<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for mona</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/mona/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:14:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: My Computer History&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://ericajoy.disqus.com/my_computer_history8230/#comment-17879240</link><description>My first computer was a freakin' 286 that I wasn't allowed to touch...so technically, it was our family computer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And NOW I am officially spamming your blog. #readingdirectionsFAIL</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:14:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DirecTV: Eff You, Pay Me.</title><link>http://ericajoy.disqus.com/directv_eff_you_pay_me/#comment-17876670</link><description>Crap, I think I commented on the wrong post. But I am TOTALLY the first one who commented!! ...AND I subscribed to the RSS.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:11:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox Sidebar + Google IG = Useful on any platform</title><link>http://ericajoy.disqus.com/firefox_sidebar_google_ig_useful_on_any_platform/#comment-17875923</link><description>COMMENT!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:09:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jessica&amp;#8217;s Quick and Easy Healthy Chili</title><link>http://primecuts.disqus.com/jessica8217s_quick_and_easy_healthy_chili/#comment-17337641</link><description>Kevin LOL!! Way to skool Jessica then end it with a polite: "But, like I said, it still looks tasty." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And seriously, I am anti-vegan-vegetarian-organic-episcopalian(?)-FULL-BLOWN-carnivore but you don't even KNOW how good her chili is. #CantMakeThisCrapUp</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:13:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jessica&amp;#8217;s Quick and Easy Healthy Chili</title><link>http://primecuts.disqus.com/jessica8217s_quick_and_easy_healthy_chili/#comment-17337296</link><description>You tricked me. I ate soy crumbles. And I liked it. Still not sure how I feel 'bout that, but damn straight your EFin chili is BOMB.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:02:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/07/lazyfeed-poised-to-debut-real-time.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_129/#comment-12942016</link><description>On a completely unrelated note, LG can you tell Daniel that Disqus is majorly broken? Facebook Connect has been borked since who knows when and timezones are completely screwed up. :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:55:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/07/lazyfeed-poised-to-debut-real-time.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_129/#comment-12941961</link><description>Oooh so this is what Lazyfeed is. I have a flow with my aggregating triage (Google Reader, Twitter Search, and Facebook) that ANOTHER similar service to log-in to doesn't really excite me... especially since there seems to be: (1) no method to share (2) no mobile interface or iPhone app (2) and the algorithm pulls up loose keyword searches. The third point is discouraging, for I do not want to sift through old data to quickly inform myself. (points 1-3 found via Steve R.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The founder seems like a nice guy (I hope birthday boy James guy got his invite!) but frankly, I'm sticking with good 'ole reliable Google search. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:50:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breadlines and Battlecries</title><link>http://cosmictap.disqus.com/breadlines_and_battlecries/#comment-10284898</link><description>Funny how we're both saying the same things in different ways and topics. I just said on FriendFeed today: "But it's 2009 - we are more connected than ever. There should be something bigger we can all do. It's too bad the ones with the loudest voices and insane reaches don't place social relevance on their digital activities. Sad."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 23:58:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hashtags 101: How-To Use Hashtags - Share YOUR #hashtagtip</title><link>http://mrtweet.disqus.com/hashtags_101_how_to_use_hashtags_share_your_hashtagtip/#comment-9943050</link><description>Oh Corvida - I probably make you cringe with all my useless hashtags haha. Thanks for this post!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 23:24:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Props to Eminem for Local Promotions</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/props_to_eminem_for_local_promotions/#comment-9549344</link><description>I truly don't understand why people are giving them props. Their marketing strategy was a fail. It's Eminem, the buzz should've been through the roof. John Mayer and Jennifer Aniston's break-up created more attention. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:26:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: studio.rizzn == new.media: /socnets: #AmazonFail: Is It Really a Conspiracy? [No, Idiot, It Isn’t]</title><link>http://rizzn.disqus.com/studiorizzn_newmedia_socnets_amazonfail_is_it_really_a_conspiracy_no_idiot_it_isnt/#comment-8109780</link><description>I hope the object lesson is learned here from corporate America - you must understand (not game) social media to do business on a national and global scale.  If you are a top 100 brand like Amazon, you need to have much smarter people as corporate spokesmen than the ones that were engaged in combating this weekend.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:18:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: studio.rizzn == new.media: /socnets: #AmazonFail: Is It Really a Conspiracy? [No, Idiot, It Isn’t]</title><link>http://rizzn.disqus.com/studiorizzn_newmedia_socnets_amazonfail_is_it_really_a_conspiracy_no_idiot_it_isnt/#comment-8109665</link><description>What a PR NIGHTMARE for Amazon. I knew there was some sort of explanation, since Amazon would be committing corporate suicide if they intentionally removed GLBT items. Frankly, I'm more amazed at how FAST this spread -- especially since it's Easter Sunday, and extremely curious to see how this may or may not impact Amazon, as well as the digital marketing space.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:04:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Overnight success takes a long time</title><link>http://paulbuchheit.disqus.com/overnight_success_takes_a_long_time/#comment-8051621</link><description>yeah&lt;br&gt;i agree with you</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blowind</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:04:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/02/fewer-followers-or-more-meaningful.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_798/#comment-6738731</link><description>True, and this is all about being social. The level of interaction is the key focus of this post. That's the line of thought I was treading along.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Corvida</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:53:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/02/fewer-followers-or-more-meaningful.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_798/#comment-6737780</link><description>Hmmm perhaps our definitions of Social Media are different. I take the term as it is: being social in media -- keyword here, being "social". I am not sure how you define social, but to me being social is engaging with all and any who want to connect with me and vice versa. I think it has to do more with finding your own groove and balance. That way, you can maintain relationships without it being a burden. Currently, I have Facebook, Twitter, FriendFeed, blogs, and e-mail that help me out. I just feel fortunate people want to connect with me that I value every single connection that comes my way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bottomline: to each their own.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:28:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Twitter is for Following Topics and Listening, Not for Following People</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_twitter_is_for_following_topics_and_listening_not_for_following_people/#comment-6656814</link><description>I looked at the Tweet exchange and I seriously wonder what Loic is thinking. First he causes a stink about followers and unfollowing people, then he picks a public fight? Seriously, doesn't Loic have better things to do? Liiiiike... implement grouping feature on Twihrl or something? I really question his motives. Is he bored? Does he want attention? I don't get it. :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:59:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Facebook is Failing Me</title><link>http://sarahintampa.disqus.com/why_facebook_is_failing_me/#comment-6571988</link><description>I'm thinking of disconnecting Twitter, too. But if I did so, then I may as well remove those "random" friends, since the only reason they connected was (most likely) to follow my tech-related status updates.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sarahintampa</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:14:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Facebook is Failing Me</title><link>http://sarahintampa.disqus.com/why_facebook_is_failing_me/#comment-6535541</link><description>Sarah - this is EXACTLY how I feel and it's to the point where I don't know what do. Even when I disconnected Twitter and only promote some tech news, it is still update overload... I can't even imagine how many times you update, since you Tweet out several articles a day for RWW. -sigh- I wonder what FB's solution will be...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:00:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fail to Win</title><link>http://duncanriley.disqus.com/fail_to_win/#comment-6231398</link><description>My favorite is Dave's: "    “on average, YOU ARE GOING TO FAIL. MULTIPLE TIMES, in NEW &amp; INTERESTING ways.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    GET USED TO IT.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    in fact, the more you are used to failing — and failing fast, with data on how you fail — the better off you will be.” via here: &lt;a href="http://500hats.typepad.com/500blogs/2008/10/fear-is-the-min.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://500hats.typepad.com/500blogs/2008/10/fea...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:53:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How we look vs Who we are (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/how_we_look_vs_who_we_are_scripting_news/#comment-6170215</link><description>Dave you are a total teddy bear and I've yet to see you roar like Godzilla, so the accordion player is a good replacement, now that you explained it. Nice piece to go with the avatar change - thank you for sharing a more personal side of you! :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:34:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don't boycott Kellogg (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/dont_boycott_kellogg_scripting_news/#comment-6062884</link><description>Best. Phelps-Kellog post. Ever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Though I agree with Kellog's decision. It's a kid friendly brand. The outrage from parents would be horrific!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 01:14:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's socnets: Introducing the Latest Twitter Service, TweetSandwich</title><link>http://rizzn.disqus.com/rizzns_socnets_introducing_the_latest_twitter_service_tweetsandwich/#comment-5886187</link><description>I've been a fan of DS a while. You can scale it down and almost read it on&lt;br&gt;my $30 mobile phone screen. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:40:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's socnets: Introducing the Latest Twitter Service, TweetSandwich</title><link>http://rizzn.disqus.com/rizzns_socnets_introducing_the_latest_twitter_service_tweetsandwich/#comment-5886065</link><description>Rizzn dude, that comic is so 8bit I had to adjust my screen LOL</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:29:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How long will Sarah Lacy last at TechCrunch? (poll)</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/how_long_will_sarah_lacy_last_at_techcrunch_poll/#comment-5856176</link><description>Though I highly value and respect your opinion Duncan, she just rubs me the wrong way. The first time I saw her was on Gnomedex's live stream screaming into the camera insulting the viewers. CLASSY. Then when I Googled her, I watched a few of her videos (Google talk's author day and the infamous Mark Zuckerberg interview) that made me cringe. THEN I saw her on Yahoo Finance where she conducted another extremely unprofessional interview with her guest- talking over him and acting like an airhead. Hopefully she'll change my mind at TC, since you hold her in such high regard.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 01:02:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_who_does_apple_think_they_are/#comment-5742110</link><description>He was harassing you for your grammar. Apple is an incorporated entity, therefore singular. The title should be, "Who does Apple Think It Is". ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">technosailor</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 02:38:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>