<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for parislemon</title><link>https://disqus.com/by/parislemon/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://disqus.com/parislemon/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:19:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s not evil: ranking content fairly *and* letting public content get indexed</title><link>http://cdixon.org/2012/01/23/whats-not-evil-ranking-content-fairly-and-letting-public-content-get-indexed/#comment-419211745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is my understanding of the situation as well. It's a technical challenge, not a content one. Which is to say it's complicated, naturally. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:19:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Tumblrs We've Ever Seen, This Year - Technology - The Atlantic Wire</title><link>http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2011/12/best-tumblrs-weve-ever-seen-year/46779/#comment-400924439</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks for the mention Adam -- you're no longer on the dick-list :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 21:30:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPad Today 77</title><link>http://twit.tv/show/ipad-today/77#comment-394081185</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hmph.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 12:26:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPad Today 77</title><link>http://twit.tv/show/ipad-today/77#comment-394081024</link><description>&lt;p&gt;good show!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 12:25:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don't Let Good Friends Hear About It On TechCrunch</title><link>http://avc.com/2011/08/dont-let-good-friends-hear-about-it-on-techcrunch/#comment-300480422</link><description>&lt;p&gt;heh. as always, we're discussing and weighing options for commenting. we'll see.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:22:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don't Let Good Friends Hear About It On TechCrunch</title><link>http://avc.com/2011/08/dont-let-good-friends-hear-about-it-on-techcrunch/#comment-299757122</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd prefer they read it first on TechCrunch, but maybe I'm biased.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:04:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://sarahintampa.tumblr.com/post/8517357990</title><link>http://sarahintampa.tumblr.com/post/8517357990#comment-278445975</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Glad you're on board!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:00:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AOL's New AV Steals Thunder from the Big Skype Deal - Technology - The Atlantic Wire</title><link>http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2011/05/aols-new-av-steals-thunder-big-skype-deal/37543/#comment-201111362</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Herself? How about HIMSELF :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 18:34:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://actionatadistance.net/post/5186480845</title><link>http://actionatadistance.net/post/5186480845#comment-196797216</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One: But the new 30-pin Thunderbolt-ready adapters are also USB 3.0 (and 2.0) compatible. So no big deal there. It will just be a "smoke em if you got em" situation for Thunderbolt (which should be much more widely deployed next year, obviously)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Two: True, but rumors have been out there that Apple is looking at big time speed increases for this as well for iPhone 5. See: &lt;a href="http://hitechanalogy.com/apple-64-gb-next-generation-iphone-5-to-get-24nm-toshiba-smartnand-flash-memory/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://hitechanalogy.com/apple-64-gb-next-generation-iphone-5-to-get-24nm-toshiba-smartnand-flash-memory/"&gt;http://hitechanalogy.com/ap...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obviously, it wouldn't get you anywhere near theoretical limit, but each year, this will get faster and faster. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 06:17:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is The Web's Focus on "Now" Losing How to Find "When"?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2011/03/is-webs-focus-on-now-losing-how-to-find.html#comment-163385523</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I miss FriendFeed...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 03:38:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Real &amp;#8220;Authenticity Killer&amp;#8221; (and an aside about how bad the Yahoo brand has gotten)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2011/03/07/the-real-authenticity-killer-and-an-aside-about-how-bad-the-yahoo-brand-has-gotten/#comment-162107756</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yep.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 21:42:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: For 40,000 Gmail Users, Google Has To Leave The Cloud To Review The Tapes</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/28/gmail-failure-2011/#comment-158149877</link><description>&lt;p&gt;actually it's not free for me (and many others) i pay for a lot of extra storage.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 02:14:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: For 40,000 Gmail Users, Google Has To Leave The Cloud To Review The Tapes</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/28/gmail-failure-2011/#comment-158149745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wait, but i'm the guy who is always talking about the downfall of good, i thought?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 02:14:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: For 40,000 Gmail Users, Google Has To Leave The Cloud To Review The Tapes</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/28/gmail-failure-2011/#comment-158140595</link><description>&lt;p&gt;no one would have noticed?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 01:48:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chomp May Have Just Solved The Nightmare That Is Android App Search</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/28/chomp-android/#comment-157838703</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i actually have had about 7 android phones over the past few years.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:34:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chomp May Have Just Solved The Nightmare That Is Android App Search</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/28/chomp-android/#comment-157837847</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn't.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:33:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chomp May Have Just Solved The Nightmare That Is Android App Search</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/28/chomp-android/#comment-157837686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the website is a big improvement just in the fact that it's a website instead of that awful on device experience. chomp provides a MUCH better on device experience -- and better search for apps.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:32:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Two Years, Most Of You Will Be Reading TechCrunch From An Apple Device</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/27/apple-versus-microsoft-share/#comment-157332152</link><description>&lt;p&gt;BUT BE SURE TO STOP AND COMMENT!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:51:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Two Years, Most Of You Will Be Reading TechCrunch From An Apple Device</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/27/apple-versus-microsoft-share/#comment-157330312</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i would bet it's less actually.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:45:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Two Years, Most Of You Will Be Reading TechCrunch From An Apple Device</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/27/apple-versus-microsoft-share/#comment-157330052</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i'll watch for a spike!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:44:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Two Years, Most Of You Will Be Reading TechCrunch From An Apple Device</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/27/apple-versus-microsoft-share/#comment-157329716</link><description>&lt;p&gt;interesting conspiracy theory.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:44:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Two Years, Most Of You Will Be Reading TechCrunch From An Apple Device</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/27/apple-versus-microsoft-share/#comment-157329395</link><description>&lt;p&gt;here's a link that should help &lt;a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/27/apple-versus-microsoft-share/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/27/apple-versus-microsoft-share/"&gt;http://techcrunch.com/2011/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:43:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Two Years, Most Of You Will Be Reading TechCrunch From An Apple Device</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/27/apple-versus-microsoft-share/#comment-157328993</link><description>&lt;p&gt;but it's not my opinion, it's simply an extrapolation of the numbers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:43:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Two Years, Most Of You Will Be Reading TechCrunch From An Apple Device</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/27/apple-versus-microsoft-share/#comment-157319873</link><description>&lt;p&gt;well of course traffic has gone up, but the numbers show that it's going up FAR faster on apple devices than microsoft devices.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:17:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Two Years, Most Of You Will Be Reading TechCrunch From An Apple Device</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/27/apple-versus-microsoft-share/#comment-157319626</link><description>&lt;p&gt;re: last point, sure but the key is the shift. just four years ago it was nearly 85% windows users!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:16:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>