<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for mrbeck</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-ec609e46" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/mrbeck/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:07:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Do comments qualify as &amp;#8220;content&amp;#8221;?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/29/do-comments-qualify-as-content/#comment-554633</link><description>Robert Scoble answers your last question for you in his own words:  "Chris: actually the person who started the comment cluster does "own" the cluster. For instance, you are commenting on my cluster here. I can delete your comment. I could also delete the whole cluster including everyone's comments on it. I've already deleted one comment to remove spam. This is like you are commenting on my blog and I have the same rights there." (Source, FriendFeed: &lt;a href="http://friendfeed.com/e/e4fa4693-b6c8-4f72-a9d2-f919e708e767" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://friendfeed.com/e/e4fa4693-b6c8-4f72-a9d2...&lt;/a&gt; )</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:07:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Conversation ownership and the FriendFeed backlash.</title><link>http://colinwalker.me.uk/2008/05/26/conversation-ownership-and-the-friendfeed-backlash/#comment-531894</link><description>I offer a different view of what transpired yesterday evening. &lt;a href="http://friendfeed.com/e/4d716f6c-2b60-11dd-a8ee-003048343a40" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://friendfeed.com/e/4d716f6c-2b60-11dd-a8ee...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 17:17:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>