports.com/community/threads/who-was-worse-nixon-or-reagan.519516/#comment-1506000891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a comment on a WordPress article linked to a XenForo thread. Disqus is showing in XenForo and WordPress but are they linked?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2014 20:00:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NLPosts Icon</title><link>http://en.8elite.com/network-latest-posts/#comment-1197579858</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the reply. I knew it wasn't really "simple" .. thus the quote marks .. but I was hopeful this feature would be added. Your plugin is now very much an integral part of my network of sites. Thank you for building the plugin.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2014 15:24:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hands On with the Acer Chromebook C720P</title><link>http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2429204,00.asp#comment-1192733087</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How sensitive is the touch? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 15:52:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sperling joins Dem chorus of outrage over benefit cut</title><link>http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/194073-sperling-joins-dem-chorus-of-outrage-over-benefit-cut#comment-1179373731</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is a copy / paste:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unemployment Compensation Amendments of 2003 (HR 2185): This bill, which extended unemployment benefits by 26 weeks, passed overwhelmingly in the House by a vote of 409 to 19. Among Republicans, 204 or 91 percent voted in favor of the measure. The bill passed by unanimous consent in the Senate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2003 (HR 1559): This bill provided extended benefits for displaced airline and related workers in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. It passed the House by a voice vote and the Senate with unanimous consent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.L. 108-1 (S 23): This bill, which provided for a five-month extension of the Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 2002, passed the House by a vote of 416 to 4. Among 222 voting Republicans, 218 supported the measure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002 (HR 3090): This bill, which extended unemployment benefits for up to 13 weeks for those who had exhausted their 26 weeks of regular coverage, passed the House by a vote of 417 to 3. All 218 voting Republicans supported it. In the Senate, the vote was 85 to 9, with only one Republican opposing the bill.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2013 12:06:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NLPosts Icon</title><link>http://en.8elite.com/network-latest-posts/#comment-1174121860</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm curious if you could add support for something "simple" ... I'd prefer to state blog_id = 49 and post_id = 8 to get a specific post rather than all the other options. Do you think you'd support this idea in a future release? Is there a way to get a specific post otherwise?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2013 18:01:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In the Future, Everything Will Learn about You</title><link>http://www.tuxreports.com/robertheiny/2013/12/21/in-the-future-everything-will-learn-about-you/#comment-1173721364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Call centers are already using technology which should be in the classroom.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/12/almost-human-the-surreal-cyborg-future-of-telemarketing/282537/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/12/almost-human-the-surreal-cyborg-future-of-telemarketing/282537/"&gt;http://www.theatlantic.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2013 11:18:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Loading Order of Comments Evolved for WordPress</title><link>http://www.tuxreports.com/2013/12/18/loading-order-of-comments-evolved-for-wordpress/#comment-1169650314</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Adding Disqus is requiring migrating comments from one domain to the next. I'm not sure how long this will take but i notice the "Also on" links are wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 22:38:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Context Booster for Evernote</title><link>http://www.tuxreports.com/whatisnew/2013/12/18/context-booster-for-evernote/#comment-1169584510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fantastic !&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I will make the change and update the information in the post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 21:35:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Context Booster for Evernote</title><link>http://www.tuxreports.com/whatisnew/2013/12/18/context-booster-for-evernote/#comment-1169566586</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a little disappointed that the Context Booster is sending me outside of my notes when I click. My impression from the video is that the information is added to my notes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 21:14:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: XenScripts and Comments Evolved for WordPress | Tux Reports Network</title><link>http://www.tuxreports.com/2013/07/21/xenscripts-and-comments-evolved-for-wordpress/#comment-976075385</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you. Yes. I agree. The challenge would be duplication of comments within the forum as well as moderation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:07:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There's A Raid Coming On Social Security</title><link>http://www.tuxreportsnetwork.com/tuxmeme/news/theres-a-raid-coming-on-social-security#comment-795193934</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Undermining Social Security has been a politician's secret desire. They want the money to spend on their wealthy friends.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:25:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Colbert Defends Romney</title><link>http://www.insanepolitics.com/2012/09/19/colbert-defends-romney/#comment-661132753</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a test for the new XF Dev files provided by Jamie. Let's hope this fixes the duplicates :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 02:59:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Colbert Defends Romney</title><link>http://www.insanepolitics.com/2012/09/19/colbert-defends-romney/#comment-660503146</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Disqus commenting system is installed now. I'm testing to see if this note will also post in the XenForo community.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:09:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Colbert Defends Romney</title><link>http://www.insanepolitics.com/2012/09/19/colbert-defends-romney/#comment-661132750</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Test - A comment posted from the WP editor&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 02:38:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WP Google Buzz</title><link>http://icrunched.co/wp-google-buzz/#comment-654958743</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very nice addition. The popup dialog is excellent.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LPH</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:24:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>