http://disqus.com/people/moskowitz/enFri, 04 Sep 2009 14:57:51 -0000http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/09/rss-is-alive-and-well.html#comment-15986893For something that's utter horseshit, it certainly continues to generate discussion since May.sgillmorFri, 04 Sep 2009 14:57:51 -0000http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/09/03/hireExecsWhoLoveTheProduct.html#comment-15924473Dave, your continued insults directed at TechCrunch are personal to me. If I respond with irritation at your misleading insinuations it's just my way of pointing out your continued assault on an opinion by suggesting it's a conspiracy controlled by Twitter or anyone else. I disagree with you. Go ahead and delete this; I wouldn't have written this here if I expected you to have anything other than a double standard.sgillmorThu, 03 Sep 2009 20:15:07 -0000http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/09/03/hireExecsWhoLoveTheProduct.html#comment-15920002What exactly do you mean here, have Twitter "step in here" and kill what I think? Get a grip.sgillmorThu, 03 Sep 2009 19:57:22 -0000http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/04/25/whyThereWillBeManyTwitters.html#comment-8694467yessgillmorSat, 25 Apr 2009 21:15:17 -0000http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/04/20/twitterAndOauthInteresting.html#comment-8478567any and all of the above. Talk to you tomorrow.sgillmorTue, 21 Apr 2009 01:37:17 -0000http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/04/20/twitterAndOauthInteresting.html#comment-8474594of course. however I am not understanding your opinion Dave. Is it that the benefits you cite outweigh the concern others have about creating the need for large monitization models that may inhibit innovation of the type you've previously favored?sgillmorMon, 20 Apr 2009 22:16:25 -0000http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/03/12/whyItsTimeToBreakOutOfTwit.html#comment-7159061I think we should start a museum for clueless Twitter snark. this one starts the pile.sgillmorThu, 12 Mar 2009 22:02:44 -0000http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/25/isTwitterTheNextNetscape.html#comment-3299359they are clearly competing for high value realtime customers and will be shortly for track. They don't yet need a larger company. If they acquire a viral audience, they will be formidable. I believe they are doing so.sgillmorSat, 25 Oct 2008 13:27:28 -0000http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/18/twitterDoesHaveTrack.html#comment-3152263looking forward to you doing thatsgillmorSat, 18 Oct 2008 21:47:57 -0000http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/18/twitterDoesHaveTrack.html#comment-3152105now we're on the same pagesgillmorSat, 18 Oct 2008 21:22:12 -0000http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/18/twitterDoesHaveTrack.html#comment-3152102Not trying to prove that, just running the misdirections to ground so that real answers will either be forthcoming or alternates will appear.sgillmorSat, 18 Oct 2008 21:21:25 -0000http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/18/twitterDoesHaveTrack.html#comment-3152093If you can model something that provides realtime track as Michael Markman and Karoli reply below, then I'm all ears. My bet is that getting close will only increase the number of cutoffs of access to disable said functionality. I've been gnawing on this long enough to start beliving my lying eyes.sgillmorSat, 18 Oct 2008 21:19:57 -0000