<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for mamund</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-d5f549c1" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/mamund/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:16:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: FriendFeed&amp;#8217;s redesign has given them something to talk about</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/04/08/friendfeeds-redesign-has-given-them-something-to-talk-about/#comment-8019593</link><description>The supplied graph, while interesting, is not very informative. For example, the spike in Likes and Comments might be caused by a whole bunch of folks complaining about the UI change.  The graph is also short-lived.  It'd be interesting to see what the trend looks like after a few days.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mamund</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:16:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SocialWhois &amp;raquo; directeur's Public Inbox</title><link>http://www.socialwhois.com/directeur/comments#comment-6054613</link><description>this site is great. thanks for all your work on it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mamund</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:37:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SocialWhois &amp;raquo; zuko's Public Inbox</title><link>http://www.socialwhois.com/zuko/comments#comment-5840910</link><description>thanks for posting the screen shots for adding my "Public Inbox." [http://sometimes-zuko.blogspot.com/2009/02/adding-public-inbox-to-socialwhois.html]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; i struggled with this simple thing (the Disqus UI puzzled me), but it was easy w/ your example.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mamund</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:40:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sync FriendFeed Comments With DISQUS</title><link>http://blog.disqus.net/2009/01/06/sync-friendfeed-comments-with-disqus/#comment-4948156</link><description>cool!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mamund</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:22:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rethinking authentication (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/01/05/rethinkingAuthentication.html#comment-4915294</link><description>yep - my pointer was more about an example of showing IPs, etc.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mamund</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:05:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rethinking authentication (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/01/05/rethinkingAuthentication.html#comment-4913519</link><description>gmail does something similar:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/remote-sign-out-and-info-to-help-you.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/remote-si...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mamund</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:41:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Five Ways OpenID Can Be Embraced</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/five-ways-openid-can-be-embraced.html#comment-4318749</link><description>Standard HTTP Auth (Basic/Digest) is easy to implement and easy to use when building solutions that access secured material w/o human interaction. OpenID needs a clean(er), simple story for these cases, too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mamund</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:48:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: when clouds evaporate your data</title><link>http://blog.tonybain.com/tony_bain/2008/10/when-clouds-evaporate-your-data.html#comment-2995259</link><description>like any other major tech shift that revolves around physical assets, it will be introduced by those w/ serious asset/investments and be un-attainable by small/individuals. but over time, costs will plummet and introduce a second wave of innovation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mamund</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:05:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Grape in the Path of The Steamroller of ProgREST</title><link>http://cdent.tumblr.com/post/47459110#comment-1851370</link><description>+1&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;RESTful-JSON need not be RPC, but that is the direction the discussion is going.  too bad.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mamund</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:23:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>