<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for nrek</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/nrek/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:57:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The chat room/forum problem (&amp;#038; an apology to @Technosailor)</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/the_chat_roomforum_problem_038_an_apology_to_technosailor/#comment-21649713</link><description>2007, I called Twitter the answer to phpBB because it was the threadless communication platform. 2008, I told people - it's an uninterrupted stream of consciousness. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FriendFeed brought phpBB back to the table with threaded conversations, and honestly - I've looked at it about .1% of anything else I use. The saturation of quality vs. crap is just a tad bit too high; and the more popular the site gets, the worse it will get. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry to say, most people will agree, but the "general population" isn't profound often enough, but they still enjoy being heard. In fact, if the general pop. was profound, it wouldn't be profound/intelligent then... would it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Twitter is a fundamental form of communication with very precise functions. Exploitation is still available to spammers, but blocking is king in that regard, I reckon.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:57:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Co-Founder: I Did Not Try to Buy Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/google_co_founder_i_did_not_try_to_buy_twitter/#comment-20808137</link><description>"but if a companies approach them, they consider."... what? Benn! Proof reading is your friend :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-- PS: Good article. It's always refreshing to have someone silence all the bullshit surrounding the mysterious things the general public generally knows jack sh*t about.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:08:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple COO: Everyone Else Still Playing Catch-Up to the First iPhone</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/apple_coo_everyone_else_still_playing_catch_up_to_the_first_iphone/#comment-20589981</link><description>Reminds me of Sony when they talked about the Walkman. For those of you who have no idea WTF that is, case &amp; point.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:10:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Retweets Revisited: Commenting on Retweets is Important</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/retweets_revisited_commenting_on_retweets_is_important/#comment-16989495</link><description>If you gotta be heard so bad that a comment structure attached to a Tweet is going to ruffle the fabric of your Twitterverse - try a tweet format that's not "RT" based, but link threaded, like so :: %COMMENT% RT @username &lt;a href="http://lbit.ly/to_status" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://lbit.ly/to_status&lt;/a&gt; ... done. Seems simple.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:24:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Farewell CNET</title><link>http://ilovecontent.disqus.com/farewell_cnet/#comment-16008854</link><description>great write up! good luck at your new adventures over at N-..... the new place!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:36:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Daily Death: When A Celebrity Dies Every 15 Minutes</title><link>http://tomorrowmuseum.disqus.com/the_daily_death_when_a_celebrity_dies_every_15_minutes/#comment-15021741</link><description>Love this post! Now check out this site &lt;a href="http://WillYouTrend.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://WillYouTrend.com&lt;/a&gt; - kinda fitting, no?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:15:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama The Antichrist</title><link>http://nrek.disqus.com/obama_the_antichrist/#comment-12490434</link><description>Allow me to ... think. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To approach your argument correctly, I need to first find out whether or not your fundamental christian beliefs in a man-delivered book of the "word of God" are remotely reasonable. I also need to take into account that beliefs and faith are two very personally held structures by any one or group of persons, and therefore: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I need to keep my opinions of your religiously rooted insights to myself, as I can't tell you what to believe. On another note, I can tell you that your own ego (humanity believing they can define God) and vanity in those beliefs (denouncing anyone that claims man-made your beliefs) creates the paradox to end all arguments regarding rapture, apocalypse, etc. If you are correct, you will also find out soon enough what exactly it means to be as religious as you are. Faith, is the key to happiness, not faith in religion. Take that with you and you'll live better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:42:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Something about Apple.</title><link>http://nrek.disqus.com/something_about_apple/#comment-10758323</link><description>That idea might violate the "User Experience" control-Nazi thing they have going on with their "happy go lucky" washed out outlook on society... Yep, actually, I'm positive it does. I didn't even touch on that in this post, actually - and totally should have. They're restricted - understandably so - but we Americans should be sick of blatant Big Brother. heh</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:51:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: wizardElite - This image makes me want to go to Venice! FILE Magazine - The Collection - Venice with other eyes</title><link>http://tumblelogofaninternetaddict.disqus.com/wizardelite_this_image_makes_me_want_to_go_to_venice_file_magazine_the_collection_venice_with_other_/#comment-10368130</link><description>I remember! High Dynamic Range. I had this same conversation with @viss a while back. I see what your saying now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wizardelite</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:57:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: wizardElite - This image makes me want to go to Venice! FILE Magazine - The Collection - Venice with other eyes</title><link>http://tumblelogofaninternetaddict.disqus.com/wizardelite_this_image_makes_me_want_to_go_to_venice_file_magazine_the_collection_venice_with_other_/#comment-10366217</link><description>In short? It could have been a great opportunity for some good ol' fashioned extended exposure. (ref: &lt;a href="http://n-re-k.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;n-re-k.com&lt;/a&gt; for shameless self promotion, perfect execution of night photography, 0% bs HDR)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:50:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: wizardElite - This image makes me want to go to Venice! FILE Magazine - The Collection - Venice with other eyes</title><link>http://tumblelogofaninternetaddict.disqus.com/wizardelite_this_image_makes_me_want_to_go_to_venice_file_magazine_the_collection_venice_with_other_/#comment-10366070</link><description>HDR ruined this photo.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:45:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Name is E</title><link>http://sociosophy.disqus.com/my_name_is_e/#comment-9061904</link><description>&lt;a href="http://www.mynameise.com/nrek" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.mynameise.com/nrek&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 12:57:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FollowFriday - May 1, 2009</title><link>http://nrek.disqus.com/followfriday_may_1_2009/#comment-8901583</link><description>Hey! Watch it, I got a reputation to uphold here...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:04:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FollowFriday - May 1, 2009</title><link>http://nrek.disqus.com/followfriday_may_1_2009/#comment-8901215</link><description>Hell yea, Paul. You kick ass... Better than Oprah even!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 13:53:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FollowFriday - May 1, 2009</title><link>http://nrek.disqus.com/followfriday_may_1_2009/#comment-8901191</link><description>That's how I do :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll send you the PR invoice to your PayPal email addy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 13:52:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechLifeWeb Stream</title><link>http://techlifewebstream.disqus.com/techlifeweb_stream_38/#comment-8798772</link><description>BBVD at their finest. This is epic, classic jump blues greatness.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:41:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clipta</title><link>http://sociosophy.disqus.com/clipta/#comment-8588322</link><description>Alan, thank you for your comment. Glad to hear you're not affiliated with YouTube, maybe your comments will stay useful and sensible. Anyhow, good luck on the venture! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Social network, just say no) ;) Cheers!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:52:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Love</title><link>http://cyanbanister.disqus.com/love/#comment-7992692</link><description>Hey! Thank you :) ~ designer guy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:35:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting Started with PHP for WordPress</title><link>http://nrek.disqus.com/getting_started_with_php_for_wordpress/#comment-7954172</link><description>Great point! Definitely don't actually use "$this" as a variable in PHP, it's actually good practice to just not use "this" as a variable anywhere - it's too ambiguous, but it's also a reserved term in quite a few languages as well</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:32:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Posty</title><link>http://sociosophy.disqus.com/posty/#comment-7792920</link><description>Tumblr fail :( &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll update the post. Love the app so far. Let me know when you address the fails ;) We'll re-review it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:55:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed vs. Facebook</title><link>http://sociosophy.disqus.com/friendfeed_vs_facebook/#comment-7790689</link><description>FriendFeed is pretty difficult to navigate and filter. There are Lists and Rooms for seperating content, but all in all, it is way too easy to get too much info, and that kind of UI flubbing will keep FriendFeed from going mainstream. Facebook's new interface is way too darn busy, but the news feed section and left panel on the home page was a great move. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The likeness Facebook's new features has to Twitter and FriendFeed alike shows that they are apying attention at least, now if they can just unclutter the mess they have on the right of the homepage/news feed... all the better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:34:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Klok</title><link>http://sociosophy.disqus.com/klok/#comment-7764604</link><description>According to Klok - this post took me 9 minutes to write &amp; proof read. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Knowing that, it's a wonder why I don't post more often. Hmmm....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:53:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Nokia N97: Why Nokia? | Enrique Gutierrez</title><link>http://nrek.disqus.com/the_nokia_n97_why_nokia_enrique_gutierrez/#comment-7750348</link><description>Yes, Haptic Feedback is part of the hardware feature set on the N97's touchscreen; feeling when you press something correctly on the screen instead of merely seeing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:36:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s Talk Music</title><link>http://nrek.disqus.com/let8217s_talk_music/#comment-7111416</link><description>RIGO!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What up, vato? Now I have some more DJ's to look up. Thanks for the comment &amp; thanks for rubbing in the fact that you're going to WMC w/o me ... AGAIN... rat bastard.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:10:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Economy - Part 1 - Bailout | Enrique Gutierrez</title><link>http://nrek.disqus.com/the_economy_part_1_bailout_enrique_gutierrez/#comment-6718176</link><description>JOEL! shit man, we need to catch up... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree, even if Clinton started it why are we all here hoping that Obama can finally clean it all up? Where the hell was W's priorities for the EIGHT years he was in office? Oh yea, oil control. Which we successfully kept from China, good job USA. But that's saved for Part 3 of this rant.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nrek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:50:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>