<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for paulsweeney</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-f9e436fa" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/paulsweeney/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:51:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Bittersweet mint.</title><link>http://www.parkparadigm.com/2009/09/14/bittersweet-mint/#comment-17369759</link><description>Mint was also on my radar for a long time (picked them up at the Finovate conference in NY). I have to agree with you that this was a billion dollar business sold too soon. I think experienced, and perhaps more personally wealthy founders, would have pushed the boat out on this one. Just FYI, the cost of developing this proposition versus the cost of developing EGG, or Halifax Personal Finance shows how the cost of entry has dropped. On the downside, Mint never tested their Data-API to 3rd parties as a revenue stream, so maybe this was more about the potential upside of data driven services than cross selling.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:51:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Taking it to the next level</title><link>http://jamessiminoff.com/post/185194896#comment-16422217</link><description>Yeah, let me add to the chorus. The very epitome of good business sense here. No doubt this is onwards and upwards. Hope to catch up with you at one of the eComm's or Telco 2's hopefully :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:46:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple&amp;rsquo;s rejection of Google Voice on the iPhone doesn&amp;rsquo;t bode well for them</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/07/29/apples-rejection-of-google-voice-on-the-iphone-doesnt-bode-well-for-them/#comment-13501030</link><description>Perhaps short term profit will kill apple as platform. Probably client versus web as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:41:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Cartoon That Predicted Google Chrome OS</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/08/google-os-cartoon/#comment-12368292</link><description>That is just brilliant. Genius in fact.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:09:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo! closes a business it acquired for $160m last year</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/06/30/yahoo-closes-a-business-it-acquired-for-160m-last-year/#comment-11929804</link><description>Perhaps the M&amp;A Malaise is just indicative of the deterioration in the core model. Google has killed a few acquisitions as well, but the cynical among us called those "M&amp;A the New HR", in that it was more about talent acquisition. On that note, how seriously do you think they are penetrating enterprise accounts with their App offering, and do you think they stand any chance against Amazon for application environment (I don't).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:32:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enterprise 2.0 Software: Commoditization before Monetization</title><link>http://www.pretzellogic.org/2009/06/enterprise-20-software-commoditization-before-monetization/#comment-11057664</link><description>Hi Guys. Great conversation and agree with nearly everything you are saying. There might be other "inflections" to the discussion such as How exactly does open source effect the SaaS model of the likes of Salesforce.com? and "where is the pain" (Integration from legacy?), and "where are the current and future friction points in adoption" (old fashioned barriers to entry and exit). If everything looks the same, and acts the same, its pretty hard to extract value.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:29:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Networks to be Used for Asthma Alerts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/04/asthma-alerts-social-networks/#comment-8981116</link><description>It is a good idea, especially if it "nudges" everyone to keep the inhaler and medication close on risky days. I am just wondering if there are any particular 'social factors' that are / could be useful here? Lets face it, a simple SMS with high, medium, low, or actual pollen count number could be nearly 100% distribution, passive, and not annoying. Serious sufferers will have their own "strong plans" in place in terms of communications.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 09:49:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Connect Google Voice to Skype</title><link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2009/03/how-to-connect-google-voice-to-skype.html#comment-7439135</link><description>That was an excellent hacking/ integration tip there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:40:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It is phenomenal how fast the world is changing</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/03/19/it-is-phenomenal-how-fast-the-world-is-changing/#comment-7360152</link><description>Excellent comments so far. The one that struck me first was yes, (to all the internet-information-science stuff), but wouldn't it be interesting to see one that took the same approach to "% of population with access to clean water", "No. of people that die of cancer", etc. etc. i.e. the "information consumption piece is pretty meaningless other than as "infotainment". Having us all connected in a social network, may ultimately, be pretty pointless, unless it can be used to harness action, point decisions, and "get things done".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:19:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thank you Google! Thank you! Thank you!</title><link>http://jamessiminoff.com/post/86801254#comment-7251180</link><description>Great, great posting. I also think that GV will not find favor with the larger scale enterprises. It will be interesting to track the uptake of Google Apps in that regard. A caveat I might add is that Google may (just may) teach people new habits (because they are incentivised by free), with regards handling the "close the loop" numbering regime.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:02:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook goes realtime to take on Twitter</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/03/05/facebook-goes-realtime-to-take-on-twitter/#comment-6898679</link><description>Oh by the way, love the look and feel of the blog re-design...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:35:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook goes realtime to take on Twitter</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/03/05/facebook-goes-realtime-to-take-on-twitter/#comment-6898668</link><description>Agreed. One of the things I had missed is they way they "crowdsourced" internationalisation and translation. Real-time is going to be big. The way linkedin is handling my groups and conversations is like a box of drawers ten foot hight, with all my underwear hanging out :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:33:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Andy Abramson, Thank You!</title><link>http://jamessiminoff.com/post/77280712#comment-6601447</link><description>Well that's just great to hear. And hey James, better not to have "married the wrong person" right?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:58:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New study showing that for entreprenneurs past success is the best indicator of future success</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/02/13/new-study-showing-that-for-entreprenneurs-past-success-is-the-best-indicator-of-future-success/#comment-6238116</link><description>Excellent piece. I think you really should follow up on this line of research. I have heard that in Ireland, some VC's will only invest if (1) the team are all ex-MNC's, (Multi National Corporation); (2) Working in a related area (3) Have done this before. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also suspect that some countries do not support either new market types, or retail based propositions (i.e. Ireland tends not to).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:43:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Track your friends on mobile with Google Maps</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2009/02/04/track-your-friends-on-mobile-with-google-maps/#comment-5834270</link><description>Nic, imagine if you could get your customer to download/share an instance through an email link? (i.e. I send you "this link" as part of a delivery confirmation process, or a meeting confirmation process?). I now, for the duration of this interaction, KNOW where you are, and probably how likely we are in any point in time, to complete said process successfully.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:54:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Predictions for 2009</title><link>http://www.parkparadigm.com/2008/12/31/predictions-for-2009/#comment-4933092</link><description>Well, it will be worth keeping an eye on that's for sure. Might be interesting to see you do some "social picks" on these and then watch you work :) Looking forward to hearing what you are getting stuck into 6th paradigm wise.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:46:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Launches Vocito, a Desktop UI for GrandCentral</title><link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/11/google-launches-vocito-a-desktop-ui-for-grandcentral.html#comment-3893580</link><description>Good catch. I really liked the GC idea but as I was in Ireland, could never get the international numbering set up (USA Only). My one true hope for this, is that when Google releases it, it will have truly global reach. Google, being Google, probably won't release a straight forward calling service though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:37:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I joined Nokia today! - RussellBeattie.com</title><link>http://www.russellbeattie.com/blog/i-joined-nokia-today#comment-2509639</link><description>Yes, just adding the voice to the chorus. Might be interesting to hear if your blogging, or blog following, was in any way important in the review process for Nokia.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:29:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Coming up for air.</title><link>http://www.parkparadigm.com/2008/09/12/coming-up-for-air/#comment-2330616</link><description>Lovely redesign. Very clean. Some nice touches, like the date tab on the side. Like Disqus for comments....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:37:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh, btw, I have a job... - RussellBeattie.com</title><link>http://www.russellbeattie.com/blog/oh-btw-i-have-a-job#comment-2257470</link><description>Yes, must say I am happy that you can put some money in the bank for a while :) Hopefully, you will be also able to keep up the blogging, even if "boosting" your new employer ! Dan York does a terrific job of this at his new company Voxeo.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 05:11:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I was right. Facebook is spun.</title><link>http://innonate.com/2008/06/10/i-was-right-facebook-is-spun/#comment-729130</link><description>Well, its kinda funny when you look at it that way. The Open V Closed, might also have a supplemental question: "what is the purpose of facebook"? It's a non trivial question.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:23:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Lot Has Changed In A Century, But Not Everything</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/04/a-lot-has-chang.html#comment-360030</link><description>check out &lt;a href="http://www.bioteams.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.bioteams.com&lt;/a&gt; for some articles and studies on how one way communications (i.e. sms - twitter streams) are more like how ants communicate, and are effective for some good reasons. I also think that one of the challenges is finding out when asynchronous should switch modes, i.e. when an action bias takes precedence over a communications flow.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulsweeney</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:42:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>