<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for mlewis106</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/mlewis106/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:37:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Thank You for Calling pt 1</title><link>http://thelewisshow.disqus.com/thank_you_for_calling_pt_1/#comment-17945708</link><description>you may be writing a guest post so don't go too far fellow customer service rep.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:37:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thank You for Calling pt 1</title><link>http://thelewisshow.disqus.com/thank_you_for_calling_pt_1/#comment-17945668</link><description>Vendetta!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:36:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thank You for Calling pt 1</title><link>http://thelewisshow.disqus.com/thank_you_for_calling_pt_1/#comment-17945619</link><description>Sounds like you have a case of an old dog that won't learn new tricks. It's hard to get rid of that smugness. I would mostly suggest having him listen to his calls and try to emphasize with the person on the other end. Maybe with some careful shadowing with a more sympathetic associate. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just sounds like he needs to get refreshed and see things through new eyes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:36:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thank You for Calling pt 1</title><link>http://thelewisshow.disqus.com/thank_you_for_calling_pt_1/#comment-17898972</link><description>In my field, a good service experience retains business and leads to further business. That's a win win. Companies need to focus on putting the best people on their own front lines.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:44:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thank You for Calling pt 1</title><link>http://thelewisshow.disqus.com/thank_you_for_calling_pt_1/#comment-17898944</link><description>Good point. It helps to know what we want by placing that call and to know policies in advance too. It's hard but not impossible.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:43:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh Political Soapbox, I Return</title><link>http://thelewisshow.disqus.com/oh_political_soapbox_i_return/#comment-16217196</link><description>One last snippet below and a point. It's all political. That's my whole point. People are quick to call people concerned about the speech bumpkins, but when an opposing President did the same thing, they were also quick to order investigations against him for daring to grandstand to children. Here's the snippys:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    House Democrats criticized President Bush yesterday for using Education Department funds to produce and broadcast a speech that he made Tuesday at a Northwest Washington junior high school.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    The Democratic critics accused Bush of turning government money for education to his own political use, namely, an ongoing effort to inoculate himself against their charges of inattention to domestic issues. The speech at Alice Deal Junior High School, broadcast live on radio and television, urged students to study hard, avoid drugs and turn in troublemakers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    "The Department of Education should not be producing paid political advertising for the president, it should be helping us to produce smarter students," House Majority Leader Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.) said. "And the president should be doing more about education than saying, 'Lights, camera, action.' "&lt;br&gt;    Two House committees demanded that the department explain the use of its funds for the speech, an explanation that Deputy Secretary David T. Kearns provided late in the day in a letter to Rep. William D. Ford (D-Mich.), chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee. Education Secretary Lamar Alexander was out of town.  [...]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Rep. Patricia Schroeder (D-Colo.), chairwoman of the Select Committee on Children, Youth and Families, said it was outrageous for the White House to "start using precious dollars for campaigns" when "we are struggling for every silly dime we can get" for education programs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    Rep. Martin Frost (D-Tex.) said that if Bush feels obliged to use government funds to hire outside consultants "to make him look good," then he should fire some of the public relations experts on the White House payroll. "Then the president might be more sympathetic to unemployment benefits," Frost said, referring to Bush's threat to veto legislation to extend benefits.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:00:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh Political Soapbox, I Return</title><link>http://thelewisshow.disqus.com/oh_political_soapbox_i_return/#comment-16114210</link><description>No flack?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The Department of Education should not be producing paid political advertising for the president, it should be helping us to produce smarter students," House Majority Leader Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.) said. "And the president should be doing more about education than saying, 'Lights, camera, action.' "</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:46:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HOW TO: Get the Most Out of Posterous</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/how_to_get_the_most_out_of_posterous/#comment-16075176</link><description>Great post. I was working on an article for Posterous but you say it all. Kudos!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 17:53:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ebygum's magical mystery tour</title><link>http://ebygum.disqus.com/ebygums_magical_mystery_tour_836/#comment-15608182</link><description>My Dad used to work on the crew that steered aircraft carriers. Hopefully he was a much better boatsman than a driver!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:06:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dinner Time, Dudes</title><link>http://thelewisshow.disqus.com/dinner_time_dudes/#comment-13882499</link><description>Nick, I think that's brinning, or something similar to it. It really does help. I did not try the beer batter yet, I tend to take the lazy approach and buy the already made mix!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:30:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama Joker poster neither biting nor satire</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/obama_joker_poster_neither_biting_nor_satire/#comment-13855867</link><description>I can't stop myself.....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why so serious?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:40:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: houses in motion</title><link>http://housesinmotion.disqus.com/houses_in_motion_60/#comment-13841067</link><description>That's the biggest difference between Reno and Vegas. You can still break the bank gambling, but it won't cost as much to eat in Reno.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:04:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No one to blame...</title><link>http://wolfman-k.disqus.com/no_one_to_blame/#comment-13836734</link><description>Thanks Mike, gothic is a good term...  I'm struggling with descriptions for this one...  :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WolfmanK</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:09:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No one to blame...</title><link>http://wolfman-k.disqus.com/no_one_to_blame/#comment-13835378</link><description>I like the lighting, it gives a gothic feel when I first looked at it.  I think it's artsy enough, especially with the colors.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:30:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Letter from a Texter Who&amp;#8217;s Glad Virginia Passed the &amp;#8220;No Texting While Driving&amp;#8221; Law</title><link>http://dcfemella.disqus.com/a_letter_from_a_texter_who8217s_glad_virginia_passed_the_8220no_texting_while_driving8221_law/#comment-12038395</link><description>Steve Buscemi would NEVER win a "tweet while driving" case.  Hahaha..you need a hot actor who would sway the courts with his good looks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dcfemella</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:56:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Letter from a Texter Who&amp;#8217;s Glad Virginia Passed the &amp;#8220;No Texting While Driving&amp;#8221; Law</title><link>http://dcfemella.disqus.com/a_letter_from_a_texter_who8217s_glad_virginia_passed_the_8220no_texting_while_driving8221_law/#comment-12038220</link><description>You got me there. It would be an expensive battle at the Supreme Court, but it would make for a great Law and Order. As long as my character is played by Steve Buscemi.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:51:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Letter from a Texter Who&amp;#8217;s Glad Virginia Passed the &amp;#8220;No Texting While Driving&amp;#8221; Law</title><link>http://dcfemella.disqus.com/a_letter_from_a_texter_who8217s_glad_virginia_passed_the_8220no_texting_while_driving8221_law/#comment-12037937</link><description>But would you really be willing to go all the way to the VA Supreme Court for a bad habit?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dcfemella</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:43:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Letter from a Texter Who&amp;#8217;s Glad Virginia Passed the &amp;#8220;No Texting While Driving&amp;#8221; Law</title><link>http://dcfemella.disqus.com/a_letter_from_a_texter_who8217s_glad_virginia_passed_the_8220no_texting_while_driving8221_law/#comment-12037706</link><description>I would be ready for the cop to right me up anyway. I would be willing to hire an attorney and fight it with the judge. Maybe get my case heard before the Virginia Supreme Court and let them decide that tweetin' ain't textin'</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:36:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Letter from a Texter Who&amp;#8217;s Glad Virginia Passed the &amp;#8220;No Texting While Driving&amp;#8221; Law</title><link>http://dcfemella.disqus.com/a_letter_from_a_texter_who8217s_glad_virginia_passed_the_8220no_texting_while_driving8221_law/#comment-12036137</link><description>Tweeting while driving wouldn't help you get around the law.  Haha Can you imagine if a cop stopped you?  "I'm not texting.  I'm tweeting."  You wouldn't have no chance of getting just a warning because he/she would think you are just being a smarta*s.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dcfemella</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:22:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Letter from a Texter Who&amp;#8217;s Glad Virginia Passed the &amp;#8220;No Texting While Driving&amp;#8221; Law</title><link>http://dcfemella.disqus.com/a_letter_from_a_texter_who8217s_glad_virginia_passed_the_8220no_texting_while_driving8221_law/#comment-12035860</link><description>Brilliant :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Being a driver on Virginia's roads, I'm also curious why the law went after texters and not the oblivious morons that are talking on their cell phones while driving and yelling at their children in the backseat.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus I don't think the law says anything about tweeting. Texting and tweeting are two different things technically if you have a smart phone.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:14:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gmail Kills Right Side Labels, Adds Drag and Drop</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/gmail_kills_right_side_labels_adds_drag_and_drop/#comment-12027129</link><description>If the removal of right-side labels bothers you, post on Google Labs in response to the thread concerning their removal: &lt;a href="http://groups.google.com/group/gmail-labs-help-right-side-labels/t/6dcf0350cc4bf87" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://groups.google.com/group/gmail-labs-help-...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Haruspex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:00:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gmail Kills Right Side Labels, Adds Drag and Drop</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/gmail_kills_right_side_labels_adds_drag_and_drop/#comment-11997300</link><description>or you can go to the gmail labs group and help vent and bring them back like other loyal gmail users are doing!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">asdf</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:31:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gmail Kills Right Side Labels, Adds Drag and Drop</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/gmail_kills_right_side_labels_adds_drag_and_drop/#comment-11989173</link><description>RIP Right side labels. How I will miss thee, but I know you'll be back again someday so I'll keep looking to the right for your glorious return!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike L</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:57:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cake Failure</title><link>http://thelewisshow.disqus.com/cake_failure/#comment-10723313</link><description>Ack. I forgot to give you credit for showing me this link today. Thank you for reminding me indirectly!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:57:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pending Nuptials?</title><link>http://thelewisshow.disqus.com/pending_nuptials/#comment-10111085</link><description>I just felt it added to the air of mystery. Otherwise I'm super predictable. I will marry you and live with you forever...and ever...and ever. Love you too :P</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mlewis106</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 20:16:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>